British Jihadists and the UK Surveillance State
by Soeren Kern
• June 27, 2014 at 5:00 am
"The whole area of intercept
needs to be looked at. We have got a real debate, and it is a genuine debate
in a democracy, between the libertarians who say the state must not get too
powerful and pretty much the rest of us who say the state must protect itself."
— Liam Fox, Former British Secretary of Defense
In his testimony, Farr defends
the practice because Britain has for "many years faced a serious threat
from terrorism," especially the threat derived from "militant
Islamist terrorists." He says the practice has prevented terrorist
attacks and saved lives.
An
ISIS recruitment video released in June 2014, titled "There is no life
without Jihad", features British and Australian Muslims fighting in
Syria and Iraq.
A recent spike in the number of British jihadists fighting with Sunni
militant groups in Syria and Iraq is fuelling a heated debate over how much
government surveillance is necessary to keep the United Kingdom safe from
domestic terrorism.
The British government is asking for additional surveillance powers to
monitor British jihadists who might be planning attacks in the UK after their
return from the fighting in the Middle East.
But privacy groups counter that the British state has already amassed
massive surveillance powers, and that what the government really wants is a
free rein to monitor all of the communications of every man, woman and child
in Britain.
British Prime Minister David Cameron has warned that the greatest threat
to national security is from British citizens and other Europeans fighting
with the Sunni militant group Islamic State in Iraq and Syria [ISIS]. At a
press conference on June 17, he said:
|
To subscribe to the this mailing list, go to http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/list_subscribe.php |
Friday, June 27, 2014
British Jihadists and the UK Surveillance State
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment