Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Eye on Iran: Iran Hard-Liners Urge Election Ban on Top Rivals










For continuing coverage follow us on Twitter and join our Facebook group.
  
Top Stories

AP: "Hard-line Iranian lawmakers petitioned authorities Tuesday to bar two prominent presidential contenders - a moderate former president and a protege of current President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - from running in next month's election in a further sign of intense political jockeying over the final ballot list. The appeal by nearly 100 parliament members reflects worries over the potential election-swaying influence of ex-President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, a close confident of Ahmadinejad. Both could pull votes from two different directions - Rafsanjani appealing to reformists and Mashaei favored by Ahmadinejad's backers - and shift attention away from other potential front-runners with close ties to the ruling clerics. Mashaei faces an uphill battle to get his name on the June 14 ballot because of Ahmadinejad's political feuds with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Rafsanjani, however, is perhaps too venerable to be rejected by the election overseers known as the Guardian Council, which vets all candidates and is expected to announce the ballot list next week. In a pre-emptive move, the pro-establishment lawmakers - accounting for more than a third of the 290-seat parliament - appealed to the Guardian Council to knock both from the election race. One of the lawmakers, Javad Karimi Qodoosi, said they want Rafsanjani barred for supporting the opposition in the disputed 2009 vote and Mashaei disqualified for his alleged un-Islamic attitudes." http://t.uani.com/142BPm3

Reuters: "Iran faces international pressure over its nuclear program in two separate meetings on Wednesday, but no breakthrough is expected with the Islamic state focused on next month's presidential election. In Vienna, the U.N. nuclear agency will once again urge Iran to stop stonewalling its inquiry into suspected atomic bomb research by Tehran, which denies any intent to make such arms. The talks started around 10 a.m. (4 a.m. EDT) at Iran's diplomatic mission in the Austrian capital. 'Differences remain but we ... are determined to solve these issues,' Herman Nackaerts, deputy director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told reporters. Later over dinner in Istanbul, the European Union's top diplomat will meet Iran's chief nuclear negotiator - also now a presidential candidate - to discuss a broader diplomatic effort bid to resolve a row that could ignite war in the Middle East." http://t.uani.com/10OKgT4

TradeWinds: "Greek shipowner Victor Restis has been accused of engaging in illicit dealings with Iran while serving as chairman of First Business Bank (FBB). United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI), a lobbying group led by former US ambassador to the United Nations Mark Wallace, claims the tycoon was involved in the formation of a strategic alliance between FBB and Iran's Ministry of Petroleum. The allegations, which Restis has refuted, stem from a letter in which Greek businessman Dimitris Cambis, who recently landed on the US Treasury Department's blacklist, asked Restis and FBB CEO Christos Kazantzis to back an Iranian investment scheme. TradeWinds obtained copies of two documents, including one dated 25 April 2012 and signed by Cambis on the letterhead of Athene Consulting House in which he requests a meeting aimed at 'initiating and concluding a strategic agreement' with FBB." http://t.uani.com/142C1S6
 
MTN Banner 
Cyber Warfare

Bloomberg: "A previously unknown hacking group believed to be based in Iran has started cyber attacks inside the U.S., according to Mandiant Corp., a security company that's linked China's army to similar activity. The Iranian group emerged within the last six months and has infiltrated the networks of at least one U.S. corporation, Richard Bejtlich, Mandiant's chief security officer, said in an interview in Washington today. 'You're starting to see the Iranians get more active,' Bejtlich said. 'We've got at least one case where we think it's Iran, and we think what they are doing is trying to gain some experience on a live network.'" http://t.uani.com/13l1mUr

Sanctions

Bloomberg: "South Korea, the world's fifth-largest oil importer, cut crude shipments from Iran by 51 percent in April from a year earlier, customs data show. Purchases last month were 507,821 metric tons, compared with 1.04 million tons a year earlier, according to data on the Korea Customs Service's website today. The volume was 556,658 tons in March, the figures showed. The April deliveries were equivalent to about 124,000 barrels a day." http://t.uani.com/100VP4J

Domestic Politics

NYT: "On Monday, Iran's national deputy police commander, Esmael Ahmadi Moghaddam, was quoted by the newspaper Shargh as issuing a warning to President Ahmadinejad and Mr. Mashaei that the 'shedding of blood is allowed' if they do not stop claiming to take their orders from the Shiite messiah. The message, wrapped in ideological and religious wording, is the strongest indication yet that Mr. Ahmadinejad's faction could be purged, after or even during the elections... Mr. Mashaei, 52, and Mr. Ahmadinejad have hinted in speeches at a personal relationship with the Shiite messiah, the 12th imam... Also on Monday, the top editor of the country's influential state-run newspaper invoked the rallying cry of a notorious pressure group whose members shout 'Hezbollah Mashallah,' or 'Well done, Hezbollah,' as they use violence against political opponents. 'If they again have the idea of creating disturbances, they must know that the devotees, Hezbollah, will not allow them to do so even for a few hours,' he wrote in a column headlined 'Hezbollah Mashallah,' warning the two rogue candidates." http://t.uani.com/142CUtY

Foreign Affairs

Reuters: "Iran on Tuesday defended its election as the rotating chair of the world's sole multilateral disarmament forum after the United States announced that its ambassador to the U.N. Conference on Disarmament would boycott any meeting led by Tehran. The U.N. Conference on Disarmament has been deadlocked for about 15 years. While the chairmanship of the Geneva-based body is largely ceremonial, it is a high-profile position... Erin Pelton, spokeswoman for the U.S. mission to the United Nations, said on Monday that the selection of Iran was 'unfortunate and highly inappropriate.' She said countries under U.N. sanctions for arms proliferation or human rights abuses should be barred from such formal or ceremonial U.N. posts." http://t.uani.com/12uFfNW

Globe & Mail: "Canada is boycotting Iran's turn as the rotating chair of the Conference on Disarmament, the international organization that discusses disarmament issues. It's a repeat of the walkout tactic that the Harper Conservatives used against North Korea in 2011 - sitting out the sessions when a country that Ottawa views as a disarmament scofflaw takes the gavel. Ottawa argues that Iran 'subverts the fundamental principles' of the conference by shipping arms to such countries as Syria, Iraq and Lebanon. Canada acted alone when it boycotted North Korea's presidency two years ago, but this time the United States says it will skip meetings chaired by Iran as well." http://t.uani.com/13xdzJa

NYT: "Rarely, if ever these days, do you hear the United States making nice with Russia and Iran at the United Nations... A dream team of American wrestlers is scheduled to face the supreme wrestlers of Iran and then Russia in the main hall at Grand Central Terminal at 3:30 p.m. Wednesday - all part of a unified effort to save wrestling as an Olympic sport... It is not the first such competition. The United States has sent teams to Iran almost a dozen times, and Iran has reciprocated. In February, Jordan Burroughs, 24, the American Olympic gold medalist, said he was mobbed in Tehran by screaming fans when he went for the World Cup. Even President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad showed up to shake his hand." http://t.uani.com/16zvWQT

Opinion & Analysis

Mohsen Milani in Foreign Affairs: "In normal presidential elections, it is only the candidates and their platforms that matter. Not so in Iran. There, the key player in the upcoming presidential elections is the septuagenarian supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who is constitutionally barred from running for the office. He recognizes that the election result will have a profound impact on his own rule and on the stability of the Islamic Republic. So behind the scenes, he has been doing everything in his power to make sure that the election serves his interests. But the eleventh-hour declarations of candidacy by Hashemi Rafsanjani, Iran's president between 1989 and 1997, and by Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's chief of staff and close confidant, have made his task more difficult... Mashaei is the easier case. Ahmadinejad dreams of using him to pull a Putin-Medvedev trick, in which the latter wins a term as president, lets the former rule from behind the scenes, and then supports Ahmadinejad's return to power when the time is right. But things are unlikely to play out that way: Ahmadinejad has far too many enemies to stay around for long. He was a 'useful idiot' for Khamenei, who, as parliamentarian Ali Motahari has said, was supported 'as an effective instrument for eliminating Hashemi [Rafsanjani] and the reformists.' In addition, Mashaei is intensely disliked by conservatives and Khamenei. He has been vilified for propagating a 'deviant current,' which supposedly rejects direct rule by the clerics and champions Iranian nationalism as opposed to Islamism. Khamenei issued a decree four years ago that prohibited Ahmadinejad from appointing Mashaei as first vice president. Mashaei, undaunted by the odds, officially declared his candidacy over the weekend. If the Guardian Council disqualifies him, that would leave Mashaei with two options: ask Ahmadinejad to interrupt by postponing the elections or go down quietly, supporting his other, less known, supporters in the race. Given Khamenei's stern warnings that he will tolerate no mischief, Ahmadinejad surely knows that he will be dealt with harshly if he foments trouble. Khamenei also has to deal with the complex case of Rafsanjani. A seasoned statesman, the cunning 78-year-old Rafsanjani was close to Ayatollah Khomeini and has been a friend of Khamenei's since the pre-revolutionary period, when both men where part of Khomeini's secret network inside Iran. Khamenei and Rafsanjani engineered Khamenei's selection as supreme leader after Khomeini died, and the two men worked closely together when Rafsanjani served as president in the 1990s. Their relationship began to deteriorate after the 2005 election, when Ahmadinejad defeated Rafsanjani. Rafsanjani implied that the election had been fraudulent, but did not pursue the allegation. Ties were weakened further after the 2009 election, when Khamenei declared that he was ideologically closer to Ahmadinejad than to Rafsanjani; he then accused Rafsanjani of masterminding the Green Movement and barred him from delivering Friday prayer sermons. Rafsanjani also lost his position as Chairman of the Assembly of Experts for Leadership and two of his children were jailed. As soon as Rafsanjani declared his intention to run in the upcoming election, he was pressured to back down. Khamenei is right to be worried about Rafsanjani: Rafsanjani is the only candidate with the prerequisite skills, vision, savvy, and popular support to pose a serious challenge should he win the election. He has a developed network of supporters inside the government, the Revolutionary Guards, and the clerical establishment. Khatami has endorsed him, and all major reformist organizations could be expected to support him as well. He has pledged to moderate Iranian foreign policy and resolve the nuclear impasse. He has also declared that Iran is 'not at war with Israel,' but would join the Arabs if they declared war. Finally, he has stated that the legitimacy of the supreme leader emanates not just from God but also from the will of people. As part of the smear campaign to discredit Rafsanjani, Khamenei's older brother labeled the former president 'the best individual for American conspiracy against the Islamic Republic.' To immunize himself against such attacks, Rafsanjani declared that he would run only if the supreme leader did not object -- and, reportedly, he has not. It would be difficult (although not unfathomable) for the Guardian Council to now disqualify Rafsanjani. After all, he has consistently held the most sensitive positions in the Islamic Republic, ranging from acting Commander of the Armed Forces to Speaker of the Majlis to the presidency... Should Khamenei's strategy succeed, leaving him with the president of his choice, he will further consolidate his control of the government. This will intensify the lingering tensions between the state and Iran's vibrant civil society, which demands political reform, accountability, and freedom. With a pliant president, meanwhile, Khamenei could also indirectly influence the elections for the Assembly of Experts for Leadership, scheduled for 2014. This body has the power to remove Khamenei or, in the case of his death, select his successor. A trusted next president would also guarantee continuity in Khamenei's nuclear strategy and unwavering support for Syria, his top two priorities. If, however, Khamenei's strategy does not succeed, and Rafsanjani wins the presidency, Khamenei's further consolidation of power will become more difficult. Rafsanjani's victory could help bridge the divide among the elites that was created after the disputed election of 2009 and that, in turn, could lead to a slight opening of the political process. It also could increase the chances for a peaceful resolution of Iran's nuclear dispute with the West. To be effective, though, Rafsanjani, or whoever wins the presidency, must ultimately still collaborate with Khamenei. For the time being, then, Khamenei will remain Iran's final decider, however the upcoming elections play out." http://t.uani.com/11EmMBS

Michael Miner in RCW: "Rafsanjani's entry into the election posits two important questions that merit serious consideration. First, would Rafsanjani not have entered the election if he did not have the blessing of Khamenei? That is unlikely, as far too much of his wealth and power is tied into the system to upset the delicate balance of power between two of the most influential political families in Iran. Secondly, is it possible Khamenei consented to such a scenario in the interest of maintaining the status quo? Many, would argue just the opposite -- that Rafsanjani and the reformists who will support him, including former President Mohammad Khatami, pose a threat to the system. Contrary to that notion, the fervent supporters of Ahmadinejad's ally Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei pose the gravest threat to a carefully orchestrated political order. Khamenei may tacitly support Rafsanjani not out of the hope that he will win, but that he will at least keep the secular nationalists at bay. Should he actually win, the interests of those whom first established the Islamic Republic would be well looked after, and especially the powerful clerical establishment who cemented their authority with the constitutional referendum of 1989. Political intrigue and heated debate will bring domestic politics to the fore of discussion among Iranians in the coming month. The mainstream narrative suggests Rafsanjani has shaken up the political landscape and will represent a major challenge for hardliners loyal to Khamenei and the system. The question Iranians must ask themselves is: just how shaken up could it possibly be?" http://t.uani.com/YVKZlq

Omid Djalili in The Guardian: "Today is the fifth anniversary of the unjust imprisonment of seven Bahá'í leaders in Iran. They were jailed for 20 years for no reason other than their beliefs - the longest jail terms handed down against any prisoners of conscience in the country - and today I'm sending a message to Iran: even five years are too many. A global campaign is under way to remind Iran that it has legal and moral obligations to treat its religious minorities with justice - the Five Years Too Many campaign. But for decades Iran has walked all over the human rights of its citizens. The persecution of religious minorities is at the heart of this violence. Iran's religious minorities are arrested on fatuous charges, endure trials that violate the state's own due process, are jailed on unproven convictions and tortured in prison. Converts from Islam are branded apostates. Homes, businesses and places of worship are raided and torn apart. Students are kicked out of university because of their beliefs. And cemeteries are desecrated so not even the dead can escape. And yet Iran is signed up to international treaties and covenants on human rights; the government has broken its bond. The abuse hits other religious minorities, too - the Yarsan Kurds; Gonabadi Dervishes, who are Shia Muslims; and Christians. The seven Bahá'í leaders - Fariba Kamalabadi, Jamaloddin Khanjani, Afif Naeimi, Saeid Rezaie, Mahvash Sabet, Behrouz Tavakkoli and Vahid Tizfahm - were held for months without charge after their 2008 arrest and were finally subjected to a series of trials that made a mockery of justice. Ministry of Intelligence agents had cameras in the courtroom but international observers and family members were barred from the proceedings. And yet the Bahá'í leaders have not languished in prison. Mahvash Sabet has written poetry inside her Evin cell, now published in English. Roxana Saberi, the Iranian-American journalist made famous in 2009 because of her unjust incarceration in Iran, shared a prison cell with Sabet and Kamalabadi. 'They showed me what it means to be selfless, to care more about one's community and beliefs than about oneself,' Saberi later said of the two women. But the seven are living a daily grind of deprivation, overcrowded prison cells and exposure to the abuse of their captors. They have 15 years to go. The eldest among the seven, Khanjani, is 80 years old. His wife of more than 50 years passed away after his incarceration - he was unable to see her a final time or attend the funeral." http://t.uani.com/16zvZMI

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

No comments:

Post a Comment