Just a Bit More Beheading than We Are Used To
by Douglas Murray
• August 24, 2014 at 5:00 am
There has
been a debate in the UK press suggesting we should hope that some of these
ISIS killers come back to Britain, realize that jihad was all a phase and
then head off to university for the start of the new term.
The
beheading of James Foley was terrible, she stressed, "because we don't
know what [his] views were."
Is there
a time when even "combatants" -- or anyone else -- should be
treated in this way? And who is to say who is a combatant and who not?
Who is surprised? That is one question I have most wanted to know since
the video was released of the murder of American journalist James Foley. The
politicians keep expressing it. And interviewers have kept asking people
whether they feel it. But who can honestly say that he was surprised to learn
that the murderer of the American journalist turned out to be a
"British" man?
Did anyone really still think that a British Islamist would not be
capable of doing this? Why wouldn't he, if he is capable of doing it in Syria
or Iraq? After all, it was only last year that two other Islamists beheaded
one of our own soldiers – Drummer Lee Rigby – in broad daylight in London.
And it is only twelve years since another Londoner – Omar Sheikh – arranged
the abduction and decapitation of another American journalist, Daniel Pearl.
|
|
To subscribe to the this mailing list, go to http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/list_subscribe.php |
Sunday, August 24, 2014
Just a Bit More Beheading than We Are Used To
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment