from NY to Israel Sultan Reveals
The Stories Behind the News

Posted: 27 Aug 2009 07:42 PM PDT

When Senator Ted Kennedy was first diagnosed with a brain
tumor, I wrote a piece titled, "No
Tears for Ted", now with the media awash in salty tears for the
departed Ted Kennedy, I can only reaffirm what I wrote then, "Still, No
Tears for Ted."

Ted Kennedy was no great statesman. Like his brothers, he was
the product of privilege and born to power. Unlike his brothers, he could
not even be bothered to maintain the charade of the statesman. If JFK and
RFK could pose for Dorian Gray portraits, flashing sunny smiles,
delivering impressive sounding speeches and maintaining the appearances
that covered up the underlying Kennedy corruption, Ted Kennedy didn't
bother much. Or need to.

The Kennedy family were the closest
thing America had to royalty, and like many of the younger brothers of
kings, Ted Kennedy felt free to wallow in his disgusting appetites, to do
his worst, confident that the memory of his martyred brothers would serve
as a shield for his worst excesses and crimes. And the worst thing about
it all, was that he was right. The tearful eulogies, the heaped baskets of
praise and the shameless use of his death as a political rallying cry
demonstrates one ugly thing, that for self-proclaimed royalty there are
neither morals nor law. La roi est mort. Now is the cue to shed your
tears.

Ted Kennedy outlived not only John F. Kennedy, but his son
as well. He outlived scandal after scandal. He outlived his own relevance.
And now he is to be buried with the honors fit for a great leader. A
foreigner passing by might wonder, has America lost another Lincoln or
another Roosevelt, no it has only lost another Kennedy, and we
unfortunately have no shortage of those.

The worst crime of the
Kennedy family was not in their almost supernatural corruption, or a past
rife with bootlegging and Nazi sympathizing... but in their dogged
determination to imprint themselves as mythical figures across the face of
American history. Not because of anything they did, but by transforming
the name Kennedy itself into a brand, crossing it with Camelot, to create
the illusion of nobility where there was none, and the myth of a great era
cut short.

The myth of the Kennedy family is completely
disconnected from reality. What if anything have they done to merit that
myth, besides dying tragically before their time? The short answer is
nothing. JFK was considered a disaster while in office. That side of his
presidency is a legacy mainly left at the feet of LBJ, because he lived,
while John Kennedy did not. Both brothers left behind a legacy of nepotism
mixed with hearty dollops of voter fraud, racism, not to mention two areas
that liberals would go on to fervently hate, Vietnam and McCarthyism. But
the Kennedy myth applied rose colored glasses so that the brothers are not
remembered for anything they actually did, so much as for a phrase or two
from their speeches, and the tragic myth of a new generation's dream cut
short by assassin's bullets.

Obama would self-consciously lift Kennedy's tactics, from the
Chicago voter fraud that arguably made JFK America's second illegal
President (after Hayes, Obama would be the third), to more importantly the
style over substance approach that enabled Kennedy to triumph by
connecting with a clueless youth vote. But it was the Kennedy family that
made the mold, that created a brand that became myth. A myth they could
not have originally intended, but one that had very effectively served Ted
Kennedy's ugly career.

Ted Kennedy is dead now, as is John and
Robert, but the power of the Kennedy myth lives on. That same myth nearly
moved John's completely unqualified daughter into a Senate seat, purely on
the strength of her name. That name is what made Ted Kennedy famous. It is
what let him leave a drowning girl to die, change into an outfit and spend
time chatting with his lawyers, while her corpse rotted in the lake. Any
ordinary man after that would have spent a term in prison, followed by a
quiet career of drinking and panhandling. His own death would not have
been accompanied by a farewell tour. Any ordinary man, not a
Kennedy.

Any Senator who repeatedly experienced bouts of public
drunkenness, once nearly running over a policewoman, would have been out
of office. But not a Kennedy. Any Senator who tried to collaborate with
the KGB on influencing an American election, would have been condemned as
a traitor. Never a Kennedy though. And that is the problem.

After
nearly eight decades, Ted Kennedy has finally passed on, and while he
missed dying before his time, his death is somehow being treated as tragic
after all. Perishing in his late seventies, Ted Kennedy more than twice
outlived Mary Jo Kopechne, who died in his car at only 29. Somehow that
isn't fair. And all the fuss, the pomp and ceremony, and the tearful
eulogies over his dead body.. cannot help but remind me of the girl he
killed whose death was attended by no one. Now Ted Kennedy belongs to the
ages, and Mary Jo Kopechne is a footnote in his life. His life, not
hers.

When Cain slew Abel, G-d placed a mark upon him, the Mark of
Cain, so that all would know him when they see him. Today we do not see
the Mark of Cain anymore, or hear the cry of the murdered. We place our
Cains in great coffins heaped with roses. We weep over them. We worship
them. And even those who know better, bow our heads and let the funeral
train pass. To hell with that. If you want to weep for someone, weep for a
woman drowning inside a car, not for the man who lived to a ripe old age,
and died surrounded by friends and family, with all the honor of the land
at his feet. In our time, there is no shortage of those who weep for the
Cains, whether they are Kennedy's or Al Queda's. Let us turn from the Mark
of Cain and remember the Abels instead.