Berkeley,
Bazian, and Barghouti Promote BDS
by Cinnamon Stillwell
FrontPage Magazine
September 30, 2015
|
|
Share:
|
Be the first of your
friends to like this.
A member of a Berkeley, California city
commission ostensibly devoted to the "social welfare needs"
of "low-income residents," who was dismissed after introducing a
boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) resolution has found a champion in
UC Berkeley Department of Near Eastern studies (NES) lecturer Hatem
Bazian.
Bazian provided the introduction to a September 18 lecture co-sponsored by NES and
delivered by Omar Barghouti, co-founder of the Palestinian Campaign for the
Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI). An audience of
approximately two hundred, comprised mostly of students and including local
anti-Israel activists, twenty or so women in hijabs, and a tall man with a
"Palestine" sash around his neck who, during the Q&A, claimed
to work for the virulently anti-Israel online magazine Electronic
Intifada, filled a large lecture hall in UC Berkeley's Dwinelle
Hall.
Before introducing Barghouti, Bazian rallied the audience to the
"cause" of Cheryl Davila, the former Human Welfare &
Community Action Commission (HWCAC) member. Davila was removed
from her post at the outset of HWCAC's September meeting by City Councilman
Darryl Moore, who
appointed her in 2009, because she refused to withdraw the "Divestment
From the Israeli Occupation" resolution
(see page 70) she sponsored. Moore alleged
that Davila neglected to notify him about the controversial proposal and
claimed it was a misuse of the commission. HWCAC will revise
and vote on the resolution in October and if passed, it will proceed to
the Berkeley City Council for a vote. The council has rejected two previous
Israel divestment measures.
Davila was in the audience, and after introducing her to loud applause,
Bazian blamed her removal on an imagined bias against anti-Israel
activists:
[T]his is the type of democracy you face when you deal with Palestine. I
will say that you [the commission] have a progressive agenda except when it
comes to Palestine.
He then made a ludicrous comparison between Davila's situation and that
of civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr., whose opposition to the
Vietnam War, Bazian claimed, culminated in his assassination:
Seventy-seven percent of the American public was against Martin Luther
King. . . . Most of the newspapers nationally were against Martin Luther
King because he opposed the Vietnam War. Therefore, today, you have the
Martin Luther King building here; you have the street . . . in downtown
Berkeley. We have many streets and many schools across the country. MLK was
right. And, Cheryl, in your resolution, you were right and history will
prove you right.
Bazian, director of UC Berkeley's Islamophobia Research &
Documentation Project, is accustomed to melodramatic claims of victimhood,
evidence to the
contrary notwithstanding. He is also the founder of the radical
anti-Israel group Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP),
a point of pride driven home by his admonishment to reporters in
attendance: "At least historically be accurate: SJP was created on
this campus in 1992." The fact that SJP—which, along with Bazian's
other creation,
American Muslims for Palestine (AMP),
co-sponsored Barghouti's lecture—endorsed
Davila's divestment resolution further demonstrates his bias.
A proponent of the BDS movement, Bazian urged audience members to
"sign the mailing list" for the U.S. Campaign for the Academic
and Cultural Boycott of Israel (USACBI),
another co-sponsor of the lecture that counts a good number of Middle East
studies academics among its organizers
and endorsers. Engaging in predictably spurious comparisons between
Israel and apartheid-era South Africa, Bazian disdained any move, then or
now, towards "constructive engagement."
Barghouti followed by explaining "Why it's so important for
academics in the country to support the academic boycott." As a
movement that, he maintained, "rejects all forms of discrimination,
including anti-Semitism," BDS is something "any decent
liberal" should support. If one were to judge by Barghouti's delivery
alone, which was calm, measured, and, at times, humorous, singling out the
world's lone Jewish state for economic boycott—which he excused by citing
"U.S. support" as the deciding factor—would appear entirely
reasonable.
Why boycott academia, "the most progressive sector of any
society?" Barghouti asked rhetorically. His answer cited Israeli
academe's complicity in "branding" the country as what it, in
fact, truly is: a liberal democracy with gay and women's rights. He then
accused Israeli universities of being "entrenched in their role of
planning, implementing, justifying, and whitewashing Israel's regime of
oppression." He claimed that BDS "targets institutions, not
individuals"; thus, it's acceptable for "an Israeli
professor" to be "invited to teach at Berkeley," given that
there is no "agreement with an Israeli university" or any
"institutional links." Barghouti asserted that such a boycott
constitutes a mere loss of "privileges," not a "threat to
academic freedom."
Of PACBI's role in the American BDS movement, Barghouti bragged that
"spreading the academic boycott to U.S.
academic associations" has been its primary achievement. The
significance of the Modern Language Association, the American Studies
Association, and others considering BDS
resolutions is that the "taboo" of discussing "Israel
and boycott in the same sentence" has been "shattered."
Today, he concluded ominously, "It's not beyond the pale."
For around twenty minutes during Barghouti's lecture, a small group of student
protesters stood silently in the front of the room with signs reading,
"Banning the Ideas of One Nation Is Discrimination" and "UC
Berkeley Academic Departments Support Limiting Academia." Neither
Barghouti nor the audience acknowledged their presence and it was a far cry
from the disruptive protests, heckling, and violence that has
met pro-Israel speakers on campus.
It's difficult to say which was more egregious: Bazian's encouragement
of the city of Berkeley to boycott Israel, Barghouti's coolly delivered
apologia for bigotry, or the fact that an event devoted entirely to
cheerleading for BDS was co-sponsored
by UC Berkeley's Department of Near Eastern studies. It is a testament to
the state of the field that contempt for the truth and the embrace of agitprop
and indoctrination over rigorous, objective scholarship is, to paraphrase
one of the speakers, no longer beyond the pale.
Cinnamon Stillwell is the West Coast Representative for Campus Watch, a project
of the Middle East Forum.
She can be reached at stillwell@meforum.org.
This
text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral
whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author,
date, place of publication, and original URL.
Related Items
|
No comments:
Post a Comment