In this mailing:
- Raymond Ibrahim: "Don't Dare
Sit with Us if You Want to Live"
- Amir Taheri: Iraq: An Election
of Conflicting Interests
by Raymond Ibrahim • February 25,
2018 at 5:00 am
- "They get paid
for every Coptic Christian girl they bring in. In some cases,
police provide the kidnappers with drugs they seize. The drugs
are then given to the girls to weaken their resistance... I
even know of cases in which police offered helped to beat up
the girls to make them recite the Islamic creed." — World
Watch Monitor, Egypt; September 14, 2017.
- On September 14, a
court sentenced a Christian man to death for
"blasphemy" against the prophet of Islam. Nadeem
James, a 27-year-old father of two, was originally arrested in
July 2016, after a Muslim angry with him for personal reasons
falsely accused James, who is illiterate, of texting a poem
deemed "blasphemous" of Muhammad. — Pakistan.
- School textbooks
taught her that "it was the Christians who wanted to
plunder the lands and the riches of the Muslim world" and
Turks merely responded by "defend[ing] what was
rightfully theirs." (In reality, modern day Turkey
consists of territory that was Christian for more than a
thousand years before it was conquered by Turks in the name of
jihad.) "Everything is used to make the Christians look
like villains," she said, adding, "It's the same all
through Muslim countries." — Turkey.
Indonesia
joined other repressive Muslim nations in May 2017 when it
sentenced the Christian governor of Jakarta, known as
"Ahok," to a two-year prison term on the charge that he
committed "blasphemy" against Islam. Pictured: Ahok on
the day of his election, February 15, 2017. (Photo by Oscar
Siagian/Getty Images)
Muslim Slaughter of Christians
by Amir Taheri • February 25,
2018 at 4:00 am
Nuri
al-Maliki (center), then Iraqi Prime minister, with other lawmakers
on June 14, 2010, at the first parliament session after the 2010
election, in Baghdad, Iraq. (Photo by Muhannad Fala'ah /Getty
Images)
Almost 15 years after the war that ended Saddam
Hussein's rule in Iraq, the circumstances that led to it and the
way it was conducted remain controversial. However, even the most
ardent opponents of the war admit that the end of dictatorship in
Baghdad gave Iraq an opportunity to seek a different, hopefully
better, future which might include democratization.
While it is true that democracy cannot be imposed by
force it is equally true that force could be used to remove
barriers to democracy as was the case in Germany, Italy and Japan
after the Second World War.
In that context the fact that since 2003 Iraq has
held several free and fair elections and referendums is cited as
proof that anti-democracy barriers erected by successive despotic
regimes in Baghdad may have been removed.
However, elections alone, even when free and fair,
do not amount to democratization.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment