Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Who is the real enemy?








homelearnactlocal chaptersContact Congress









Who Do They See As
America’s Real Enemy?


Dear Solstice ,


Decisions made and actions taken by the Obama administration and
some leaders of Congress the past few months leave many Americans,
including us, wondering “Who do they see as America’s real enemy?”


For instance, regardless of one’s position on health care reform,
we’re witnessing harsher epithets tossed by some politicians at protestors
exercising their first amendment rights at congressional townhall meetings
than we hear applied to radical Islamists. When certain politicians call
their fellow Americans “evil,” “Nazis,” “fascists,” and “un-American,”
while at the same time refusing to utter the phrase “war on Islamic
terrorism,” we are left to wonder: “Who do they see as America’s real
enemy?”

When the Obama administration releases details of our
interrogation techniques, compromising our counterterrorism efforts, and
directs the FBI to mirandize captured enemy combatants on the battlefield
in Afghanistan by reading them their “rights,” we are left to wonder: “Who
do they see as America’s real enemy?”

And when Attorney General
Eric Holder, surely with the tacit approval of President Obama, decides to
order an investigation of interrogation techniques of terrorists, which is
devastating morale at the CIA and will ultimately put Americans at greater
risk, we are left to wonder: “Who do they see as America’s real enemy?”


_________________________________________________________________________________________




CIA Torture
Probe Endangers the War on Terror

Donald
Lambro
Wednesday, September 02, 2009


http://townhall.com/columnists/DonaldLambro/2009/09/02/cia_torture_probe_endangers_the_war_on_terror


The Justice Department's decision to investigate the interrogation
methods used by the Bush administration's war on terrorism sent a chilling
message to CIA agents that they could be prosecuted for protecting our
country from another attack.

Despite President Obama's promise to
CIA personnel earlier this year that he did not want to reopen the debate
over aggressive-interrogation practices in the previous administration,
Attorney General Eric Holder named a special prosecutor to go after agents
who acted with the approval of the Bush Justice Department's legal
rulings.

Holder not only overruled Obama -- who caved in to his
attorney general and said it was his call -- he dismissed the bitter
opposition of CIA Director Leon Panetta and even attorneys in his own
department.

It was the latest move in a number of actions that
have defanged the CIA and reduced its effectiveness in the war on terror,
after eight years of foiling numerous plots that has kept our country
safe.

Seven months into his presidency, Obama has moved to close
down the Guantanamo Bay facility for prisoners in the war against
terrorism. He has issued directives that have tied the hands of
intelligence agents trying to discover terrorist plots against Americans
before they occur. He has removed the CIA's authority for interrogation
and placed it in the White House. He has undercut CIA chief Panetta,
raising questions as to who is running the agency, Panetta or the White
House's political agents.

His administration has even banned
Bush's phrase, "war on terrorism," and in the past few months needlessly
released top-secret intelligence documents that have given Al Qaeda and
the Taliban terrorists a treasure-trove of information about interrogation
policies and practices.

And now he has given in to Holder's plan
to prosecute some of the CIA's best agents, breaking a solemn public
pledge to the nation's chief intelligence agency that its agents would not
be persecuted simply for doing their job.

"President Obama's
decision to allow the Justice Department to investigate and possibly
prosecute CIA personnel, and his decision to remove authority for
interrogation from the CIA to the White House, serves as a reminder, if
any were needed, of why so many Americans have doubts about this
administration's ability to be responsible for our nation's security,"
said former Vice President Richard Cheney.

People who have talked
to Panetta recently say his embattled agency is suffering from deep morale
problems as agents wonder why the White House seems to be spending more
time and effort investigating them than stepping up the war on terrorism.


Career CIA agents now have good reason to fear that Holder's --
and now the president's -- special prosecutor, John H. Durham, will be
coming after them with both guns blazing and maybe other former top
officials in the Bush administration.

"Once Durham starts
digging," the Washington Post reported this week, "... the veteran
prosecutor could uncover evidence that leads him higher up the chain of
command in an inquiry that grows broader than what the Justice Department
outlined Monday."

The dangerous precedent this sets is contrary to
Obama's oft-repeated intention to focus on the future, not the past.
Instead, his administration is now intent on prosecuting public officials
who acted at the time under legal opinions cleared by the Justice
Department.

Administration officials say the president is
sensitive to the damaging impact that a criminal investigation could have
on the CIA and has drawn a tenuous line that they describe as a "balancing
act."

But through information gathered from high-value terrorist
prisoners during CIA interrogations, we know that our enemies are plotting
to attack again and kill as many Americans as they can. This isn't a time
for a nuanced "balancing act." It is a time to send a message to those who
would do us harm that we are using all of the tools, methods and weapons
at our command to protect our national security.

That was the
clear, unmistakable message President Bush sent to our enemies, and no one
can quarrel with the fact that the policies, programs and actions he
implemented successfully defended us for eight years.

But that is
not the message the Obama administration is sending as batteries of
lawyers are being sent in to defend terrorist detainees, some of whom who
are either being read their Miranda rights or sent back to their homelands
where many have resumed their terrorist lives.

Indeed, instead of
stepping up the war on terrorism, his administration seems to be declaring
war on America's intelligence apparatus with plans to mount a criminal
investigation against a frontline national-security agency.

"It
doesn't appear to be a serious move" to combat terrorism, Cheney said
Sunday on Fox News. "It's a direct slap at the CIA."

It is also
another egregious example of this administration's misguided retreat in a
war where failure is not an option.










-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ACT for
America

P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591
www.actforamerica.org


ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated
to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots
citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to
informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies
that promote America’s national security and the defense of American
democratic values against the assault of radical Islam.
We are only as strong
as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential
to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more
secure.






HOW CAN I TELL OTHERS ABOUT YOUR ORGANIZATION?
Send a personalized version of this message to your friends.




HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR ORGANIZATION?
Click here to give an online donation.

No comments:

Post a Comment