Sunday, August 24, 2014
Saudi Arabia's bombshell
In a startling development, Saudi Arabia has blamed Hamas for the
current bloodshed with Israel. Saudi monarch, King Abdullah has publicly
accused Hamas of being responsible for the war between Gaza and Israel.
'It is shameful and disgraceful that these terrorists are doing this in
the name of religion, killing the people, whose killing Allah has
forbidden, and mutilating their bodies, and feeling proud in publishing
this. They have distorted the image of Islam with its purity and
humanity and smeared it with all sorts of bad qualities by their
actions, injustice, and crimes'. The ninety-year-old King Abdullah
accused Hamas of being responsible for a 'collective massacre'. His
statement, read by a news announcer, is representative of what other
countries like Egypt, Jordan, the Gulf States (except for Qatar), and
many Lebanese feel about the confrontation with radical Islam that is
being confronted mainly by Israel.
It should serve as a wake-up call to the Obama administration,
particularly to Foggy Bottom, whose diplomats and analysts seem to be
lagging behind Middle East developments. The battle with radical Islam
is not being waged solely with Islamic State in Iraq, Syria, and now
Lebanon, but also in Gaza. Israel's Prime Minister, Bibi Netanyahu,
should reciprocate with a diplomatic initiative to try and resolve the
differences with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who professes to
seek a diplomatic solution to the Israeli- Palestinian conflict.
The statement by the Saudi monarch is an historic signal to Israel
of where it stands now. Therefore, Netanyahu should accept the Saudi
challenge, even if it means a breakup of his coalition government, which
is dependent on hardliners like Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, and
Economic Minister Naftali Bennett. Meanwhile in Gaza it may get worse
before it gets better!
After its rejection of the latest Egyptian ceasefire proposal, Hamas
launched salvos of rockets and mortars into Israel. On August 19th, our
assessment was that Israel was 'really about to take off the gloves'.
Indeed, within 24 hours another Israeli air raid killed three more top
commanders after Israeli intelligence had tracked them down. (Although
denying that Israeli jets had previously killed Mohammed Deif, its
commander in chief, Hamas has failed to show any sign that he escaped
unscathed - this would appear to indicate that Deif was indeed killed or
seriously wounded). Overnight, the Hamas command structure lost four of
its top commanders. Hamas panicked, and with good reason - Israeli
intelligence had scored a major coup that could be chalked up to
electronic surveillance or possibly spies inside the senior Hamas
command.
Connect the dots between Hamas and IS
Obviously stunned, Hamas escalated its rocketing of Israel, and then
took a page out of the Islamic State's book of atrocities in Iraq. They
rounded up 25 'suspects' who were lined up against the wall and shot
dead. A Hamas statement declared that, ‘from now on, traitors will not
be brought to court!’ If the victims were indeed Israel 'spies', why
would Hamas have waited, and how could Hamas have carried out a serious
investigation in less than 24 hours? Obviously, Hamas had selected the
suspects at random, and wanted to strike terror into the hearts of all
the population of Gaza. The medium was the message: Hamas is as strong
as ever despite the loss of the top commanders, and will brook no
disloyalty or criticism.
It was bound to happen sometime and it was painful when it did.
4 year-old, Daniel Tragerman, was killed by a mortar bomb while
playing inside his home near the Gaza border. When Hamas fire rockets
from Gaza, Israeli civilians have up to fifteen seconds to race to their
bomb shelters before they land. However, mortar bombs give even less
time, barely five seconds, and Iron Dome is not designed to intercept
them. His father did manage to rush with a smaller child to their
protected room but the mortar landed before he could save his son. The
mortar landed just outside their kibbutz home and shrapnel critically
wounded Daniel who died a short time later. Aware that Iron Dome cannot
cope with mortars that give almost no warning time, Hamas has been
pummeling Israeli communities along the border. (Incidentally, some
foreign news agencies describe them as 'settlements', which can give the
wrong impression. The communities are located on undisputed Israeli
land along the border with Gaza).
When the last five-day ceasefire went into effect, many Israeli
women and children moved back to their homes, only to face a new barrage
of mortars. Up until now, families in the region have made their
decisions about whether the women and children should leave for safer
havens in Israel until the hostilities end. Now for the first time,
Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon has said that government services will
provide alternate housing for those who choose to leave until the
situation quiets down.
Hamas admits executing three Israeli youths
At long last, Hamas chief Khaled Meshaal has admitted that Hamas
terrorists did execute three Israeli youths in the West Bank, the
atrocity that triggered the current conflagration. But Meshaal was
careful to claim that he did not know beforehand, like he was unaware of
the latest plot to overthrow Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas that
was uncovered recently by Israel.
I can hear those who are asking: 'Why is Israel so upset when one
Israeli child is killed by a Hamas mortar, when hundreds of Palestinian
children have been killed by Israeli aircraft?
For this reason: Israel takes
unprecedented steps not to harm Palestinian children, certainly far more
than the U.S. and its NATO partners have in the Middle East. On the
other hand, Hamas not only uses Palestinian children as human shields,
but the terrorists try to deliberately rocket Israeli kids. Moreover,
Hamas started this round when its members kidnapped the three young
Israelis and shot them in the head. Does this not recall the IS
execution of American journalist James Foley in Iraq? In addition, try
connecting the dots between the Hamas execution of 25 Palestinians in
Gaza and the IS atrocities in Iraq.
So Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal was feeling the heat when he rejected
any comparison with IS in his interview with Yahoo News: ‘We are not a
religious, violent group - IS is a totally different phenomenon’.
Really? So is Meshaal unaware of what is written in his own Hamas
covenant? Article 7: "The Day of Judgment will not come until Muslims
fight Jews and kill them. Then the Jews will hide behind rocks and
trees, and the rocks and trees will cry out: 'O Muslim, there is a Jew
hiding behind me, come and kill him." If this is not religious
fanaticism and genocidal violence, what is?
It gets better (or worse). Article 8 of the Hamas Covenant also
reiterates the credo of its ally in Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood:
"Allah is the goal, the Prophet is the model, the Koran its
constitution, jihad its path, and death for the sake of Allah its most
sublime belief." Therefore according to Meshaal's convoluted
explanation, it follows that neither is the Muslim Brotherhood a
religious, violent group. Tell it to Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el
Sisi.
The proportionality ploy
Israel is taken to task for far more Palestinians being killed than
Israelis - Hamas and the UN tell us that some 2,000 Palestinians have
been killed. Somehow they and the news reports never subtract the
estimated 750 to 1,000 terrorists the IDF estimates have been killed in
the fighting. On the other hand, only four Israeli civilians have been
killed along with 64 soldiers. The fact that the Palestinians have
repeatedly refused to halt the rocketing, and therefore bear
responsibility for the Palestinian civilian deaths seems to cut no ice -
unless the critics feel Israel has no right to fight back.
Some British, and even American, interviewers keep asking why so
many Palestinians and so few Israelis have died in the fighting. This is
how it goes: 'It's disproportional and that violates international
law!' There are some other statistics worth noting: In the past 47 days,
Hamas and the other ‘non-religious’ and ‘non-violent’ terrorists in
Gaza have launched an estimated 3,800 rockets at the Jewish state. IDF
intelligence, which should be considered fairly reliable after taking
out four top Hamas commanders, estimates that 600 of those rockets have
been launched close to schools, mosques, hospitals, and other public
buildings. Many more have been fired from inside populated areas.
The IDF has disclosed that it conducted some 5,000 strikes on terror
targets, destroying Hamas control centers, rocket arsenals and
production facilities, as well as hitting rocket squads caught in the
act. So, if an estimated 1,400 Palestinian civilians have been killed in
5,000 IDF attacks, doesn't that mean that one Palestinian civilian was
killed for every three Israeli raids? If, as the Palestinians and the
critics charge, Israel is deliberately targeting Palestinian civilians,
the Israeli pilots would be lousy shots. On the contrary, what it proves
is that they carried out their mission with great precision and caution
in trying not to hit civilians who were being exploited as human
shields in one of the most densely populated areas of the world.
Are those air strikes necessary?
In the past two days alone, Hamas has launched no less than 200
rockets and mortars at Israel. Can you imagine air raid sirens blaring
and frantic Israeli children racing dozens of times a day and night for
their bomb shelters? I apologize for what might seem to be a heartless
analysis of civilian deaths and suffering. Nonetheless, facts remain
facts. It is also true that the killing of innocent civilians,
particularly children, is abominable no matter which side they're on.
Today, in order to survive in our ancient homeland, an enemy such as
Hamas, deliberately forces us to kill Palestinian children. The truth
will come out - Hamas is a brutal and vicious Islamist force that knows
no limits in achieving its fanatical goals; terrorists who have also
shown no qualms in throwing their Fatah rivals off high-rise buildings,
or tossing them from second or third floors just to break their legs.
Knee- capping is also deemed a suitable punishment.
Now Hamas has adopted another tactic of terror - the round up of 25,
probably innocent, Palestinians and their execution in front of the
cameras. It is as if the Islamists, Hamas or IS, revel in the barbarity
and sadism of their actions, that are all in the service of Allah. The
photos of the IS terrorist, with the London accent, lording it over
American journalist James Foley before beheading him has become iconic
in representing the free world's clash with Islamist terrorism. It has
depicted what is at stake and the security services of Britain, France,
Australia, Canada, and many other countries, whose citizens have joined
Islamic State, and are undoubtedly burning the midnight oil in trying to
cope with what has become a clear and present danger. Hopefully the
Obama administration also seems to be waking up to the fact that this is
what President el Sisi is confronting in Egypt.
David Essing
No comments:
Post a Comment