Read 'em and weep

Visit our News page “Read ‘em and weep” Perhaps you’ve seen the old western movie where the poker player lays down his winning hand and says, “read ‘em and weep.” That’s about all we can say about the various media and other reactions (below) to the attempted Times Square bombing—“read ‘em and weep.” Rewind to the Ft. Hood jihadist attack and we saw the same preposterous responses we’re seeing now. A Denver Post columnist has referred to this phenomenon as “the enemy we can’t name.” Notwithstanding this latest chapter in political correctness, we can thank the veteran who spotted the suspicious car and alerted local authorities, who acted quickly. This incident is, in fact, the very kind of scenario we had in mind when we created the joint project with Veteran Defenders of America. Veterans have received training the average citizen doesn’t get. Who better for us to call on to be an organized “eyes and ears of freedom?” Are you a veteran? Do you have a family member who is a veteran? Then please click here to learn more about Veteran Defenders of America! Why Would Anyone Want to Blow Up Times Square? by Daniel Pipes National Review Online May 5, 2010 http://www.danielpipes.org/8336/why-blow-up-times-square When news comes of Muslims engaging in violence, the triad of politicians, law enforcement, and media invariably presumes that the perpetrator suffers from some mental or emotional incapacity. (For a quick listing of examples, see my collection at "Sudden Jihad or 'Inordinate Stress' at Ft. Hood?"). Instead, I argue, they should begin with a presumption of jihadi intent. That is, the default expectation should be ideological passion, not insanity. Spreading Islam and applying Islamic law are the goals. Of course, some crazy Muslims exist and they do engage in violence, but they constitute a microscopic percentage of the 15,247 Muslim terrorist incidents since 9/11, as counted by www.thereligionofpeace.com. The failed effort to blow up an SUV in New York's Times Square prompted speculation about the would-be bomber's motives even before the identity of Faisal Shahzad, an immigrant from Pakistan, had been made public. The Nation's Robert Dreyfuss discounted the possibility of a jihadi from the Pakistan-based Taliban, "it seems far more likely to me [he] was either a lone nut job or a member of some squirrely branch of the Tea Party, anti-government far right." Then, just hours after Shahzad had been arrested, authorities rushed to assure the public his action had nothing to do with Islam. Examples from May 4: The establishment agrees - Islam played no role in Faisal Shahzad's attempted terrorism. Mike Bloomberg, mayor of New York City: the bomb could have been placed by "somebody with a political agenda who doesn't like the health care bill or something. It could be anything." Mahkdoom Qureshi, Pakistan's foreign minister: "This is a blow back [for U.S. military activities in Pakistan]. This is a reaction. This is retaliation. And you could expect that. Let's not be naive. They're not going to sort of sit and welcome you eliminate them. They're going to fight back." Nadeem Haider Kiani, spokesman for the Pakistani embassy in Washington: it's too soon to tell exactly what motivated the bomber but early indications suggest he is "a disturbed individual." Cable News Network: "It can confirmed that his house has been foreclosed in recent years. I mean, one would have to imagine that brought a lot of pressure and a lot of heartache on that family." CBS News: "It isn't clear if more suspects are at large OR what the motive could be." The Washington Post: Under the title, "The economic crisis meets terrorism," Ezra Klein notes that Shahzad's house was foreclosed and comments: "This guy is like string theory for the media: He brings together the seemingly incompatible stories that drove the past decade. That said, you of course don't want to speculate on why someone 'really' did something. The hearts of men are opaque, and motives are complex." And here's a collection from today's papers Law enforcement (as reported by NY1): "Investigators say they still have no motive for Shahzad's actions." (May 5, 2010) Kifyat Ali, a relative of Shahzad's: "We are shocked. He had no connection with any political party or jihadi group." (May 5, 2010) Associated Press headline: "NY car bomb suspect cooperates, but motive mystery." (May 5, 2010) Associated Press story: "Federal officials aren't talking about a motive in the arrest of a naturalized U.S. citizen charged with attempting to set off a bomb in New York's Times Square." (May 5, 2010) New York Post "exclusive": Shahzad "said he was driven to evil by the slew of deaths among leaders of the terror group, law-enforcement sources revealed yesterday. Sources said he was an eyewitness to the onslaught throughout the eight months he spent in Pakistan beginning last summer." (May 5, 2010) USA Today headline: "Motive of NYC car bomb suspect remains a mystery." (May 5, 2010) The Guardian headline: "Times Square bomb: Pakistanis puzzled by bomber's motives." (May 5, 2010) Comments: (1) Some of these interpretations say the motives are mysterious, some of them speculate about one thing or another – but all assiduously avoid the elephant in the room. (2) You can't win a war if you don't have the courage to name the enemy. (3) Naming the enemy means changing some of the more pleasant aspects of Western life, and so is tough to do. (4) I expect that naming the enemy will occur only after a cataclysm ends our patience with minced words. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Make sure you receive all of your messages from ACT for America. Add actforamerica@donationnet.net to your address book as an approved email sender. If you found this message in your "Bulk" or "Spam" folder, please click the "Not Spam" button to notify your provider that these are emails you want to receive. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACT for America P.O. Box 12765 Pensacola, FL 32591 www.actforamerica.org ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure. The news items, blogs, educational materials and other information in our emails and on our website are only intended to provide information, news and commentary on events and issues related to the threat of radical Islam. Much of this information is based upon media sources, such as the AP wire services, newspapers, magazines, books, online news blog and news services, and radio and television, which we deem to be reliable. However, we have undertaken no independent investigation to verify the accuracy of the information reported by these media sources. We therefore disclaim all liability for false or inaccurate information from these media sources. We also disclaim all liability for the third-party information that may be accessed through the material referenced in our emails or posted on our website. HOW CAN I TELL OTHERS ABOUT YOUR ORGANIZATION? Send a personalized version of this message to your friends. HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR ORGANIZATION? Click here to give an online donation.