|
|
|
|
Steven Emerson,
Executive Director
|
June 2, 2016
|
Absurdity
Reigns: Of Want Ads and Counter-Radicalization
by Patrick Dunleavy
IPT News
June 2, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Share:  
|
  Be the
first of your friends to like this.
 The theater of the
absurd seems to have found a place to perform in the current atmosphere
created by the threat of Islamic terrorism in both Europe and the United
States.
Belgium, which has seen its deeply-rooted radical Islamic nature exposed
by the attacks in Paris and Brussels, thinks it has the answer to the
phenomenon of Islamic radicalization. The Muslim Executive of Belgium placed an ad seeking counselors to deradicalize inmates. The
advertisement lists the following qualifications, looking for candidates
with "sufficient religious knowledge" and a "resistance to
stress."
In essence, Belgium outsourced hiring for this experimental state-run
deradicalization program to the country's religious leaders.
It's a bad idea that cannot work, and is especially untenable if
Americans tried to follow suit.
Can you imagine if, after any terrorist attack or plot in the United
States, instead of responding with force against the terrorist
organizations that perpetrated those heinous acts, we simply placed an
advertisement in the help wanted section of a newspaper announcing the job
opening for someone who could "cure the problem"?
We'd call it what it is, naive foolishness.
Yet 15 years after 9/11, we find that some have actually taken that
approach to the threat of Islamic radicalization and the acts of terrorism
it produces.
In European city after city – Brussels, Copenhagen, Paris, Toulouse – we
have seen innocent civilians – men, women, and children – maimed or killed
by people who were radicalized. Now we know that many of the terrorists
were radicalized while serving time in prison for petty offenses. It was in
the cauldron of the penitentiary that they were exposed to radical Islamic
terrorists as well as to literature and clergy that facilitated their
transition from crook to jihadist.
The United States is not immune to this disease. In Chattanooga,
Garland, Texas, New York City, Philadelphia, San Bernardino and elsewhere
individuals who had become radicalized committed attacks and murder in the
name of Allah.
Authorities know that the journey to Islamic radicalization may take
many paths including social media, videos, literature, or a charismatic
facilitator. But the end result is always the same. It produces people who
are willing to kill anyone, including themselves, while thinking they are
pleasing God. False promises of virgins and paradise spur them on.
Those who are captured or arrested are confined. They are removed from
society, however no effective program has been found to undo the
radicalization process to which they succumbed.
What is the solution?
A program that seeks to hire more "religious counselors"
certainly would not be a realistic solution in the United States. We have
yet to find an adequate way to vet Islamic clergy applying for positions in
the U.S. Bureau of Prisons even though the Inspector General for the
Department of Justice in 2004 stated it was necessary to thwart prison
radicalization. Recently, it was discovered that a radical imam, Fouad El
Bayly, was working as a chaplain at Maryland's Cumberland Federal
Correctional Institution. In 2007, El Bayly publicly called Somali-born activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali
an apostate who deserved death.
His appointment exposed the crack in the wall that allows religious
workers who hold radical Islamic views into correctional facilities.
Another questionable program designed to counter the Islamic
radicalization problem has been initiated in the United States.
Minneapolis has seen a fair share of Islamic radicalization among its
Somali youth. Numerous Somali American young men have left the U.S. to join
Al Shabaab and the Islamic State after being exposed to radical Islamic
teachings through social media and videos.
In an effort to deal with the problem of the radicalization of as many
as 10 people recently arrested for attempting to provide material support
to a terrorist organization, Minnesota U.S. District Judge Michael Davis
has devised a deradicalization program that includes hiring
researcher Daniel
Koehler, who has dealt with the neo-Nazi movement in Germany, to
provide counseling and training for both inmates and staff.
The program has already met with criticism from both law enforcement and
civil rights activists. Law enforcement officials point to the first
inmate, Abdullahi Yusuf, as a sign of the program's potential
danger.
Yusuf was arrested in 2014 when he attempted to board a flight to
Turkey to join ISIS and fight in Syria. While awaiting trial, he was
admitted to the program for deradicalization counseling and was allowed to
stay in a halfway house instead of in jail. Less than four months later he
was removed from the program after he was found with a box cutter.
The 9/11 attacks proved how devastating the tool can be in the hands of
a terrorist.
Further resistance to the judge's deradicalization program came from the
defense attorney appointed to represent Adan Abdihamid Farah. Farah was arrested last year when
he attempted to travel to Syria and fight alongside other Islamic State
jihadists. "If the deradicalization is for him (Farah) to moderate his
religious beliefs, I can't do that," defense attorney Kenneth Udoibok told the Wall Street Journal.
Law enforcement officials are concerned that any government program
designed to modify an individual's religious belief system, no matter how
well intentioned, would run afoul of the First Amendment protection of
religious freedom. It could open up prison officials to litigation filed
under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Absent modifying someone's radical Islamic beliefs, the program is left
with offering job training, educational programs, psychological therapy, or
family counseling. All of these options have been in the correctional
environment for decades. Even with those programs, the recidivism rate exceeds 65 percent.
There has to be a new approach to countering radicalization – on this
point the experts agree. It is the methodology that generates concern. Law
enforcement and counterterrorism agencies are responsible for protecting
us, not coddling criminals.
We cannot wait for the right radicalization rehab program to come along.
One of the more successful counter terrorism programs has come under
attack is the use of undercover agents to infiltrate terrorist
conspiracies. Groups like the ACLU and the Council on American-Islamic
Relations (CAIR) have criticized it as "entrapment." This
position is simply wrong.
At some point it becomes necessary for authorities to intervene before
the planned
attacks are carried out. Providing an opportunity for someone
predisposed to commit a crime is not entrapment.
While social programs may be designed to compete for the same young,
impressionable minds and counter the allure that experienced Islamic
extremist groups utilized in recruitment, we must insist that authorities
not back away from their primary responsibility in the fight against terrorism.
It is a war, and it will not be over until groups like ISIS and al-Qaida
are taken out.
Simply placing an ad in the newspaper will not make them go away.
IPT Senior Fellow Patrick Dunleavy is the former Deputy Inspector
General for New York State Department of Corrections and author of The Fertile Soil of Jihad. He currently
teaches a class on terrorism for the United States Military Special Operations
School.
|
The IPT accepts no funding from
outside the United States, or from any governmental agency or political or
religious institutions. Your support of The Investigative Project on
Terrorism is critical in winning a battle we cannot afford to lose. All
donations are tax-deductible. Click here to donate online. The
Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation is a recognized 501(c)3
organization.
202-363-8602
- main
202-966-5191
- fax
|
|
Print
Send
Comment
RSS
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment