Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Eye on Iran: Elections Gains Unlikely to Shift Iran Power Balance Fast








Join UANI  
 Like us on Facebook  Follow Us on Twitter View our videos on YouTube
   
 
Top Stories

Reuters: "Impressive gains by Iranian President Hassan Rouhani in heavily handicapped elections to parliament and a clerical body are evidence of an isolated nation eager to move from theocracy to a more open democracy, but few expect a sudden shift in power. The Islamic Republic's unique dual system of clerical and republican rule places decisive power in the hands of a conservative Islamic establishment, which has shown in the past its ability to reassert control when it feels threatened. Rouhani may have a stronger hand to open up an economy ravaged by a decade of sanctions, but his scope to permit more social and political freedom is constrained by hardliners' control of the judiciary, security forces and state media. The scale of gains by Rouhani's supporters was undoubtedly a setback for hawks opposed to any opening to the West. Prominent critics of Iran's nuclear deal with world powers were defeated. Centrists and reformers not only bounced back in a parliament under hardline control since 2004, but won a stunning 15 out of the 16 Tehran seats in the 88-member Assembly of Experts, which selects Iran's supreme leader. Two key hardliners including the speaker of the powerful clerical body were ousted. Rouhani's allies took all 30 parliamentary seats in Tehran, though their gains outside the capital were more limited, with conservatives keeping many seats in both bodies. An unofficial tally by Reuters of first round results for the 290-member Majlis (parliament) show conservatives won about 112 seats, reformers and centrists 90 and independents and religious minorities 29. There will be run-offs in April in 59 districts where no one won more than 25 percent of the vote. The numbers are approximate because Iran does not have rigid party affiliations. Some candidates were backed by both camps. The advances came despite the disqualification of thousands pro-reform candidates by an unelected clerical Guardian Council that reports directly to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 'The results in Tehran reflect a reformist orientation and focus on improvements in the economy and foreign relations,' said one Tehran-based analyst who requested anonymity. 'Rouhani will bring more order to the economy and greater openness in foreign policy but the overall structure and approach will not be altered. The vocabulary will be different, but the balance of power will not shift,' he said." http://t.uani.com/1WToQgF

Free Beacon: "Early election results from Iran indicate that the country elected on Friday another crop of hardline officials, including those who have expressed hatred for the United States and Israel and who stand accused of planning the murder of political opponents, according to information provided by organizations that observed the elections. As the names of those officials who won a seat on Iran's Assembly of Experts and other governing bodies begins to emerge, experts say it is becoming clear that hardline extremists will continue to control the Iranian government. While some western media outlets have claimed that reformists made inroads in the latest election, regional experts explained that this is not the case, as moderate political camps ultimately endorsed on their voting lists more hardline candidates aligned with the Iranian ruling regime... 'Radicals dominated the Assembly of Experts, as expected,' said Amir Toumaj, an Iran analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. 'The Guardian Council engineered the field so it would be that way.' Most of those who were prevented from running include those who have advocated warmer ties with Western powers. 'The bulk of the disqualified candidates represent comparatively pragmatic elements of the ruling elite-among them Hassan Khomeini, grandson of Ruhollah Khomeini, the Islamic Republic's late founder and first supreme leader,' Saeed Ghasseminejad, also an Iran expert at FDD, wrote in a policy brief last week. 'On the other hand, most of the approved contenders are radical revolutionaries - devotees of the supreme leader with close ties to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC),' he wrote. 'It is mathematically impossible for the less-hardline factions to win at the ballot box.'" http://t.uani.com/1WTm8HN

Daily Caller: "The Iranian elections are being hailed as a victory for moderates, and therefore President Barack Obama's nuclear deal, but according to experts, the so-called moderate victory is not what it seems. Iranians took to the polls Friday in what could be one of the most important elections in the country's history. As soon as vote counts rolled in, it appeared the so-called moderates, led by President Hassan Rouhani and former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, had secured a victory. The problem is that many of the moderates are moderate in name only, according to experts. 'There were a number [of candidates] ... that weren't really moderate,' Matt McInnis, a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a former senior analyst for the U.S. Department of Defense specializing in Iran, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. He explained the idea that moderates won a victory over hardliners is 'not really accurate' based on the fact that a significant portion of the true moderates were barred from running before the election even began... Countering reports of a moderate win, Saeed Ghasseminejad, a fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies specializing in Iranian politics, told TheDCNF, 'in the Assembly of Experts election the hardliners (radical revolutionaries) won decisively.' 'The confusion on this issue is caused by the fact that reformists who did not have enough candidates filled their list with hardliners, who were already on the hardliners' list, in order to defeat a handful of hardliners,' said Ghasseminejad. He explained that though there were some small victories in the districts around the capital of Tehran, which was expected, those results were not reflective of the country as a whole. 'In the Majles, the hardliners and the so-called reformers are tied. However, many candidates supported by the reformers are anything but reformer, even by the Islamic Republic standard,' he said. Both experts agree the election won't prompt any real change to U.S-Iranian relations." http://t.uani.com/21zD7pg

Nuclear Program & Agreement

PressTV (Iran): "Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif says the Islamic Republic will continue to develop its missile program and that Tehran needs 'no permission' to enhance the country's defense capabilities. 'We have announced that we will not ask permission from anyone to [strengthen] our defense and missile capability,' Zarif said in an interview with Iranian Students' News Agency, ISNA, on Sunday. The top Iranian diplomat went on to say that the country's missile program does not breach the July nuclear agreement struck between Tehran and six world powers and that the deal does not ban Iran from boosting its defense capabilities... Zarif said that Iran's missile program will continue apace and will be provided with all necessary materials and equipment. He further dismissed as 'unacceptable' claims by US officials that the Islamic Republic's missile tests are in breach of the UN Security Council Resolution 2231, saying none of the Iranian missiles have been designed to carry 'nuclear warheads.' On October 11, Iran's Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) successfully test-fired its first guided ballistic missile dubbed Emad." http://t.uani.com/1TOv2Hh

Military Matters

FP: "We can add Iran to the list of countries that have dropped munitions in anger over the past year, now that an arms researcher has been able to geolocate video of an Iranian drone striking targets near Aleppo, Syria. On Feb. 4, an Iranian news show broadcast a short piece highlighting how Iran's Revolutionary Guards have been using the Shahed 129 drone to monitor the country's southeast borders with Afghanistan and Pakistan. But as arms researcher Galen Wright points out, 'in addition to footage of the drones operating out of Konarak airport near Pakistan, the program featured two short clips of the aircraft striking targets south of Aleppo.'" http://t.uani.com/1RDu2DV

U.S.-Iran Relations

PressTV (Iran): "Touching upon Iran's relations with the United States, Zarif told ISNA that the US should abandon its 'mentality of sanctions.' 'We are still waiting to see whether the US is serious in its commitments' concerning the lifting of sanctions, he noted. Zarif further criticized Washington's 'wrong' policies in the Middle East region. 'US policies even harm their own interests in the region since they have caused unrest and created Daesh [terrorist group],' he noted. Zarif said that Iranian officials have reached no agreement with US officials on regional issues, saying Tehran would take a decision on extending talks with the US should Americans 'correct their policies.'" http://t.uani.com/1TOv2Hh

The Hill: "The House passed a resolution on Monday pressuring Iran to assist with finding a retired FBI agent who disappeared nearly a decade ago. Robert Levinson has been missing since March 2007, after traveling to Iran's Kish Island. 'Whatever information Iran has about Bob needs to be provided now so that Bob can be brought home,' said Rep. Ted Deutch (D-Fla.), who represents the Coral Springs-area district where Levinson lived. The measure, which passed by voice vote, specifically 'urges the Government of Iran, as a humanitarian gesture, to act on its promises to assist in the case of Robert Levinson.' ... 'Even as we rejoice in the safe return of others, we will never forget about Bob,' President Obama said at the time. 'Each and every day, but especially today, our hearts are with the Levinson family, and we will not rest until their family is whole again.'" http://t.uani.com/1pmF2fT

Sun Sentinel: "His clothes - folded in the dresser and hanging in the closet - haven't been touched in nine years. His pillow remains fluffed on his side of the bed. And his favorite ties - which his sons refuse to wear - are still in the proper place. Robert Levinson's family wants to make sure that when he comes home he recognizes his house in Coral Springs. And, 'we want to continue from where we left off,' said his wife, Christine Levinson. Next week marks nine years since Levinson - a retired FBI agent who was on a rogue CIA mission - was taken hostage in Iran. On Saturday, the family is hosting a rally asking the U.S. government and Iranian governments to work together to get him released. The Society of Former Special Agents of the FBI is a sponsor of the event, with current and former agents expected to attend. 'We want Bob Levinson's name to remain front and center in every discussion that takes place about Iran,' said U.S. Rep. Ted Deutch, D-Boca Raton, who will be speaking at Saturday's rally. 'We have to keep reminding everyone in our country, our allies around the world and especially Iran it's just not acceptable there is an American citizen that continues to be held.' ... Saturday's rally is open to the public and will be held at 2 p.m. at the Coral Springs Center for the Arts, 2855 Coral Springs Drive." http://t.uani.com/1oMhjVI

Fox News: "The Christian pastor from Idaho who was freed from Iran in January after more than three years told Fox News Monday his faith kept him strong in prison, and that he now plans to tour churches across the U.S. and document his harrowing experience in a book. Saeed Abedini, who converted from Islam to Christianity in 2000, was arrested and imprisoned in 2012 for opening churches in the Islamic Republic. Speaking to Martha MacCallum on 'America's Newsroom,' he said Iranian officials accused him of plotting regime change. Abedini recounted that he prayed in prison on America's behalf for 100 hours... Abedini said that seeing Hekmati in solitary confinement reduced him to tears. Abedini claimed he himself had just left solitary, and saw that the Marine had been a victim of torture at the hands of the Iranian regime. The pastor saw 'how much they really hate us, hate Americans, hate Christians,' he told Fox News." http://t.uani.com/1QRHAP7   

Sanctions Relief

Straits Times: "Singapore has signed an investment treaty with Iran to support Singapore companies in investing in the newly re-opened market. The treaty will also provide a legal framework to protect investors and promote investments between both countries. Singapore's Minister for Trade and Industry (Industry) S Iswaran signed an Agreement on Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments, also known as a bilateral investment treaty, with Iran's Minister of Finance and Economic Affairs Ali Tayyebnia on Monday (Feb 29) in Tehran. Singapore is the second country, after Japan, to sign a bilateral investment treaty with the Islamic Republic following the lifting of United Nations sanctions in mid-January this year. 'We look forward to strengthening bilateral economic ties with our businesses collaborating on opportunities of mutual interest in Iran and other markets,' said Mr Iswaran. He is in Tehran for a three-day visit from Feb 28 to explore new business and investment opportunities. His trip coincides with Singapore Business Federation (SBF)'s one-week mission to the capital city of Iran... According to the Ministry of Trade and Industry, Singapore's bilateral trade with Iran was S$6.6 billion in 2011, before the sanctions were imposed. They fell to S$2.6 billion in 2012 after the sanctions kicked in. By last year, bilateral trade had shrunk to S$171.4 million, with Singapore's exports to Iran at S$158 million while imports from Iran amounted to S$13.4 million... A total of 51 companies from various sectors such as oil and gas, petrochemicals, logistics and information communications technology have been in Tehran since last Friday, gaining first-hand knowledge about the business environment and investment opportunities here." http://t.uani.com/1QpYYII

Guardian: "Iran sold a light hydrocarbon liquid pumped from its South Pars fields to South Korea's Hanwha Total Petrochemicals Ltd., as the removal of sanctions help it challenge producers of similar supplies such as Qatar. The National Iranian Oil Co. will load in April a cargo of condensate to be shipped to the South Korean petrochemical maker, according to an official from the state-run producer in the Middle East nation. That's the first shipment of supply from the offshore South Pars natural gas fields to the Asian company, which had been purchasing Qatar's competing Deodorized Field Condensate while sanctions were in place on the Persian Gulf state." http://t.uani.com/1L2oMud

AP: "Iran's president on Tuesday called for foreign partnerships to boost the country's car industry and said the sector must be privatized to improve its competitiveness. President Hassan Rouhani told a car industry conference in a nationally broadcast speech that partnerships with international carmakers offer quick way to improve the industry's technology and safety. 'There is a shortcut ... We have to start partnerships with prominent world carmakers. We will reach to the optimum point in technology, protecting the environment, saving energy and safety,' Rouhani said. He said partnerships with foreign carmakers will serve the best interests of all sides, and increasing the competitiveness of the local market can only help strengthen the industry. 'The government will never be a good manager in industry, including the car industry. The sector should be completely privatized and competitive,' he said. 'The partnership will drive us ahead.' But he also warned that plan would mean removing government protections of the domestic car market such as prohibitions or heavy tariffs on imported vehicles. Rouhani said the days of the state-sponsored auto monopoly must end." http://t.uani.com/1QRGymi

Reuters: "Gains by reformist candidates in Iranian elections open the way for changes to economic policy that will boost foreign investment and trade with the West, businessmen and analysts said on Sunday. Friday's vote ended more than a decade of conservative domination of the legislature and the Assembly of Experts, a body that oversees the Islamic republic's supreme leader. The outgoing parliament, filled with hardliners suspicious of detente with the West, had acted as a brake on President Hassan Rouhani's plans to strengthen the private sector, tackle corruption and welcome foreign investors. Rouhani, the architect of last year's nuclear deal with world powers, is now expected to find it easier to push legislative reforms making the economy more attractive to foreign firms. 'In economic affairs the next parliament will be much better than the current parliament,' said Saeed Leylaz, an economist who served as advisor to reformist former president Mohammad Khatami. Iran faces deep problems including corruption, a shortage of investment and a lack of productivity, but 'all these problems can be solved through liberalizing the economy,' he said. Iranian investment banker Ramin Rabii said he expected the new parliament to address issues crucial to the business sector such as updating the country's commercial code, modernizing labor laws and improving stock market regulation. 'If you have a parliament that is friendlier to the executive branch, things tend to move forward more easily,' said Rabii, chief executive of investment group Turquoise Partners. 'When business-related regulations need to be passed, or joint venture agreements are signed with foreign partners and are scrutinized by parliament - it all goes more smoothly.' One early result of the elections could be to allow the government to offer new oil and gas contracts to foreign firms." http://t.uani.com/1oVXMCR

Business Risk

Reuters: "Iran still faces constraints on oil exports as buyers are cautious about boosting trade immediately because of banking and ship insurance difficulties, a senior Iranian oil official said, despite seeing a 'tangible' rise in shipments this month... The sanctions had cut Iranian crude exports from a peak of 2.5 million barrels per day (bpd) before 2011 to just over 1 million bpd in recent years. Iran is working to regain market share after sanctions relief and exports had already risen by 500,000 bpd in February, Mohsen Ghamsari, director of international affairs at National Iranian Oil Co (NIOC), told Reuters on Tuesday. But the country's crude shipments, particularly to Europe, have been complicated by a lack of clarity on ship insurance, dollar clearance and European banks' letters of credit. 'For March, definitely our volumes are going to be higher than February ... but it depends on the logistics situation and the banking channels. Still, some shipping companies are somehow reluctant to come and banks also,' he said in a telephone interview from Tehran... Litasco, the trading arm of Russia's Lukoil, Spanish refiner Cepsa and France's Total have become the first buyers in Europe since the lifting of sanctions, trading sources told Reuters. Ghamsari said those cargoes were trial shipments and NIOC had started negotiations for term contracts with potential buyers. 'Definitely in March you are going to see some good news for additional barrels or cargoes destined to Europe,' he said." http://t.uani.com/216HYc9

Reuters: "Frontline, one of the world's largest independent tanker firms, says securing insurance for cargoes carrying oil from Iran is likely to take another two to three months, potentially limiting Iran's ability to quickly ramp up oil exports... 'We have not lifted anything yet, there are still terms of insurance and payments. There are still some outstanding (issues). (But) we expect that to be in place within two to three months,' said Robert Hvide Macleod, chief executive of Oslo-listed Frontline. 'That could change, but two to three months (is) our estimate,' he told a conference call with investors on Monday. The United States still prohibits U.S. individuals or companies from trading with Iran and insurers are trying to clarify details on the parameters of the U.S. sanctions." http://t.uani.com/1OLJRns

Tasnim (Iran): "Commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Major General Mohammad Ali Jafari said development of the phases 15 and 16 of the South Pars gas field in southern Iran was a testimony to the IRGC's engineering skills and technical expertise. The world now acknowledges the IRGC's engineering and technical capabilities, which led to the glorious completion of two South Pars gas field phases after years of hard work, the top general said at a meeting in Iran's southern coastal region of Assaluyeh on Tuesday. He noted that inauguration of the two phases opened the way for the IRGC to undertake other engineering projects. According to the general, Khatam al-Anbia Construction Base, a conglomerate belonging to the IRGC, is working on three other phases of the offshore gas field." http://t.uani.com/1TkG2Or

Human Rights

IranWire: "An Iranian appeals court has sentenced two musicians and a filmmaker to three years in prison and a three-year suspended sentence on charges of 'insulting the sacred' and 'propaganda against the regime' in connection with the production and promotion of underground music. Branch 54 of Iran's Revolutionary Court, presided over by Judge Hassan Babaee, handed down the sentences to Mehdi Rajabian, a musician and founder of BargMusic, his brother Hossein Rajabian, an independent filmmaker, and Yousef Emadi, manager of BargMusic, on Sunday, February 28, 2016, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency.  The BargMusic website distributes alternative music across Iran and  promotes the work of Iranian artists and lyricists, including female soloists. The three artists were initially given a six-year prison sentence in December 2015 by Judge Mohammad Moghiseh of the 28th branch of the Revolutionary Court. They were also ordered to pay a fine of 200 million rials ($6,600), which was upheld by the appeals court... Emadi and the Rajabian brothers are among dozens of Iranian journalists, writers and artists arrested or sentenced to prison in the last couple of months." http://t.uani.com/1UwqdD2

Journalism Is Not a Crime: "The International Press Institute (IPI) has named Iranian journalist Ahmad Zeidabadi as its 68th World Press Freedom Hero for his courageous fight for freedom of expression, human rights and democracy in Iran. He was according to IPI's Executive Director Barbara Trionfi chosen for the award 'because of his exceptional courage, resilience and commitment to press freedom and freedom of expression in Iran, which in recent years has been one of the world's biggest jailers of journalists.' Zeidabadi, a prominent Iranian journalist, academic and political analyst, has suffered multiple arrests, imprisonment in solitary confinement, internal exile, and a lifelong ban on engaging in political activities and practicing journalism, due to his journalistic work. 'Zeidabadi has shown great bravery and determination in supporting reform in Iran in the face of continued oppression by an autocratic regime,' Trionfi said in a statement on February 29. 'We hope that recent political developments in the country signal positive change and that this award will serve to bring renewed attention to his story, as well as that of all journalists in Iran who have been persecuted for seeking to report the news and inform the public.'" http://t.uani.com/1oMhQqP

IranWire: "It all begins with a simple photograph on social media, an image that very quickly goes viral. It's a photo of yet another actor or director who is fleeing in Iran to pursue their dreams and a better life abroad, to escape to a place that promotes creative freedom and where theater and film professionals are assured they can work without interference. This mass exodus of movie and television stars and directors is, sadly, nothing new, dating back to the birth of the Islamic Republic itself. Recently, it has become a hot topic again, mainly because of social media and greater amounts of information being shared online. In fact, the free flow of information has in turn greatly accelerated the number of actors and directors leaving Iran, to the extent that it has become a considerable problem for the national broadcaster, Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), and for the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. Over the past few months, this wave of emigration has begun to worry officials, who refuse to accept that they are in any way responsible for it. But it is they who - rather than identifying the problem and solving it - have caused this war. Authorities clamp down on artists, and pick and choose who can and cannot appear on television. They issue strange and baffling directives and make unreasonable demands on artists. They block many actors from appearing on Iranian state-run television. Iranian female actors are very much on the frontline of this battle... Here, IranWire highlights the female actors who have made a stand, refusing to put up with the situation any longer." http://t.uani.com/24yQKUJ

Opinion & Analysis

Azadeh Moaveni in NYT: "I remember vividly the first time I ever voted in an Iranian election. It was a balmy summer day in June 2001, in the election that won the reformist president Mohammad Khatami a second term. The blue stamp was the first on the voting page of my identification card, and I felt a sharp, exhilarating pride. That election is much on my mind now, as I watch the results of Friday's voting with my family, disagreeing on what it might mean for the future. Back in 2001, Iran was heading down an irrevocable path toward internal reform, a process untainted by any Western intrusion, with citizens and progressive-minded leaders showing the way. Those leaders seemed, at the time, as exciting as Vaclav Havel and the revolutionary cleric Musa al-Sadr rolled into one. Elections felt - unlike the vote this past weekend - full of consequence, a genuine chance to recast political power rather than an exercise in slightly recalibrating it. Tehran then was a naïve young intellectual's paradise... The reformists in those days were punchy; they invoked Karl Popper, and said one day freedom would come to Iran, and we would all support the Palestinians and thumb our noses at the West and be a beacon of progress for the rest of the Middle East, which in those days was a political wasteland, the kind of place that 'didn't have politics.' In Tehran, dissidents didn't cower in the shadows as in Tunis or Cairo... But the seasoned correspondents in the Western press corps, I recall, were distinctly unmoved by all this fizz. They asked pedantic questions about constitutional reform, unelected institutions and parallel security services. They were no fun at all, and seemed to me, at the time, calcified cynics, immune to the buoyancy of Iranian youth and the vitality of the Tehran intelligentsia. They were unaffected by the revolutionary songs the students used to sing, songs that would bring me to tears, and didn't seem to appreciate how radical painting, avant-garde theater, and a highly sophisticated population, were reshaping Iran from below. A country was its people, I used to think. Today, I am the cynic. When anyone under 25, or anyone compulsively protective of the Islamic Republic, writes passionately about the state reforming on its own terms, about the choice between 'bad and worse,' I go cold. If the past 15 years have made anything clear, it is that meaningful, legislated change does not emerge out of grass-roots evolution. Iran has had it all: hadith-driven feminism, vibrant civil society, a culture of engagement with politics and a patience for slow, internal reform. If these were the key ingredients required for political change, Iran would have had it by now. The hard truth is that those things are not enough. A country is both its people and its leaders. Iran had important elections this past Friday, for Parliament and a key state institution, the Assembly of Experts. Moderate candidates won resoundingly in Tehran and they topped the list for the Assembly of Experts, a small humiliation for the hard-liners. But outside the capital, initial results indicate that the showing was not so buoyant, and we must remember that Iran has had a pro-reform Parliament and a moderate president before; that synergy did little in the face of the overwhelming structural and economic advantages the system affords hard-liners and their institutions. And now, they have had to make electoral deals with pragmatists, diluting the very notion of 'reformist' as a political category. The reform-minded in Tehran are energized, but their strategists talk of making the economy a priority and taming the extreme hard-liners, rather than pursuing social or political liberalization. The reformists who used to shake their fists and claim that Islam was on their side now speak about the importance of moving slowly, grateful simply to be out of prison. Genuine reformism, as a relevant intellectual and political culture or strategy, is effectively stalled, waiting for some major shift of circumstance, or the much dreamed-for hard-line retrenchment, to make it viable again... Now that Iran has rehabilitated itself by signing a nuclear deal with the West, the unyielding media images of a death-cult totalitarian land that I used to push back against have given way to elegant fashion spreads, lists of Persian foods that blow your tastes buds away and features touting skiing in Iran over the Alps. There is too little outrage that Tehran is holding another American citizen and imprisoning his aged father. Is the image of Iran that holds sway at any given moment tethered to any reality, or is it simply a projection of what we wish and require of it at the time? Many years ago, I was determined to see only the light in Iran, but now, perhaps like those before me who had friends imprisoned or had been watching long enough to know better, my gaze is drawn mostly to the shadows." http://t.uani.com/1L2qSdw

Katherine Bauer in WINEP: "In its first public statement on Iran since sanctions relief went into effect following implementation of the nuclear deal last month, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), whose thirty-seven members include Russia and China, in mid-February urged member states to warn their banks about the risks of doing business with Iran. Coming only a month after Iran received nuclear-related sanctions relief from the United Nations, United States, and European Union, the statement underscores the risks for European and Asian banks in renewing financial ties with Iran... Iran has been the subject of such statements since 2008, when the FATF revised its processes for dealing with 'high-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions.' However, despite the January lifting of U.S. and EU nuclear-related sanctions on Iran, the consensus-driven intergovernmental organization did not revise the statement it has issued three times a year since calling for member states to impose countermeasures on Iran in February 2009. The statement again urged Iran to 'immediately and effectively address its AML/CFT deficiencies,' noting that if Iran failed to do so, the FATF would consider calling on member states to strengthen countermeasures at its June 2016 meeting... The new FATF statement -- which continued to press member states to 'protect against correspondent relationships being used to bypass or evade counter-measures and risk-mitigation practices' -- came only days after the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) confirmed Iranian banks had been reconnected to the secure financial-messaging platform after having been cut off by EU sanctions in March 2012. Even with messaging services restored, however, the FATF's identification of Iran as a high-risk jurisdiction subject to FATF countermeasures will continue to complicate efforts by Iranian banks to reestablish ties upon which the majority of SWIFT messaging is predicated -- those with correspondents... What this all means is that sanctions relief and SWIFT readmission notwithstanding, significant impediments remain for those banks looking to reestablish financial ties with Iran. At a minimum, banks will continue to face illicit-finance and regulatory risks -- both conditions of Iran's own making." http://t.uani.com/1oMj8BZ
       

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

TUESDAY Security Update: Surrounded by SpecOps Legends, Navy SEAL Receives Medal of Honor

Click below for today's....

FSM Must Reads + 2012 site 
"The important thing I want to say here is that everything we do is as a team; if it wasn't for that team I wouldn't be standing here today."

They've disappeared in order to plot new jihad terror attacks (remember there were "refugees" among the Paris jihad killers in November) and that was just a harbinger of things to come.

What Islamists do know is that the weakness in the West is palpable.

Additionally, at several other bases the security cameras do not work, the security gates do not meet standards, and providing safe drinking water for the officers is a recurring problem.

Why should Americans care either way?

Just when you think President Obama's nuclear "deal" with Iran couldn't get any worse, it does.

Students and their professors make a mockery of free speech

Don't miss out on the latest

FSM video  picks + 2012 site

terrorists_usa_domestic

·  Heritage Senior Fellow: ‘Rise of Domestic Terrorism' is What Happens When We ‘Weaken National Identity'
·  Surrounded by SpecOps Legends, Navy SEAL Receives Medal of Honor
·  Ben Shapiro Says Campus Protest of His Speech Was 'the Fascist Left at Work'
·  World on Edge: 5000 trained Jihadists return to Europe after being trained at terror camps
·  DiCaprio Hypes Climate Change in Oscars Speech, Lefties Tweet Support
leonardo de caprio L


If you do not wish to receive any further e-mails, please click here to unsubscribe.   


REMINDER: Please "like" our Facebook page:

facebook

and

Don't forget to share some tweets!


twitter+bird+wink



donate now _button_blue

As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, The Family Security Foundation relies upon the thoughtfulness and (tax-deductible!) generosity of visitors like you.


PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SEND YOUR 100% TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION TO FAMILYSECURITYMATTERS.ORG
donate now _button_blue
10 year FSM Anniversary
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT OF FAMILYSECURITYMATTERS.ORG.
We certainly couldn't do it without you!

Checks may be sent here:

Family Security Foundation, Inc.
2020 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., #298
Washington, D.C. 20006 




Trump's Saddam Nostalgia

Middle East Forum
Promoting American Interests

Facebook  Twitter  RSS  Join Mailing List
Follow the Middle East Forum


Related Articles
·         Let Iraq handle Sunnis

Trump's Saddam Nostalgia

by A.J. Caschetta
The Daily Caller
February 29, 2016
Be the first of your friends to like this.
Clockwise from left: former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, the graves of his Kurdish victims in Halabja, and the graves of American soldiers who gave their lives attempting to build a better future for Iraq.
Remember when Sean Penn went to Iraq in December of 2002 in a bizarre attempt to meet with Saddam Hussein and prevent the inevitable U.S.-led invasion? Upon returning home, the activist/actor told Americans they were being lied to and that Iraq was "a happy place. They had flowery meadows and rainbow skies, and rivers made of chocolate, where the children danced and laughed and played with gumdrop smiles."
Actually that line comes from the parody of Sean Penn in Team America: World Police (2004). But Penn's actual performance in his greatest role as Saddam's "useful idiot" (the phrase is Lenin's) may be his most enduring work.
The assertion that the world would be better off if Saddam Hussein still ruled Iraq never went away entirely. But it reemerged with new relevance after Donald Trump lit into Jeb Bush in the February 13th Republican primary debate with accusations from the Code Pink playbook: President Bush knew there were no WMDs in Iraq and lied about it.
After the debate, Trump offered more to CNN: "Iraq used to be no terrorists. He (Hussein) would kill the terrorists immediately, which is like now it's the Harvard of terrorism...If you look at Iraq from years ago, I'm not saying he was a nice guy, he was a horrible guy, but it was a lot better than it is right now. Right now, Iraq is a training ground for terrorists."
Trump's nostalgia for Saddam Hussein's Iraq is a muddy and sentimental vision.
This selective and nostalgic look back at Saddam's Iraq is a muddy and sentimental vision, almost a form of amnesia in its failure to recall the threats Saddam posed. And it is entirely dependent on faulty logic.
The "hypothesis contrary to fact" fallacy occurs when an argument is made expressing with certainty how a situation would be different were the facts of history different (Trump's claim that the world would be "100 percent better" with Saddam). This sophistry assumes a priori only the best possible outcomes and ignores all others in a single-minded drive to prove a point.
Saddam nostalgia assumes that if 2003 went differently Saddam would have stopped invading his neighbors, trying to assassinate U.S. presidents, cheating on the UN inspections imposed by the surrender terms of 1991, and massacring Shiites and Kurds (America's one true ally in Iraq). Saddam murdered Kurds with special aplomb, as the 1988 chemical attack on the village of Halabja demonstrates.
But it ignores the possibility of a worse regime run by Saddam's heirs: Qusay, the efficient bureaucrat and Uday, the monster who brought the term "rape room" to the American lexicon.
It also ignores Saddam's funding of Palestinian and international terrorism. One can doubt the Czech Republic's claim that Mohammad Atta met in Prague with an Iraqi intelligence agent, but no one can refute the existence of Salmon Pak, Saddam's premier terrorism training center 15 miles south of Baghdad.
Those who deny Saddam's WMD threat often cite the final report of the Iraqi Survey Group (ISG), but James Lacey showed a decade ago that doing so requires focusing selectively on the report's assertion that no new stockpiles of WMDs were found while ignoring the assertion that Saddam "was preparing to rapidly reconstitute his WMD program the moment he broke out of sanctions."
The ISG report itself shows symptoms of Saddam nostalgia, for its assertion that the various nerve and mustard agents found in Iraq post-2003 did not constitute "a secret cache of weapons of mass destruction" overlooks the fact that Saddam successfully hid these prohibited weapons from UN inspectors throughout the post-Gulf War era.
Strangely, the absent-WMD narrative endures even after C.J. Chivers' detailed October 14, 2014 expose in The New York Times proved what many Iraq War vets know – there were many chemical weapons found in Iraq – the only dispute is over the vintage of those weapons.
And what of the 55,000 metric tons of yellowcake uranium (for which there is only one known use) quietly taken out of Iraq in the summer of 2008?
Finally, Saddam nostalgia ignores the debate over a massive transfer of something from Iraq to Syria that took place days prior to the 2003 invasion. The head of the National Imagery and Mapping Agency stated in 2003 that "satellite imagery showing a heavy flow of traffic from Iraq into Syria, just before the U.S. invasion in March, led him to believe that illicit weapons material 'unquestionably' had been moved out of Iraq." That official was James Clapper, Obama's Director of National Intelligence.
The Bush administration might be faulted for a number of policies concerning Iraq, but the argument that things would be better if Saddam were still around is preposterous.
Saddam nostalgia says that Bush was lying when he said "we're leaving behind a sovereign, stable and self-reliant Iraq." Actually that line comes from an Obama speech, just over four years ago.
A.J. Caschetta is a senior lecturer at the Rochester Institute of Technology and a Shillman-Ginsburg fellow at the Middle East Forum.
Related Topics:  Iraq, US policy, US politics  |  A.J. Caschetta

To subscribe to the MEF mailing lists, go to http://www.meforum.org/list_subscribe.php

The Long War Journal (Site-Wide)

The Long War Journal (Site-Wide)



Posted: 01 Mar 2016 01:05 PM PST
Newly released files recovered in Osama bin Laden's compound reveal that al Qaeda's leadership drafted a truce proposal for the Mauritanian government. There is no evidence in the files that Mauritania agreed to the deal, which would have allowed al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) to operate freely in the country. In a separate letter, AQIM emir Abdelmalek Droukdel asked for bin Laden's advice concerning the staffing of his elite Shura council.
Posted: 01 Mar 2016 10:05 AM PST
Just months prior to his death, Osama bin Laden ordered his right hand man to relocate the al Qaeda "brothers" out of North and South Waziristan. The al Qaeda men were to be moved to Afghanistan and other areas in Pakistan.
Posted: 29 Feb 2016 06:04 PM PST
The raids targeted AQIM field commander Abu al Nour al Andalusi, a Spanish national, and the Saudi spokesman for Al Murabitoon, Abu Dujana al Qasimi. Neither the French nor AQIM have commented on the raids, which are said to have occurred in recent days.

The Mullahs Execute Every Man in an Entire Village

The Mullahs Execute Every Man in an Entire Village

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/261993/mullahs-execute-every-man-entire-village-dr-majid-rafizadeh


While the world's human rights watchdogs continue their romance with the Iranian regime.

7
62
Where is the professional journalism the mainstream media keeps talking about? While they have been focusing on Iran’s artificial democratic elections, the mainstream liberal outlets seem to have intentionally ignored one of the most heinous and egregious acts that the ruling mullahs of Iran committed during the elections.

The Islamist henchmen of the Islamic Republic executed every man in a village in the province Sistan-Baluchestan, according to the latest report coming from Iran. Shahindokht Molaverdi, the vice president for women and family affairs, called for increased protection for the families of the executed as she claimed to a Persian news outlet that “We have a village in Sistan-Baluchestan (province) where every single man has been executed.”

In addition, while liberal journalists often report on the mass executions that are being carried out by the non-state militia -- the Islamic State -- they have chosen to ignore larger scale of human rights violations by a powerful Islamist state, Iran.

Iran has surpassed China in the number of executions being carried out per capita, now ranking at the top. The number of executions of juveniles, women, and political prisoners has significantly increased under the government of the so-called moderate president of Iran, Hassan Rouhani.
So far, under the presidency of the moderate hangman of Iran, Rouhani, more than 2,000 people have been executed by hanging, which is the largest number in the last 25 years.

The Iranian regime usually charges the victims with "muharebeh," “Corruption on earth,” “enmity to Allah,” and being “conspirators with the West.” The prisoners are beaten and forced confessions obtained from them. I was told that that in some cases the regime police forces would place drugs in the victim’s car, house, or clothes after arresting them and then execute them for possessing drugs.
Maya Foa, head of the human rights and death penalty team at Reprieve Organization, pointed out:

“The apparent hanging of every man in one Iranian village demonstrates the astonishing scale of Iran's execution spree. These executions – often based on juvenile arrests, torture, and unfair or non-existent trials – show total contempt for the rule of law, and it is shameful that the UN and its funders are supporting the police forces responsible.”

Several other groups as well are calling on the United Nations to help, but unfortunately the UN continues its romantic relationship with the ruling clerics of Iran and forges ahead with the lifting of sanctions on the Iranian regime.

The more astonishing fact is that many media outlets, scholars, journalists and politicians are naïve enough to think that the current elections in Iran might change this trend of human rights abuses. They should be aware of the simple fact that every candidate who runs for elections in Iran should have “heart-felt and pragmatic allegiance” to the Islamist state of Iran and the radical version of Islam. So, whether the person is a moderate, reformist, or a hardliner, the scale of executions and human rights violations is not going to slow down.

Mr. Shahedd, the U.N. special reporter for human rights in Iran, who is barred from entering Iran by Iranian authorities, wrote in his latest report that “The Islamic Republic of Iran continues … to execute more individuals per capita than any other country in the world. Executions have been rising at an exponential rate … This spate reportedly accelerated at a further staggering rate during the first seven months of 2015.”

Wherever a government is run by an Islamist theocratic rule, human rights violations, abusing women, and mass executions will be at the heart of its socio-political system.


Sweden's Migration Industry

Translations of this item:

  • That Sweden is a "humanitarian superpower" is a myth that needs exposing once and for all. The recent migration wave to Sweden has made some people poor and others very, very rich. It is all about money, and it is about winners and losers.
  • If liberal journalists outside Sweden believe that rape is humanitarian, then Sweden has a humanitarian migration policy.
  • Meanwhile, thousands of "unaccompanied refugee children" are disappearing. and no one knows where they are.
  • There is nothing "noble" in Sweden's migration policy -- far from being a good example of how a migration policy should function, it is a disaster, and its final result is chaos, conflict, and corruption.
When you talk to journalists from the U.S. or the UK, they often seem to think that Sweden is a humanitarian superpower that has received refugees because the Swedish government is following some ideology based on doing good deeds.

That Sweden is a humanitarian superpower, eager to lead by example, is a myth that needs exposing once and for all. The recent migration wave to Sweden has made some people poor and others very, very rich.

Every day one reads news in Sweden about the winners and the losers in the migration industry. One of the winners in Sweden's migration industry is ICA Bank. In November 2015, it invoiced the Swedish Migration Agency $8 million for providing asylum seekers prepaid cards. For every cash withdrawal, ICA Bank takes a $2 fee, and for every prepaid card activated, it takes $21. ICA Bank won the contract without any competition; its contract with the Migration Agency extends to March 2017.

Many asylum accommodations in Sweden are run by private operators and are making huge profits. In 2015, the 30 largest companies that run the asylum accommodations invoiced the Swedish Migration Agency an estimated $109 million. The losers, on the other hand, were the Swedish taxpayers who had to finance these decisions.

In November 2015, it was reported that Sweden's Migration Agency had paid $174 million during an 11-month period to private sector property owners for asylum seekers' accommodation.

Many of the companies running the asylum accommodations have a profit margin of over 50%. Defakon Renting AB has a profit margin of 68%. Nordic Humanitarian AB has a profit margin of 58%. Fastigheterna på Kullen AB has a profit margin of 50%.

The biggest private company running asylum accommodations, Jokarjo AB, is owned by Bert Karlsson, known in Sweden primarily as director of a record label. In the early 1990s, Mr. Karlsson was the leader and founder of a political party, New Democracy, that advocated reducing immigration to Sweden. Between 1991 to 1994, as a representative of his party, he sat in the Swedish parliament. In 2015, his company billed the Swedish Migration Agency $23.9 million. Mr. Karlsson explained his business plan for running a home for asylum seekers in a simple sentence: "My idea is to make it cheaper and better than anyone else."

One method he used to make his business more profitable is that asylum seekers have to buy their own toilet paper, apparently despite having agreed with the Migration Agency to provide asylum seekers with toilet paper, sanitary napkins and diapers. In December 2015, the Swedish media revealed that asylum seekers have to buy all these products themselves.

One can only imagine the situation for asylum accommodations run by minor private operators.
This is what the Swedish "humanitarian superpower" is actually about. It is all about money, and it is about winners and losers.

The companies running the asylum accommodations are becoming rich at the Swedish taxpayers' expense; at the same time, asylum accommodations are not managed properly.

Here are a few of the violent incidents that happen every day:

On January 25, 2016, the police arrived at an asylum accommodation in Annerstad, southern Sweden, after hearing of a brawl there between Syrians and Afghans. When the police arrived, according to their report, no one -- not even the people working there -- could speak Swedish.

In January 2016, there were reports that a ten-year old boy at an asylum accommodation in Västerås had been raped repeatedly. In February 2016, there were reports that a boy at an asylum accommodation in Maglarp, in southern Sweden, had been raped by two other boys at the same asylum accommodation.

If liberal journalists outside Sweden believe that rape is humanitarian, then Sweden has a humanitarian migration policy.

What is actually happening in Sweden, however, is that private companies are making millions of dollars at taxpayer expense, while the newly arrived migrants are living a horrible existence in which rape and other abuses are a part of daily life. This is what other European countries will experience if they follow Sweden's liberal migration policy.

Children who come to Sweden without parents ("unaccompanied refugee children") must, according to the Swedish law, be assigned a legal guardian. The guardian, instead of the parents, is responsible for the child's personal relationships and managing daily affairs. In December 2015, it was reported that there are guardians responsible for up to 29 unaccompanied refugee children, and who earn more than $7,000 a month. It is not, of course, possible for one guardian to take care of 29 unaccompanied refugee children. The migration industry in Sweden has created opportunities for people with no conscience to become wealthy. Meanwhile, thousands of unaccompanied refugee children are disappearing and no one knows where they are.

Another part of the migration industry that has grown of late are foster homes for unaccompanied refugee children. In February, reports surfaced that one of the heads of the Swedish Migration Agency also runs the private company, Starkfamn Familjehem AB: a business that provides foster homes to unaccompanied refugee children. It is not only people in the private sector are making money from the migration industry, but also people working inside the state apparatus who want to do well.

The biggest private company running asylum accommodations is owned by Bert Karlsson (left). In 2015, his company billed Swedish taxpayers $23.9 million. His homes require asylum seekers to buy their own toilet paper, apparently despite having agreed with the Migration Agency to provide asylum seekers with toilet paper, sanitary napkins and diapers. Wafa Issa (right) is head of the Migration Agency for the Stockholm region. She also runs a private company that is paid to provide foster homes to unaccompanied refugee children.

One of the losers is the Swedish police. They have reported that they can no longer cope with their jobs because they cannot handle the hundreds of young men in Sweden right now from Morocco and other countries in North Africa.

When you talk with journalists from Britain or the United States who think that Sweden's migration policy is a role model, you have to think of those journalists who once saw the Soviet Union as a model. Communism did not work; Sweden's migration policy does not work. That Sweden is a "humanitarian superpower" is truthfully nothing but marketing: the Green Party and some Social Democrats want to export Sweden's liberal migration policy to the rest of Europe.

Although a small clique in Sweden have become millionaires because of the migration industry, the schools, police, social services and taxpayers in Sweden have lost a lot and have a difficult and uncertain future. There will be major conflicts in Sweden. There is nothing "noble" in Sweden's migration policy. The Swedish migration model, far from being a good example of how a migration policy should function, is an embarrassment and a disaster, and its final result is chaos, conflict, and corruption.
Nima Gholam Ali Pour is a member of the board of education in the Swedish city of Malmö and is engaged in several Swedish think tanks concerned with the Middle East. He is also editor for the social conservative website Situation Malmö.

Belgian police find evidence that the Islamic State is looking to build dirty bomb

Belgian police find evidence that the Islamic State is looking to build dirty bomb


“Thankfully, the Obama administration said at the time that they had no evidence the material was obtained by ISIS for use in a dirty bomb and they were monitoring the situation.” Oh, that’s reassuring.

Islamic-State12
“Belgian police find evidence that ISIS is looking to build dirty bomb,” by L. Todd Wood, Washington Times, February 29, 2016:
Belgian police, while searching the home of an Islamic State or ISIS suspect after the Paris bombings last year, found surveillance films taken of a senior researcher at a Belgian nuclear center, which produces a significant portion of the world’s radioisotopes, and his family. Police suspect ISIS terrorists wanted to capture the man or his family members and hold them for ransom in exchange for nuclear materials.
“We can imagine that the terrorists might want to kidnap someone or kidnap his family,” so they can force their target to turn over the radioactive innards of such a device after removing the materials surreptitiously, said Nele Scheerlinck, a spokeswoman for Belgium’s Federal Agency for Nuclear Control, the nation’s nuclear regulator, NBC News reported.
“We know that it would not require a team of nuclear physicists or even a particularly sophisticated criminal network to turn raw material into a deadly weapon,” an internal Energy Department report on the threat, designated “Official Use Only,” declared in May 2013. “In many cases, a determined lone wolf or a disgruntled insider is all it might take.”
This incident is the first public, confirmed evidence that ISIS is attempting to acquire radioactive material to build a dirty bomb and threaten Western cities. The prospect of obtaining material in this manner is especially troubling as there are hundreds of thousands of nuclear building blocks for a bomb located around the world in medical and industrial sites. Just recently, radioactive industrial material was reported stolen in Iraq.
Thankfully, the Obama administration said at the time that they had no evidence the material was obtained by ISIS for use in a dirty bomb and they were monitoring the situation….

Hidden Camera Catches Imam Teaching That Divorced Women Who ‘Fornicate’ Should be Stoned To Death

Hidden Camera Catches Imam Teaching That Divorced Women Who ‘Fornicate’ Should be Stoned To Death


6

A prominent Danish mosque has told their congregation that apostates, adulterers and any one who harms a Muslim should be killed. The Mosque chairman defended the sermons, saying, “we believe in Islam”.

The Grimhøj Mosque in Aarhus made headlines last month, when one of their imams defend child rape among recent migrants because it is part of their culture. .

The mosque also appeared to declare support for the Islamic State (IS) terror group in 2014, and again in 2015. However, local police later praised the mosque, claiming they were in fact discouraging young Muslims from joining the Jihad.

Now, a new documentary by Danish broadcaster TV2 has reignited debate over whether the infamous mosque should be shut down. Radical preacher Abu Bilal Ismail (pictured above) was secretly filmed saying:

“If a married or divorced women engages in fornication, and she is not a virgin, she should be stoned to death”.

Continuing: “If someone violates their marriage, either man or woman, they commit adultery and their blood is thus halal [acceptable under Muslim law, ed.] and they should be killed by stoning. If the woman is a virgin, the punishment is whipping”.

In the clip, the imam advocates an “eye for an eye” policy. “If someone kills a Muslim, then they should be killed,” he says, before adding that anyone who leaves Islam (Apostasy) should also be murdered.

“It is completely unheard of that there are people in Denmark preaching this sort of thing. It clearly does not belong here. He [Abu Bilal Ismail, ed.] doesn’t belong in Denmark either,” Integration Minister Inger Støjberg told the Ritzau news agency.

Marcus Knuth, from the ruling Venstre party, said that it is hard to believe that the same mosque can be the centre of repeated controversies.

“What is so shocking is that there are so many cases involving this mosque and that they just keep coming. That is almost the worst thing – that they haven’t learned anything and still practise these types of things and encourage this Stone Age behaviour,” he told TV2.

The mosques’s chairman, Oussama El-Saadi, who personal declared his support for IS last year, defended the comments and said the TV2 journalist was a “spy” who had tricked the Imam responsible.

“Our imam needs to answer what he has read on Sharia, when TV2’s spy asks him about Sharia. We can’t cheat and say incorrect things about our religion”, Mr. El-Saadi said.

Adding: “We believe in Islam as it is, but as our imam says we live in Denmark, where there is freedom, and we followed Danish rules and Danish laws. So stoning and whipping aren’t valid in Denmark”.

Breitbart London reported on Mr. El-Saadi last month when he spoke out in favour of child brides in Denmark. Speaking to a Danish newspaper, the Imam said: “One should look at these cases from a different perspective.

“It is an extraordinary humanitarian situation, and I think you have to take care of these families. They’re married, and even if the man is twice as old as they have built a family. We have to accept that it is a different culture, and we can not destroy family life”.

East Jutland Police said on Twitter that they would “investigate the remarks further and determine if it is a punishable situation”.

60 Minutes crew attacked and injured by a group of masked men while filming a story with Liz Hayes on European refugee crisis

60 Minutes crew attacked and injured by a group of masked men while filming a story with Liz Hayes on European refugee crisis

  • 60 Minutes Australia crew bashed by gang of masked men in Sweden
  • Cameraman and producer were injured in two separate attacks
  • They were punched in the face, run over and had a jar thrown at them 
  • Reporter Liz Hayes is covering European migrant crisis - she was unhurt
  • Channel Nine says 60 Minutes staff have returned to hotel and are safe 
  • The assaults were filmed and will form part of the upcoming story 



A Channel Nine 60 Minutes crew working with reporter Liz Hayes has been attacked and injured while on assignment in Stockholm.

Sweden's Avpixlat news service reports that the 60 Minutes team was interviewing residents about the European migrant crisis in the suburb of Rinkeby when they were set upon twice by 'a group of young African masked men'.

'When a cameraman got out of the car, a car drove up next to him and the African driver of the vehicle began to fight,' the agency reported.
Reporter Liz Hayes (middle) was filming with the 60 Minutes Australia crew of a cameraman and producer when they were attacked by 'a group of young African masked men', according to Swedish news services
Reporter Liz Hayes (middle) was filming with the 60 Minutes Australia crew of a cameraman and producer when they were attacked by 'a group of young African masked men', according to Swedish news services
Liz Hayes and a 60 Minutes crew are on assignment in Sweden where they are reporting a story about the migrant crisis - they were confronted by a group who objected to them filming. 'There was a series of scuffles and the police were called. The 60 Minutes cameraman and producer were slightly injured,' Nine says
Liz Hayes and a 60 Minutes crew are on assignment in Sweden where they are reporting a story about the migrant crisis - they were confronted by a group who objected to them filming. 'There was a series of scuffles and the police were called. The 60 Minutes cameraman and producer were slightly injured,' Nine says
A Nine spokesperson has confirmed that reporter Liz Hayes was not hurt in the attack
A Nine spokesperson has confirmed that reporter Liz Hayes was not hurt in the attack

'After two minutes fuss about why they would shoot right in Rinkeby as the driver drove over the cameraman's foot. The man fell and lay still for a moment while the team continued to film the car quickly drove away.'

Police were called and took statements but once they left another group lay siege on the Australian crew.

'A photographer was attacked and received a blow on the mouth with a closed fist so that the bloodshed occurred,' wrote Jan Sjunnesson.

'A jar was then discarded into the camera. At the same time attacked another photographer who also was beaten right across the chin so that a tooth loose.'
The team then decided to leave Rinkeby.

The attacks were confirmed by the Nine Network to Daily Mail Australia.
'Liz Hayes and a 60 Minutes crew are currently on assignment in Europe where they are reporting a story about the migrant crisis,' a Nine Spokesperson said.
'In a suburb of Stockholm yesterday they were confronted by a group who objected to them filming.

'There was a series of scuffles and the police were called. The 60 Minutes cameraman and producer were slightly injured but filming continued with police at the scene.

'The crew have now returned to their hotel and are all fine.
'Filming on the story continues tomorrow.
'It is expected the story will be broadcast on 60 Minutes in the next few weeks.'
They say Liz Hayes was not injured in the attack. 
The Nine Network has confirmed the attack on the 60 Minutes crew in a Stockholm suburb by 'a group who objected to them filming'. A cameraman and producer were injured in the assaults
The Nine Network has confirmed the attack on the 60 Minutes crew in a Stockholm suburb by 'a group who objected to them filming'. A cameraman and producer were injured in the assaults

'60 Minutes' TV crew attacked and beaten in Sweden

'60 Minutes' TV crew attacked and beaten in Sweden

 http://speisa.com/modules/articles/index.php/item.2561/60-minutes-tv-crew-attacked-and-beaten-in-sweden.html
'60 Minutes' TV crew attacked and beaten in Sweden

This afternoon a TV crew from the Australian 60 Minutes TV program, had found the way to the immigrant-dense suburb of Rinkeby in Stockholm.

After the visit the journalists said that they have been to Somalia, Syria and Iraq, but they have never experienced conditions similar to those in Sweden.

The TV crew got an insight into the Swedish multicultural society that they are never going to forget.

The TV crew was in the Stockholm suburb of Rinkeby to depict the mass immigration to Sweden, and do interviews with local residents. The team barely got into Rinkeby before it was attacked for the first time, writes Avpixlat.

When a cameraman from 60 Minutes went out of the car, suddenly a car came up close beside him. The African driver of the car began to argue about why they were filming in Rinkeby. After a few minutes he ran across the foot of the cameraman, who tumbled to the ground and lay in agony. Another cameraman filmed the whole incident.

The camera man was not seriously injured, however, and was able to continue the job, but with significant pain. The police arrived at the site 10 minutes later and six policemen guarded the TV team, which consisted of three camera men and broadcaster Liz Hayes, in addition to Jan Sjunnesson from Avpixlat, who guided them in Rinkeby.

After a while the Australians wanted to go to Rinkeby Square, but the police had to stay behind on the outside not to provoke the residents.

- We provoke them if we continue, but we'll see you from Rinkeby Plan, said one of the policemen to the TV team.

Inside the Rinkeby Square, the TV crew talked with residents who did not seem aggressive, but who told about how good life was in Rinkeby with so many different cultures. All said they enjoyed it there. But when the police suddenly disappeared, without telling the TV crew, a group of masked men suddenly circled the camera men.

One of the camera men was attacked and hit with a clenched fist over his mouth. A bottle was then thrown at the camera.

Meanwhile, another camera man was attacked and punched in the mouth so that a tooth came loose.

The TV team quickly decided to leave Rinkeby, with pictures and film of everything that had happened. They told the journalist from Avpixlat that they have been to Somalia, Syria and Iraq, but they have never experienced anything like this anywhere.

The 60 Minutes report from Sweden will be broadcasted on national Australian TV shortly.

In addition to interviews with Tino Sanandaji and Avpixlat's Jan Sjunnesson on the immigration policy, also Islamists on the Internet in Sweden are portrayed in the program.