Friday, September 7, 2012

Eye on Iran: UANI Anti-MTN Adverts Get Local Gag in South Africa








For continuing coverage follow us on Twitter and join our Facebook group.
  
Top Stories

Mail & Guardian:
"A major US lobby group's shock advertising campaign, alleging that MTN is 'profiting from torture' in Iran, has been blocked by local agencies.    But it claims that South African advertising companies have refused to erect the billboards because of the influence of the telecoms giant. United Against Nuclear Iran, an organisation founded by the late United States ambassador Richard Holbrooke, claimed this month that MTN, which has a 49% stake in Iran's second-biggest cellphone network, has provided the regime with the means to suppress and track dissenters, some of whom are later tortured... This week, Nathan Carleton, spokesperson for the lobby group, told the Mail & Guardian that, since early May, artwork and an initial undisclosed budget was offered for the erection of billboards opposite MTN's headquarters in Gauteng. The advert shows a picture of Iranian plain-clothes officers beating a civilian with clubs, alongside the words: 'MTN helps the Iranian regime terrorize and oppress its citizens.' But, at least half a dozen South African advertising companies have refused to print and erect the advert, including Adreach, which called the campaign 'distasteful', Media24, which cited a conflict of interest in its business with MTN, and Outdoor Media, which said it even feared for its staff's safety, owing to 'potential retaliation from other parties'. Only Alliance Media is still considering running the campaign." http://t.uani.com/Nfv9v3

CNBC: "Already pinched by sanctions, Iran's oil revenues dropped sharply in July to possibly less than a third of what it took in a year ago. Iran exports dropped off sharply in the first month after new U.S. and EU sanctions took effect, and its oil revenues plummeted in July to $2.9 billion from $9.8 billion in July, 2011, estimates Rhodium Group partner Trevor Houser. Houser also estimates, after studying partner trade data, that customer receipts of Iranian crude were about a third the amount of last July, and half the amount of June... Houser said the economic sanctions are working more quickly than some had expected, and the lack of impact on Iran has prompted calls in Washington for even tougher financial sanctions. 'I don't think we'll see Iranian exports decline any further for the next couple of months, but the upside for Iran is pretty limited as well-maybe 1.1 or 1.2 million in August and not much more in September,' he said." http://t.uani.com/Qqe8OH

Daily Telegraph: "Iran is intensifying its support for the regime of Bashar al-Assad by sending 150 senior Revolutionary Guards commanders to Syria to help repel opposition attempts to overthrow the government.Western intelligence officials say that Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has personally sanctioned the dispatch of the experienced officers to ensure that the Assad regime, Iran's most important regional ally, survives the threat to its survival. In addition, Iran has shipped hundreds of tons of military equipment, including guns, rockets, and shells, to Syria through the regular air corridor that has been established between Damascus and Tehran." http://t.uani.com/Qqe8OH
Lebanon Banking Campaign 
Nuclear Program 

Reuters: "Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu blew up at the U.S. ambassador last month because he was 'at wits' end' over what he sees as the Obama administration's lack of clarity on Iran's nuclear program, a U.S. congressman who was at the meeting said. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, a Republican, made his first public comments about the late August meeting in Israel in an interview with Michigan's WJR radio on Tuesday... 'Right now the Israelis don't believe that this administration is serious when they say all options are on the table, and more importantly neither do the Iranians. That's why the program is progressing,' Rogers said." http://t.uani.com/Rj3Kdq

AP: "Israel's defense minister said differences remain with United States over Iran's dispute nuclear program, despite efforts by Israel and the U.S. to come to an agreement on the issue. Ehud Barak told a meeting of his Independence Party that "the clock is ticking at a different pace" for the U.S. and Israel, suggesting disagreements remain on the timeline for any attack on Iran's nuclear facilities... Barak, who spoke hours after meeting the U.S. Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. James A. Winnefeld, reiterated that Israel reserves the right to carry out a strike unilaterally. He added, however, that there was 'no doubt' about Washington's 'readiness to face the challenge on every level.'" http://t.uani.com/Rt0y9y

Sanctions

WSJ: "When European Union foreign ministers meet today in Cyprus, their most consequential discussion may well be on efforts to increase the pressure on Iran over its nuclear program. With nuclear talks essentially having gone nowhere for months - and no prospect of fresh top-level negotiations - in the offing, diplomats say a group of member states will push for new sanctions on Iran which would be ready in a month's time. 'There have been talks about new sanctions already, not among the 27 (member states) but in smaller circles,' said one diplomat. He said Friday's EU-wide talks would not get into specifics but would ask member states to back the idea of a new round of sanctions. 'As there has been no progress in the talks with Iran it is necessary to continue with the pressure against Iran. So we think that new sanctions will be necessary,' the person said." http://t.uani.com/RsVLoy

Reuters: "Britain's Foreign Secretary William Hague urged the European Union on Friday to impose new sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme, as Israel continues to threaten military action. 'It is necessary to increase pressure on Iran, to intensify sanctions, to add further to EU sanctions that are already enforced,' Hague told reporters before a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Cyprus. He did not specify what form any new sanctions would take or whether the ministers would discuss the issue in detail." http://t.uani.com/OVDNNj

Human Rights


Guardian: "In January of this year the parents of the exiled Iranian actor Golshifteh Farahani took a call at their apartment in Tehran from a man who said he was an official of the supreme court of the Islamic Republic. He began shouting at her father, telling him that his daughter would be punished, that her breasts would be cut off and presented to him on a plate... The day the video was posted, when what she calls the 'fire' started, the official Fars news agency in Tehran issued a communique lacerating her, saying that the pictures showed the 'hidden, disgusting face of cinema'. This kind of opprobrium had never before been poured on an artist, however much they had upset the regime. Her exile was now a banishment." http://t.uani.com/NXoyBd

Domestic Politics 

Reuters: "Iran will hold presidential elections on June 14 next year, the Interior Ministry said on Friday, the first such vote since a violent crackdown on protests over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's disputed re-election in 2009. The 2013 presidential vote is expected to be a contest between candidates representing Ahmadinejad's allies and his more conservative opponents. Ahmadinejad himself cannot run for a third term due to a constitutional limit. 'The next presidential election will be held at the same time as municipal elections,' the official IRNA news agency said, citing the Interior Ministry." http://t.uani.com/P7GVYt  

Opinion & Analysis

UANI President Amb. Kristen Silverberg & UANI Senior European Advisor Dr. August Hanning in Reuters: "The case of Standard Chartered Bank has demonstrated that there are still gaps in the international sanctions regime concerning Iran. In the financial sector, the existing regime can be improved. However, the European sanctions targeting the Iranian oil and gas sector also have significant weaknesses. It is necessary to identify these   weaknesses and to close them as quickly as possible. In January and in July the European Union implemented an important new sanctions regime prohibiting the importation of oil from Iran. These sanctions are significant, and provide a real opportunity to increase pressure on Iran to make meaningful concessions on its nuclear program. However, past experience with Iran has demonstrated that government's skill at evading international sanctions. To make these sanctions meaningful, the international community needs to continue to work to close off any avenue that would allow Iran to support its nuclear program through oil revenues... Another way to limit Iranian oil sales is to focus on efforts to disrupt Iran's tools for oil deliveries - its tankers. Earlier this summer, the U.S. Treasury announced sanctions against the National Iranian Tanker Company (NITC) and the vessels that it controls. This is a positive step, however, concentrating on tankers will only be partially effective. Iran has already begun the process of reflagging, repainting, and renaming the ships to disguise their origin, then transferring their official ownership to Iranian and non-Iranian front companies. As a consequence, these vessels will continue to operate in large parts of the globe while the international community is trying to catch up. This is a difficult and expensive endeavor, delivering only partial success at best. As long as these tankers are allowed to operate, they continue to serve as the financial lifeline of the Islamic Republic. To fully enforce the EU sanctions, and cut off avenues for Iranian deception and circumvention, UANI-ISD Iran Initiative advocates measures to ban sales of spare parts for Iranian tankers. By denying access to spare parts, Europe can make it considerably more difficult and certainly more expensive for Iran to sell its crude. The majority of Iranian tanker engines are manufactured by a small group of European companies. The highly specialised nature of these engines, along with the fact that multiple tankers are often ordered and produced at once, means that many of the vessels share the same diesel engine design. The Sulzer RTA84T engine for example, powers at least nine different Iranian tankers. This means that targeting even a small number of engine spare parts could impact on a comparatively large proportion of Iran's oil transport fleet. Measures against tanker spare parts will result in substantial, sustainable pressure on the oil flow of the Iranian regime, potentially cutting it off from billions of dollars in proceeds and compelling Iran to at last agree to meaningful and concrete concessions on its nuclear programme. If the current negotiations were to make some progress they could open the way to a peaceful solution. If they fail, the Persian Gulf is likely to be further, dangerously destabilised. It is in Europe's interest to do everything possible to ensure a successful conclusion of the talks with Iran." http://t.uani.com/NSbnS9

UANI Advisory Board Member Olli Heinonen & Simon Henderson in WSJ: "Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei claimed last week that his government isn't interested in nuclear weapons: 'Our motto is nuclear energy for all and nuclear weapons for none,' he said. A better perspective was provided almost simultaneously from the world's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, which on Aug. 30 released its latest report on Iran's nuclear activities. The report, written in a mix of bureaucrat-speak and obscure science, nevertheless conveys a worrying message. It shows that Iran continues to expand its capacity for enriching uranium. There are now two new groups of centrifuges installed at Fordow-the hardened site built under a mountain near the holy city of Qom-which signals a doubling of the site's capacity since May. Crucially, Iran continues to stockpile uranium enriched to 3.5% and 20% purity-levels for which Iran has no immediate use unless it is planning to make an atomic bomb. (Its stockpiles of 20% uranium far exceed Tehran's claimed needs for a reactor making medical isotopes.) Iran is now operating around 11,000 centrifuges categorized as 'IR-1,' which are based on a Dutch design acquired by the Pakistani scientist A.Q. Khan. This means that, despite international sanctions and surveillance, Iran has acquired (and perhaps continues to acquire) important supplies from abroad, particularly maraging steel and high-strength aluminum. Alternatively, and no less worrying, is the possibility that Iran is now able to produce such special metals domestically. A piece of apparent good news is that Iran's IR-1 centrifuges are performing at half their design potential, producing less enriched uranium than they might otherwise. This indicates quality problems, perhaps due to the manufacturing process or to the raw materials used. It also appears that Iran remains slow in developing more advanced centrifuge types. This could be because of design and manufacturing problems. Or Iran could be saving the advanced centrifuges for another secret, yet-to-be-revealed facility. We can only speculate. Judging from this report, Iran seems determined to achieve the capability of producing nuclear materials suitable for nuclear weapons. Whether it has made a decision to produce a fully operational nuclear weapon is unclear. (The Obama administration says it hasn't, according to its latest declared intelligence on Iran's government.) Going forward, the matter of advanced centrifuges will be important to watch. If Iran acquires or develops them, it could pursue a "fast break-out"-moving within months to 90%-enriched uranium, which is weapons-grade-using its already sizable and growing inventories of 20%. Once it has five or six bombs-worth of 90% enriched uranium, it would essentially be a latent nuclear-weapon state-whether it has actually tested a bomb or not. Indeed, given the intelligence uncertainties involved with monitoring whether such a secretive program moves to "break-out," even a stockpile of five or six bombs-worth of 20%-enriched uranium would effectively make Iran a nuclear-weapon state." http://t.uani.com/NPGjZ7

Michael Rubin in Commentary: "On Tuesday, The Washington Post published an article headlined, 'In Iran, Sanctions Take Toll on the Sick.' The headline and the story trumpet the human suffering U.S. banking sanctions have reportedly visited upon the Iranian people. Correspondent Najmeh Bozorgmehr, reporting from Tehran, interviews the parents of a boy with hemophilia who had to travel 400 miles to Tehran in order to find the drugs necessary for his treatment. Ahmad Ghavidel, the head of Iran's Hemophilia Society said, 'This is a blatant hostage-taking of the most vulnerable people by countries which claim they care about human rights. Even a few days of delay can have serious consequences like hemorrhage and disability.' Bozorgmehr also talked to the heads of the Tehran Province Thalassemia Association and an adviser to the Iran Charity Association to Support Kidney Patients. The story would be tragic if sanctions really were to blame. In 1999, when I was studying in Tehran, I met a couple from the southwestern province of Khuzistan who were in the city because they could not access the facilities or medicine necessary to treat their cancer-stricken daughter in their home province. Such stories were common. Corruption and the regime's perverse priorities took their toll on Iranian health. Not surprisingly, those with chronic and rare conditions suffered most. If the same problems afflicted Iranian society years before U.S. banking sanctions as after U.S. banking sanctions, then it stands to reason that sanctions are not to blame. Perhaps, rather, the regime is. If those who are most opposed to sanctions truly cared about Iranians living in Iran, they would be as active if not more in seeking an end to what truly has been and become an odious regime, not through foreign force but rather by encouraging aid to independent labor unions and civil society organizations seeking to restore the legacy of Iran's brief period of constitutional and parliamentary democracy. The episode, of course, recalls accusations of mass deaths resulting from international sanctions on Iraq. Iranian officials are savvy, and they know how to craft effective propaganda." http://t.uani.com/Ng1O3R 

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.





No comments:

Post a Comment