Top Stories
JPost:
"Banking officials and residents in Beirut are concerned about a US
pressure group's report that Hezbollah and Iran are using Lebanon's banks
in a large money-laundering scheme, a leading Lebanese daily reported on
Thursday. New York-based United Against a Nuclear Iran (UANI) made public
last month the results of a three-month, confidential investigation into
the influence of Iran and Hezbollah on Lebanon's banking system and
sovereign bond market. The group says Lebanon's financial system -
including Banque du Liban, the country's central bank - is being used to
funnel massive amounts of illicit cash for Hezbollah and its state
sponsor, Iran... Lebanese concerns about the report come after several groups
- Austria's Erste Sparinvest, Eaton Vance Investment Managers, Nord Est
Asset Management, Ameriprise and Aktia Fund Management - divested from
Lebanese sovereign debt securities...In response, UANI spokesman Nathan
Carleton said that Lebanese banking officials should be concerned about
the campaign, noting that several bondholders had divested from Lebanese
sovereign debt. 'Lebanon's Central Bank Governor Riad Salame has said
absolutely nothing in response to UANI, and his silence has been
deafening,' Carleton added. 'He has notably been unable to answer even
basic questions about Iran's role in Lebanon's banking system, including
whether he agrees with Hezbollah's leadership that its funding comes
entirely from Iran.'" http://t.uani.com/OPq35F
Reuters:
"Asia's major crude buyers are finding ways around tough U.S. and EU
sanctions to maintain imports from Iran, suggesting that, for now, the
worst may be over for the OPEC producer that is losing more than $100
million a day in oil export revenues. China, India, Japan and South Korea
buy most of the one million barrels per day of crude Iran is able to
export despite financial, shipping and insurance sanctions aimed at
curbing funds for its controversial nuclear program. After a lull in
imports in the middle of the year caused by Asian refineries reducing
purchases as sanctions kicked in, analysts expect shipments to rise in
August and September. But on average, imports are likely to remain steady
until the end of the year, unless the United States and the European
Union come up with fresh sanctions to curb Iran's earnings. 'The drop in
Iranian oil exports has leveled out over the past couple months at
roughly 1 million barrels per day below 2011 levels,' said Trevor Houser,
a partner at the New York-based Rhodium Group and a former State
Department adviser... At current prices, Iran is losing some $110 million
a day in export earnings compared with the start of the year." http://t.uani.com/Qlekef
Bloomberg:
"Iraq's crude output rose above 3 million barrels a day last month
for the first time since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion that toppled Saddam
Hussein, according to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries.
Iraq pumped 3.08 million barrels a day in July, 115,000 barrels more than
the previous month, OPEC's Vienna-based secretariat said today in its
Monthly Oil Market Report. The Persian Gulf state for a second month
outpaced Iran, where output dropped by 173,000 barrels to 2.82 million.
Iraq last produced more than 3 million barrels in February 2002, OPEC
said after revising its April estimate... Iraq's output last exceeded
Iran's in 1988, when the countries ended their eight-year war, statistics
compiled by BP show." http://t.uani.com/MYs0fy
Nuclear
Program
Reuters: "The
United States still believes that Iran is not on the verge of having a
nuclear weapon and that Tehran has not made a decision to pursue one,
U.S. officials said on Thursday. Their comments came after Israeli media
reports claimed U.S. President Barack Obama had received a new National
Intelligence Estimate saying Iran had made significant and surprising
progress toward military nuclear capability. Later, Israeli Defense
Minister Ehud Barak suggested that the new U.S. report, which he
acknowledged might be something other than a National Intelligence
Estimate, 'transforms the Iranian situation into an even more urgent
one.' But a White House National Security Council spokesman disputed the
Israeli reports, saying the U.S. intelligence assessment of Iran's
nuclear activities had not changed since intelligence officials delivered
testimony to Congress on the issue earlier this year." http://t.uani.com/P4O4aX
Bloomberg:
"An Iranian semiofficial news agency is quoting the country's acting
navy commander as saying that Tehran has no immediate plans to build
nuclear naval reactors. The Thursday report by ISNA says rear Adm.
Gohlamreza Khadem Bigham told the country's Arabic language Al-Alam TV
late Wednesday that while Iran possesses technology and capabilities to
produce highly-enriched nuclear fuel for naval reactors, plans to produce
either have not been on the 'agenda' of the country or its navy." http://t.uani.com/MmyojY
Guardian:
"A new cyber surveillance virus has been found in the Middle East
that can spy on banking transactions and steal login and passwords,
according Kaspersky Lab, a leading computer security firm. Dubbed Gauss,
the virus may also be capable of attacking critical infrastructure and
was very likely built in the same laboratories as Stuxnet, the computer
worm widely believed to have been used by the US and Israel to attack
Iran's nuclear programme, Kaspersky Lab said on Thursday. The
Moscow-based firm said it found Gauss had infected more than 2,500
personal computers, the bulk of them in Lebanon, Israel and the
Palestinian territories. Targets included Lebanon's BlomBank, ByblosBank
and Credit Libanais, as well as Citibank and eBay's PayPal online payment
system." http://t.uani.com/Ne54xr
Times of Israel:
"Hezbollah MP Walid Sakariya told Lebanese television this week that
the nuclear weapon Iran is allegedly developing is intended to annihilate
Israel. In a segment recorded and translated by MEMRI (the Middle East
Media Research Institute), Sakariya, also a retired general, told his interviewer
on Hezbollah's al-Manar TV Tuesday that should Iran acquire a nuclear
weapon it would serve Syrian as well as Iranian interests, namely the
eradication of the Jewish state. 'This nuclear weapon is intended to
create a balance of terror with Israel, to finish off the Zionist
enterprise, and to end all Israeli aggression against the Arab nation,'
Sakariya said." http://t.uani.com/OPwEwN
Sanctions
Reuters:
"Indian state-run refiner Hindustan Petroleum Corp plans to lift up
to three Suezmax crude cargoes or about 99,300 barrels per day (bpd) oil
from Iran this month, its executive director B. K. Namdeo said on
Thursday. India, which has secured a waiver from U.S. sanctions against
Iran's disputed nuclear programme after cutting purchases, aims to lift
at least 15 percent less of its oil in the current fiscal year ending
March 31, 2013." http://t.uani.com/OPscy0
Bloomberg:
"New York's financial-services regulator has grounds to shut
Standard Chartered Plc in the state even if he accepts the firm's argument
that it illegally laundered only a fraction of the $250 billion he
claims. As the state's top banking regulator, Benjamin Lawsky has power
to act in his discretion against any financial institution he deems
untrustworthy, according to the charter of his year-old department.
Penalties he could impose include fines and the revocation of the bank's
license to operate in the state. Lawsky is said to be considering a
settlement figure as high as $700 million, according to person familiar
with the case. That would match the amount HSBC Holdings Plc set aside
last month to resolve allegations of similar behavior." http://t.uani.com/Nnx0v0
Reuters:
"A New York state case against Standard Chartered Plc is more about
whether the British bank carried out an old-fashioned cover-up using
allegedly false records and less about the role the bank played in the
alleged money-laundering of funds tied to Iran, according to people
familiar with the situation and court documents. The New York Department
of Financial Services on Monday ordered the bank to send representatives
to a meeting next Wednesday to explain why its alleged breaches of
records laws should not mean the loss of its state banking license. A
source close to the case said on Thursday it was possible the meeting
will be postponed to allow time for discussions about the case between
regulators - both state and federal - and the bank." http://t.uani.com/S7cjUn
Syrian Civil
War
AFP:
"The United States on Thursday accused Iran of playing a
"nefarious" role in the Syria conflict, one that strengthens
the case for President Bashar al-Assad to be forced out of office. Susan
Rice, US ambassador to the United Nations said the alliance of Iran,
Lebanese Hezbollah and Assad's government -- a group that boasts of being
the Middle East's "an axis of resistance" -- was 'bad for the
region.' Rice was speaking to NBC television shortly after Assad met a
top Iranian envoy in his war-torn capital this week and as Tehran hosted
a conference on the conflict designed to shore up the beleaguered Syrian
regime." http://t.uani.com/MGBwbP
Bloomberg:
"It took just minutes for Lebanon's powerful Hezbollah chief to
appear on TV to silence protests after Syrian rebels grabbed 11 Lebanese
Shiites in May. Tehran's leadership also went into rapid-reaction mode
when gunmen seized 48 Iranians last week, but with a very different
objective: to make the abduction an international affair. The contrasting
approaches highlight how Syria's civil war is impacting the political
calculations of Bashar Assad's main Middle East backers - and hint at
possible separate endgame strategies by Tehran and its proxy Hezbollah if
the Syrian regime heads into free fall." http://t.uani.com/NQuLOz
Foreign Affairs
Reuters:
"A U.S. guided-missile destroyer rescued 10 Iranian seamen from a
burning dhow in the Gulf of Oman and was providing them with medical care
while working to coordinate their return home, the U.S. Navy said on
Thursday. Crew members from the USS James E. Williams rescued the
mariners on Wednesday after they were forced to abandon their burning
vessel. The dhow was flying an Iranian flag and all the crew members said
they were Iranian, the Navy said." http://t.uani.com/QleEK2
WSJ:
"Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is expected to visit Iran at
the end of this month to attend a Non-Aligned Movement summit, a
government official said Friday, spurring hopes of improving trade ties
between the two countries. Although India has moved to reduce purchases
of crude oil from Iran in recent months following western sanctions, Iran
still remains a major supplier to India. Shipments have become
increasingly difficult, however, with few companies willing to provide
insurance cover for transport of the crude, including Indian-owned
companies." http://t.uani.com/QMpddg
Opinion &
Analysis
Hope Hodge in
Human Events: "During his speech at the VFW
convention in Reno, Nev., earlier this month, presumptive Republican
presidential nominee Mitt Romney let fly some of his harshest rhetoric
toward the Iranian regime and the Obama administration's handling of its
nuclear threat. Saying the years since 2008 had only brought that threat
closer, he called for a suspension of all uranium enrichment activities
in Iran. 'I will use any means necessary to protect ourselves and the
region and to prevent the worst from happening while there's still time,'
he said. 'The surest path to danger is always weakness and indecision. In
the end, it's always resolve that moves events in our direction.' Last
week, a new package of economic sanctions on the hostile nation received
final approval from Congress, augmented by an executive order from
President Barack Obama expanding their scope. While lawmakers say they're
hopeful that the bipartisan bill will further hobble the Iranian economy,
others worry the sanctions won't go far enough, and fear spotty
enforcement may undermine America's threat posture... A spokesman for the
organization United Against Nuclear Iran, Nathan Carleton, told Human
Events he was glad to see the bill passed, but disappointed that more
financial loopholes, such as transactions through the international
banking network SWIFT, were not definitively closed. 'The bill doesn't
impose an economic blockade of the regime, and now is a perfect time for
that,' Carleton said. '(The sanctions are) not enough. They won't force
the regime's hand, because they still leave loopholes the regime can
exploit.'" http://t.uani.com/P4Nqdy
Yossi Melman &
Dan Raviv in The Guardian: "Binyamin Netanyahu,
usually an exemplar of self-restraint, lost his temper last week. In a
closed-door meeting discussing the military and intelligence chiefs who
oppose an air strike against Iran, the Israeli prime minister snapped,
'I'm responsible, and if there's a commission of inquiry later it's on
me,' according to well-orchestrated leaks by his aides. Netanyahu seems
to feel a historic - almost messianic - calling to stop Iran's nuclear
programme. Even if retaliation by Iran and its allies in Hamas and
Hezbollah takes the form of a lethal rain of rockets on Israel, he is
adamant that a nuclear-armed Iran would be far worse. His latest set of
outgoing signals seemed to suggest that an attack on Iran's nuclear
facilities may be likely before America's presidential election in
November. It is unclear if that is a coincidence, because of assessments
that Iranian progress in uranium enrichment and bomb design will have
reached a highly dangerous point by then; or maybe it is based on
Netanyahu's calculation that President Barack Obama will be more
supportive of Israel prior to election day - and perhaps not at all after
he wins or loses on 6 November. Some of Israel's security chiefs, who do
not hide their opposition to bombing Iran, say privately that they cannot
discern if their PM is bluffing. Netanyahu may be creating the impression
that an attack is imminent so as to goad the US into a firm promise to
obliterate Iran's nuclear plants. He is certainly sincere in his concern
about Iran's radical Islamists, who time and again call for the
liquidation of the Jewish state. In this sense Netanyahu walks in the
footsteps of Menachem Begin, prime minister from 1977 to 1983, who had a
doctrine named after him: the absolute Israeli determination that no
other nation in the Middle East will have nuclear weapons. The Begin
doctrine was successfully implemented twice: by Begin himself in June
1981, when Israel's air force destroyed Iraq's nuclear reactor; and in
September 2007, when PM Ehud Olmert sent Israeli warplanes to flatten a
Syrian nuclear reactor. Olmert's decision was even bolder than Begin's:
President George Bush had refused to order an American air raid, but
Israel went ahead anyway. And, unlike Iraq, Syria is an immediate
neighbour and had thousands of missiles that could hit every conceivable
installation in Israel. Netanyahu may well be encouraged by the world's
reaction. In 1981, even the pro-Israel president Ronald Reagan denounced
the bombing of the Baghdad reactor; but a decade later, during Desert
Storm, the US was thanking Israel for having ensured Saddam had no
nuclear arms. In 2007 the initial reaction was less harsh, because the
air raid on Syria was never acknowledged by the attackers in Jerusalem.
But Israeli leaders justifiably feel that the international community
might now be grateful to them again. There is concern in the US and
Israel that Syria's chemical weapons might fall into the hands of
al-Qaida or Hezbollah. Just imagine if the danger now involved what
proliferation experts call 'loose nukes' ... Iran is not Iraq or Syria.
The Iranians have drawn lessons from those two events. They dispersed
their nuclear facilities and buried them underground, making them more
difficult to reach and destroy. Success is thus less assured. Instead of
a quick, surgical strike, Israel will likely find itself in a long war of
attrition against Iran and Shia Muslims everywhere. In the name of
national pride and defending its Islamic revolution, Iran was willing to
lose millions of people in a long war against Iraq through the 80s. Above
all, perhaps, Israeli leaders must consider that striking Iran could drag
the US into a war against its wishes." http://t.uani.com/RwOKqF
Tony Badran in NOW
Lebanon: "In a steady stream of leaks and public
statements in recent days, a number of US officials have offered a window
into the Obama administration's current thinking on Syria. Specifically,
the administration has sought to highlight its top priorities in
post-Assad Syria. Regrettably, its views reveal that the incoherence that
has marred Washington's approach is now leading to strategically
self-defeating policy. The US interest in Syria was always
straightforward: breaking the Iranian alliance system through regime
change in Damascus. Instead of relentlessly pursuing this strategic
objective, the administration's policy in Syria appears to be geared
toward as much regime continuity as possible. As one unnamed American
official put it, 'You can't have a complete dissolution of that
[system].' The Obama administration is aiming for this outcome by pushing
the preservation of Syrian so-called 'state institutions.' 'We have to
make very sure that state institutions stay intact,' Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton stressed earlier this week... Generic terms such as
'state institutions' obscure the real nature of Syria under the Assad
dynasty. If the Syrian revolution has done one thing, however, it has
unmasked all of the regime's pretenses, laying bare the country's
sectarian realities. These realities have been manifest precisely in the
Syrian military. Defections have been overwhelmingly along sectarian
lines, while the regime has largely relied on predominantly Alawite
divisions, whose loyalty is not in question. Accordingly, the Syrian army
cannot possibly remain 'intact,' as the Obama administration desires, nor
should Washington want it to. What's certain is that it is not in US
interests to prevent the 'de-Alawization,' of the military and security
services-the same forces that have propped up the Assad regime for four
decades and have been the primary supporter of Iran's proxy, Hezbollah in
Lebanon. The success of the revolution, as Lee Smith recently wrote, 'can
only be defined according to whether or not such institutions are
destroyed once and for all.' Similarly, the administration has been
advocating an inclusive form of government post-Assad-shorthand for a
power-sharing agreement. However, such scenarios, too, open the door to
the preservation of an Iranian foothold in Damascus." http://t.uani.com/QVgqb5
|
|
Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against
Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear
Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive
media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with
discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please
email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com
United Against Nuclear
Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a
commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a
regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons. UANI is an
issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own
interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of
nuclear weapons.
|
|
|
Nice Article! Thanks for sharing with us.
ReplyDeleteExecutive Search Firms India