MESA Attacks
Efforts to Reform Title VI of the Higher Education Act
by Winfield Myers
• Sep 18, 2014 at 4:28 pm
Be the first of your
friends to like this.
Yesterday ten organizations, including the Middle East Forum, announced an effort
to educate
Congressional leaders and policy makers on the need to reform
federally-funded Title VI Middle East studies centers, which have for years
produced biased, anti-American and anti-Israel material.
Predictably, Amy W. Newhall, executive
director of the Middle East Studies Association (MESA), responded
not by countering the signatories' charges, but by attacking their
character and motives.
Newhall claimed "MESA resolutely opposes all forms of hate speech
and discrimination, including anti-Semitism." In fact, "It
supports prompt and forceful action in response to anti-Semitic incidents
on college and university campuses."
Were this true, MESA would have condemned flagrantly anti-Semitic
statements by Joseph
Massad and Hamid
Dabashi of Columbia, Ali Mazrui of SUNY
Binghamton, As'ad
AbuKhalil of Cal State Stanislaus, and countless
others. Yet it consistently defends
such speech rather than condemning it.
She next offered this bit of sophistry:
MESA is concerned that some of the reports issued by partisan political
groups based outside academia may actually weaken efforts to combat
anti-Semitism by portraying all criticism of Israeli policies as a form of
anti-Semitism or as "anti-Israel."
A touching sentiment disproved by MESA's silence in the face of genuine
anti-Semitism, as noted above. Plus, the participating organizations never
suggest that criticism of Israeli policies is anti-Semitic or anti-Israel.
Newhall proffers the intellectually lazy claim that:
Their real goal seems to be to shut down open discussion of issues of
public concern by demonizing academic and other critics of Israel, Zionism,
and U.S. policy in the Middle East, in many cases by tarring them with the
brush of anti-Semitism.
This view exempts the professoriate from the kind of criticism expected
by other professionals, including businessmen, attorneys, politicians, and
actors. Moreover, the organizations involved have neither the desire nor
ability to "shut down open discussion" of anything.
Finally, Newhall charges:
[The signatories] are even willing to threaten federal funding for
university-based Middle East studies centers, which have a long and
distinguished history of providing the United States with thousands of
people trained in the languages, politics, cultures and histories of this
critical region."
As Campus Watch
and others
have demonstrated,
Title VI centers produce politicized, biased
research with disturbing regularity.
MESA itself has thwarted Title VI's mission by
boycotting
Department of Defense funds for language programs, including immediately
following the terrorist attacks of 9/11, when the need for expertise in
Middle Eastern languages and cultures was dire. This bias against efforts
to strengthen national security continues: MESA's web site states
that, "MESA publications will not accept advertising from defense
and intelligence related agencies from any government."
Newhall's shrill attacks on efforts to reform Title VI of the Higher
Education Act reveal the radicalism of the Middle East studies
establishment she represents.
This
text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral
whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author,
date, place of publication, and original URL.
Related Items
|
No comments:
Post a Comment