Thursday, January 29, 2009

Lord Ahmed threatens Parliament into submission













homelearnactlocal chaptersContact Congress









Lord Ahmed Threatens
Parliament Into Submission


Dear Solsticewitch13 ,


A Member of Congress announces she is inviting Dutch
Parliamentarian Geert W
ilders to come to Washington to
meet with members of Congress and discuss his documentary
film “Fitna.”

When Congressman Abdullah hears about this, he
threatens the Member and the entire Congress that, unless Mr. Wilders’
visit is cancelled, he will mobilize 10,000 Muslims to prevent the visit
from taking place.

As a result, the visit is cancelled and Congressman Abdullah praises

Allah for delivering a victory to the Muslim community.

Of course, this couldn’t possibly happen in the United
States, right? Read the commentary below, roll the clock back thirty
years, and ask yourself how many Brits do you think would have believed it
could happen in Great Britain today?

What was unthinkable in Great Britain thirty years ago is reality today.

This is “cultural jihad” at work.

Twenty years ago who would have believed that today Harvard
would create “women only” gym hours to meet the demands of Muslims. Or a
state legislature would allow an imam to open its session with a prayer
that calls on “victory over those who disbelieve.”

Or the Fairfax County (Virginia) police department dropping an anti-terrorism

training program after complaints from Muslim police officers – one of whom was
engaging in the various types of subversion the training program was
intended to prevent.

For the British Parliament to abandon its right to free speech by knuckling

under to the intimidation tactics by Lord Ahmed will only invite more –
and bolder – tactics. To think that we in America can follow the path
Great Britain has trod and not end up dealing with the same intimidation
tactics is the worst form of wishful thinking.









Lord Ahmed threatens Parliament into submission


http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2009/01/lord-ahmed-threatens-parliament-into.html


Lord Ahmed is a repugnant individual. Not only in appearance, but in
association, character and morality. And to hear that he has threatened
jihad on the House of Lords if their lordships should fail to meet his
demands only serves to intensify Cranmer’s loathing of the man.


It appears that a member of the House of Lords had invited the Dutch
politician,
GeertWilders, to a private meeting in the Palace of

Westminster. She had intended to invite her colleagues in the Lords
to a private viewing of his ‘documentary’ Fitna, followed by
discussion and debate in true parliamentary fashion. This is,
after all, a liberal democracy, and their lordships enjoy the rights of
freedom of expression and freedom of association, not to

mention certain parliamentary privileges for the protection of
their function in the legislature.

But no sooner had the unsuspecting baroness sent out
her invitations, Lord Ahmed raised hell. It is
reported that he
‘threatened to mobilise 10,000 Muslims to prevent Mr

Wilders from entering the House and threatened to take the colleague who was organising the
event to court’.

And so Fitna has been cancelled: it shall not now be screened in the House of Lords

on 29th January.

The
Pakistani Press is jubliant, and Lord Ahmed is praising Allah for delivering


a victory for the Muslim community’.

It is a sorry state of affairs indeed that a parliament whose liberties have been forged

through centuries of religious intolerance should succumb to the threats of one
intolerant Muslim. Lord Ahmed is manifesting a notion of Divine Right, and
one suspects it is precisely the sort of defence of Islam that Prince
Charles shall make when he is sworn


'Defender of Faith’. The blasphemy laws are being re-forged to protect one god, one
faith and one prophet; they no longer defend YHWH, Christianity, Jesus Christ or the
Church of England. Lord Ahmed is not functioning as a Labour peer; he is the

self-appointed khalifa of all things Islamic. He is not concerned to protect freedom
of expression or freedom of speech, but to stifle debate and ensure that Parliament
submits to the Dar Al-Islam.

It is for moments such as these that one might hope the Lords Spiritual might enter
the fray and defend the right of the noble baroness to extend an
invitation to a democratically-elected Dutch MP. Their silence is
deafening. They no longer believe anything strongly for fear of causing
offence; they no longer defend anything for fear of being abolished.


If Lord Ahmed had threatened Cranmer with ‘10,000 Muslims to
prevent Mr Wilders from entering the House’, His Grace would have assured
his Lordship of 100,000 people of all faiths and none to prevent the
Muslims from preventing Mr Wilders from entering the House.


There are occasions when turning the other cheek is sheer folly.






-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ACT for
America

P.O. Box 6884
Virginia Beach, VA 23456
http://www.actforamerica.org/


ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated
to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots
citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to
informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies
that promote America’s national security and the defense of American
democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong
as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential
to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more
secure.






HOW CAN I TELL OTHERS ABOUT YOUR ORGANIZATION?
Send a personalized version of this message to your friends.




HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR ORGANIZATION?
Click here to give an online donation.

No comments:

Post a Comment