Germany: New Ad Campaign to Counter Muslim Radicalization

by Soeren Kern
September 5, 2012 at 5:00 am

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3321/germany-ad-campaign-muslim-radicalization

Send

Comment

RSS

Be the first of your friends to like this.

"Salafists are fighting the liberal-democratic legal system and in its place they want to introduce their radical ideology in Germany." — German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich

The German government has launched a nationwide poster campaign aimed at fighting against the radicalization of young Muslim immigrants.
The ad campaign is the brainchild of German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich, who has been leading Germany's multifaceted response (here, here and here) to the rise of radical Islam there.
Beginning on September 21, the posters, which feature photos of four different Muslims under the caption "MISSING," will be put up in the immigrant areas in Germany's large cities (mainly in Berlin, Hamburg and Bonn), and will feature text in German, Turkish and Arabic.
The Interior Ministry says the posters -- which feature a helpline telephone number for worried acquaintances and relatives -- are designed to "counter radicalization" and "provide support."
One of the posters includes the word "MISSING" in very large print above a portrait of a young man with dark hair and reads: "This is our son Ahmad. We miss him, because we do not recognize him anymore. He is withdrawing more and more, becoming more radical every day. We are afraid of losing him altogether -- to religious fanatics and terrorist groups."
Similar fictional "MISSING" posters feature "my brother Hassan," "my friend Fatima," and "our son Tim."
All of the ads include an appeal to phone the "Radicalization Advice Center," known in German as the Beratungsstelle Radikalisierung, which was launched on January 1, 2012. It is part of an initiative called "Security Partnership: Working Together with Muslims for Security," which the German Interior Ministry hopes will "counter the Islamist radicalization of young people."
According to documentation published by the anti-radicalization center, "Parents, relatives, friends and teachers are often the first to notice that a young person is becoming radicalized, and are also often the last people with whom a young person maintains contact despite becoming increasingly isolated. In order to provide them with the best possible support in such a difficult situation and so to jointly counter the radicalization of the people close to you, professional consulting services are now available."
The text continues: "German Interior Minister Friedrich, within the framework of the 'Prevention Summit' on June 24, 2011, confirmed that the radicalization of Muslim youth and young adults by Islamist groups would be resolutely pursued. The counseling center is an important element of this. Those within the social environment of the affected individuals are usually the first to notice when a son, student, friend or colleague change their religious attitude or even their entire worldview, increasingly withdraw from their existing environment, turn off from their past and embrace a radical spectrum, and are increasingly guided by ideologies that are incompatible with the principles of a liberal democratic state."
According to the center, the victims "often pull back sharply from their previous environment and refuse to 'mix' anymore. This leads to friends, but especially parents, to uncertainty: they are in a conflict between the potentially welcome religiosity of the child and the concomitant concern that their child might fall into the 'wrong circles' and that they might lose contact with them. This is especially true for non-Muslim parents, whose children have converted to Islam, and who have many questions about Islam as a religion."
The text concludes: "In these cases, professional advice is important and necessary. It is important to recognize the problem as such and to accept to resolve pressing issues and finally to consider ways to counter the radicalization process. The 'Radicalization Advice Center' at the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees is in close contact with various consultancies and knows contact persons as well as networks for special topics in all areas. The offer of counseling is for all citizens provided free of charge."
According to the Interior Ministry, the Radicalization Advice Center is currently handling about 20 cases, mostly involving German parents whose children have converted to Islam. The objective of the poster campaign, which will cost about €300,000 ($375,000), is to reach out to Muslim parents who may be concerned about the radicalization of their children.
But many Muslims have been outraged by the campaign, which they say will foment more prejudice against Muslim immigrants. In an interview with the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung, Aydan Özoguz, a Turkish-German deputy national chairman of the center-left Social Democrats (SPD), said: "The pictures of nice-looking Muslims in the context of this campaign suggest that anyone may be a fanatic or even a terrorist." She also says the Interior Ministry has not clearly defined what "radical" actually means in concrete terms: "Will the Interior Ministry intervene the moment my child converts to Islam?"
Germany has about four million Muslims, who make up approximately five percent of the population -- Western Europe's second-biggest Muslim population after France, with Turks being the single biggest minority.
In July, the German state of Lower Saxony published a practical guide to extremist Islam to help citizens identify tell-tale signs of Muslims who are becoming radicalized.
Security officials said the objective of the document is to mitigate the threat of home-grown terrorist attacks by educating Germans about radical Islam and encouraging them to refer suspected Islamic extremists to the authorities -- a move that reflects mounting concern in Germany over the growing assertiveness of Salafist Muslims, who openly state that they want to establish Islamic Sharia law in the country and across Europe.
The 54-page document, "Radicalization Processes in the Context of Islamic Extremism and Terrorism," which provides countless details about the Islamist scene in Germany, paints a worrisome picture of the threat of radical Islam there.
According to the report, German security agencies estimate that approximately 1,140 individuals living in Germany pose a high risk of becoming Islamic terrorists. The document also states that up to 100,000 native Germans have converted to Islam in recent years, and that "intelligence analysis has found that converts are especially susceptible to radicalization…Security officials believe that converts comprise between five to ten percent of the Salafists."
In a June 8 interview with the German newspaper Die Welt, Interior Minister Friedrich stated: "Radical Salafism is like a hard drug. All of those who succumb to her become violent."
Friedrich also said that "the threshold for [Islamist] violence has decreased in an alarming way. There can be only one answer: The government must make it clear with all the force of the law that our democracy is fortified. Salafists are fighting the liberal-democratic legal system and in its place they want to introduce their radical ideology in Germany. But we will not let that happen. We will defend our freedom and our security with all our might."
Soeren Kern is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute. He is also Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group. Follow him on Facebook.

Related Topics: Germany | Soeren Kern

Antisemitism Alive and Well in Romania
Or How the Holocaust Never Happened

by Michael Curtis
September 5, 2012 at 4:30 am

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3323/romania-antisemitism

Send

Comment

RSS

Be the first of your friends to like this.

What is significant is that it was not the Nazi policy that triggered the massacre of Jews, but the Romanian government itself with the enthusiastic articulation of the military as well as the the broader society.

The virus of antisemitism is alive and well in Eastern Europe, and so is the denial of the Holocaust. It is particularly disconcerting that a younger generation in Romania, and more than likely everywhere else in the world, should be infected with this virus, and is -- or claims to be -- ignorant of the real treatment of Jews in the 20^th century.
Dan Sova, a 39 year old Romanian lawyer and Social Democrat, who has been a Senator in the Parliament since 2008, was promoted to the position of Minister for Parliamentary Relations by the Prime Minister Victor Ponta on August 6 after saying on a television broadcast on March 5, that "no Jew suffered on Romanian territory (during the Holocaust) thanks to Marshal Antonescu." Two days later Sova was removed "temporarily" from office as speaker of his political party. He has also said that "only 24 Jews were killed during the Iasi pogrom (of June 28-29, 1941) by the German army."
Both statements by Sova were false and malicious. Ion Antonescu, the pro-Nazi dictator of Romania during World War II was "leader of the state," prime minister, foreign minister, defense minister, and self-appointed Marshal. He joined the Tripartite Pact of Germany, Italy, and Japan against the Allies in November 1940, two months after it had been signed. He also established close personal contact with Hitler. It was Antonescu who on June 27, 1941, ordered the commander of the military garrison of the town of Iasi, in northeast Romania, to "cleanse" the city of its Jewish population. The action was not instigated by the Nazis but by the Romanian authorities and the Romanian army on their own initiative.
It is estimated that during the two days of the pogrom in Iasi, between 13,000 and 15,000 Jews were massacred in the streets or else died in the death trains on which 100 Jews were herded into each boxcar; most died of thirst, starvation, or suffocation. The actions of the Romanian regime in the Holocaust led to the deaths, not of 24 Jews, but a number estimated to be between 280,000 and 380,000 Romanian Jews -- most likely the larger number, in the territories under its control.
It was not Nazi policy that triggered the massacre of Jews but the Romanian government itself -- with the enthusiastic participation of the military, and the endorsement of the broader society, similar to the better-known participation of the French Vichy regime and French authorities during the war.
In the period after World War II, from 1945 to 1989, Romania was under Communist control, first by the Soviet Union and then as an independent country; information about the country's actions during the war was largely suppressed. Few Romanians were aware of the involvement of their country during the Holocaust. Perhaps the kindest thing to be said of Dan Sova is that his schooling did not include any information about the Holocaust. It is difficult, however, to believe that a young lawyer educated at the University of Bucharest could be so ignorant. When criticism arose of his promotion on August 6, four days later he confessed that his remarks on the Holocaust were "completely wrong." It would be nice to take at face value his plans to make concrete actions on the matter, one of which will be a course of lectures on the Holocaust.
No matter the degree of sincerity in Sova's apologies and regrets, a few lessons could be drawn from his case: there is a critical need to keep on discrediting Holocaust deniers, ranging from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Iran to Ernst Zundel, a German who lived in Canada. Education, especially of the young, about the Holocaust is urgent and essential to put an end to the falsehoods of distortions of history by individuals such as David Irving in Britain, Robert Faurisson in France or Louis Farrakhan in the U.S. Both the young and the old should continue to be informed of the assertions of the deniers -- the allegations that the Diary of Anne Frank was a hoax because parts of it were written with a ball point pen, or that Auschwitz was too small to have been an extermination camp -- to be able to refute them.
The ignorance of Dan Sova shows how important it is to reject the argument that too much attention has been given to the Holocaust, and that 20^th century historians have over-emphasized Jewish suffering. On March 17, 1990, for example, Pat Buchanan wrote in the New York Post about what he called "so-called Holocaust survivor syndrome," which he said involved group fantasies of martyrdom and heroics. It is painful that some Holocaust deniers, trying to make the case against the existence of Israel, have argued that Jews should be regarded not as victims but as victimizers. The Catholic Bishop Richard Williamson, who in November 2008 denied the existence of Nazi gas chambers (although he did say that between 200,000 to 300,000 Jews perished in Nazi concentration camps) also declared that the Holocaust was a Jewish invention so that "we would prostrate ourselves on our knees before them and approve their new state of Israel." As Deborah Lipstadt has written, these people accuse Jews of using "the world's sympathy to displace another people so that Israel could be created."
One can admit that Nazi Germany was not the only perpetrator of villainous and criminal behavior. The twentieth century abounds with similar criminal acts. One should acknowledge and deplore, especially, threats of genocide, the treatment of Armenians, people in Cambodia, Tibet, Mali, Nigeria, the Balkans, Sudan, and the Congo. Yet, the Holocaust was unique in its scope and number of casualties. It remains unique in spite of the cavalier denial or minimization of it by ignorant and bigoted people like Dan Sova.
Michael Curtis is author of Should Israel Exist? A Sovereign Nation under Attack by the International Community.

Related Topics: Michael Curtis

To subscribe to the this mailing list, go to http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/list_subscribe.php

Gatestone Institute