http://www.resonoelusono.com/Imminent.htm
A New Global War Is Imminent
(Based on common knowledge and common sense only)
By Alexander Gofen
"So long as there is this accursed book [Koran], there will be no peace in the world."
William Ewart Gladstone (1809-1898)
1. Materialistic basis. Economical and military reasons.
1.1. Unsolvable global economical conflict: world resources of crude oil
1.2. Superiority on one side: enough for triggering a war ("diplomacy by other means")
1.3. Proliferation of nuclear weapons into Islamic world: Pakistan, Iran.
1.4. Enemy reinvestment into the West
2. Social/spiritual catastrophe in Eurabia and the Western world.
2.1. Islam as a "peaceful" invader
2.2. Impossible social programs and benefits
2.3. Westerners entering into a "Post-Christian" epoch
2.4. Christianity on the run - even in its homelands.
2.5. Unwillingness to procreate
3. The psychological reasons of our enemies
3.1. Unprecedented influx of money into the Middle East ("unearned capital"[5])
3.2. Perceived weakness of the West
3.3. Impossibility of insulation from the Western influences
4. Other big players
4.1. Hostile Russia
4.2. Indifferent (and Hostile) China
4.3. India in between
4.4. Israel as a trigger and a pariah: approaching an apocalyptic war.
5. The low intensity wars already in progress.
6. Unusually long "Peaceful" period.
7. Prediction of Sir Winston Churchill made in 1899!
8. The most spiritual reason for the war
1. First - materialistic basis. Economical and military reasons.
1.1. Unsolvable global economical conflict: world resources of crude oil mostly under the Middle Eastern Islamic (and some Socialist) countries.
The Western world depends not only on energy generated at power plants. It more so depends on liquid fuel for cars and air transportation. In order to substitute this liquid fuel, a breakthrough in physics, a new type of battery is required, whose convenience and energy density could compare with that in oil products. This is so far beyond the scientific horizon, that it is not likely to happen in foreseeable future (the energy density in the best of batteries is about 100 times lower than in gasoline). Thus the entire world is pumping trillions into the Middle Eastern countries: in an estimate by Hugh Fitzgerald, some 11-12 trillion since 1973 alone that the Muslim states of OPEC have received. Indeed, they dictate the oil prices keeping the whole world economy as a hostage.
Transferring to ethanol fuels (manufactured from coal, natural gas) suggested by Dr. Robert Zubrin requires years, and it can compete with oil only at prices above $50 per barrel - still a lot of revenues for the enemy. "We are financing a war against ourselves, and the way things are going, we will soon be paying the enemy more than we are paying our own military", - Dr. Zubrin says. Only victorious war against the Middle Eastern countries can eliminate the permanent threat of the oil blackmail emanating from them. In previous epochs, such blackmail alone would be a more than sufficient reason for triggering a full scale war.
And vice versa, in previous epochs it was understood, that not every trade with the neighbors is necessarily good, especially with those who are potential enemies. Buying huge amounts of the necessary resources from your enemy hugely empowers the enemy. Such a giant transfer of wealth enables the enemy to better arm itself and wage its wars more successfully.
1.2. In the past even a small superiority on one side was enough for triggering a war ("diplomacy by other means"). Nowadays the military superiority of the West over Islamic world is so immense, that it guarantees complete or selective annihilation of the Islamic enemy (if it were the goal) without any losses on our side. An imbalance of forces of such a magnitude has never existed before, and it can not last forever.
However the West has not enough power to occupy, pacify, and rebuild the Islamic world (as America did to the defeated enemies after the W.W.II). The West can not afford this paradigm of a humane war, when the victor must fully reconstruct the devastated enemy and establish freedom and democracy in that nation. A former Soviet dissident A. Shcharanski (now a minister in Israel) believed as though there is no nation in the world, which does not aspire to freedom. President G.W. Bush too believed that achieving freedom and prosperity in the currently hostile nations would greatly contribute to our security. This utopian thinking still dominates among the elite, and paralyzes the will to our survival.
Also a full scale war is being postponed now due to unusual atmosphere of self deprecation, defeatism, and Marxism consuming the West, coinciding with several other reasons analyzed below. Yet the postponing will make this war only more terrible, when it finally explodes.
1.3. Proliferation of nuclear weapons into Islamic world: Pakistan, Iran. Who's next? The Pakistani ruler nearly escaped several assassinations. He is so weak, that the peripheral regions of the country are out of control, nesting Taliban, Al Qaida, and perhaps Bin Laden himself. Yet Pakistan is considered our ally in the war on "terror" (a euphemism for Islam): therefore it can not be invaded. To "undo" the proliferation and to rid of Al Qaida there is possible only if a full scale war emerges.
1.4. Enemy reinvestment into the West. An unprecedented influx of oil money into Saudi Arabia and the Middle Eastern Islamic countries (see 1.1, 3.1) made possible their penetration into economies of the USA and other Western countries at unprecedented scale. They use their sudden financial power to feed not only terrorist Islam, but so called "legal" Islam[1] as well: both aiming to destroy the Western world. They buy businesses, establish Islamic institutions, foundations, lobbies and front groups (like CAIR) in entire Western world. They parasitize on its openness and political correctness. Best lawyers from ACLU (sometimes Jewish) help them (even pro bono) in undermining the law. Only a full scale war can give the Western countries a chance to undo this deadly economical and political grip.
2. Social/spiritual catastrophe in Eurabia and the Western world.
2.1. Islam as a "peaceful" invader, invited by the hosts, already comprises up to 10% of population in some Western European locations. It is unprecedented in human history influx of hostile aliens (piranhas), who do not want to assimilate and will never do. They are external enemies delivered into hosts' home and turned into the internal enemies. Therefore necessity to expel at least 30 millions of these invaders is inevitable. So far it seems an absolute taboo in democratic societies. Only under conditions of war this dilemma perhaps may be resolved.
2.2. Impossible social programs and benefits, low intensity work, socialism, and welfare (from cradle to grave) absolutely spoiled the countries of Western Europe. Their lowering birthrate adds to the impossibility to ever fulfill these programs. (Islamic immigrants do multiply, but they are rather clients of welfare). Indeed, no voluntary "undo" of entitlements is ever possible in any "democratic" society, unless a war emerges.
2.3. Westerners entering into a "Post-Christian" epoch are running on remains of the spiritual traditions of the past[2]: remains diminishing with every new generation. As a result, Westerners reject their own culture while bending back to the culture of aliens (multi-minus-own-culturalism). Lack of confidence, self-destructive trend of the elites infected with socialism, together with unprecedented growth of treasonous Left, consume the West. Only by enacting martial laws it may be possible to eliminate ill patterned culture and to shut down treasonous activities .
2.4. Christianity on the run - even in its homelands. For example, Catholicism, still the most numerous (over one billion) organized denomination of the world, calling itself The Holly Sea, voluntarily concedes the ground to unorganized arrogant Islamic "guests" even in its homelands in the old Europe. France, once a favorite daughter of the Church, or Spain, both known as traditional strongholds of Catholicism, became socialist atheistic nations competing in cowardice under pressure of Islamic front groups. Even Italy, the home of Vatican, follows the same way of defeatism and humiliation. The Pope hardly dares even to whisper anything critical about Islam. The head of Anglican Church Archbishop of Canterbury and the British Royals (historically bearing the title "Defenders of Christian Faith"!) turned into Islamic sympathizers. Archbishop of Canterbury actually welcomes sharia law! Jens Orback, Democracy Minister in Swedish government says: "We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us." (He took it for granted that the natives will become a minority in their own country (!) and that they have no right to oppose this - see 2.5 below). Such a voluntary betrayal of one's own faith and nation is unknown in the history.
In the United States, almost 100% Christian nation since its inception and still 90% Christian, churches are not yet empty. The freedom of religion (then understood as Christianity or Judaism only) was guaranteed by the Constitution. Yet under pressure of leftist propaganda, this fundamental right eroded, while a Soviet style doctrine of "separation" of Church and State took precedence (even not being a law on the books). This so called "separation" has reached its ugliest forms, and now it is being practically implemented as expulsion of Christianity from public arena (in public schools and universities completely!), while Islam has a pass. And what are the Christians doing? Still comprising a 90% majority, they behave like a beaten wife! They humbly dare to raise their voice asking only for "acceptance" and "not removal" of the religious symbols in their own country!
Only a war can wake up the patriotism and awareness about Christianity as the national identity in its home lands.
2.5. Unwillingness to procreate (substituted with willingness to fornicate) is another consequence of "Post-Christianity". The result is a lowering birth rate of native Europeans: about 1.5 vs. Islamic birth rate of 3-5 (2.1 being necessary for self sustaining). This alone amounts to national suicide in purely demographic way. In Canada and Australia the situation looks the same (in the US a little better). Again, no undo is possible unless a war emerges so that it shakes people's minds pushing them back to the traditional (Judeo-Christian) family values.
3. The psychological reasons of our enemies.
3.1. Unprecedented influx of oil money into the Middle Eastern countries ("unearned capital"[5]), especially into Saudi Arabia, during the 20th century suddenly returned them back from irrelevance, backwardness, and their traditional economy of camels and rugs. They perceive this unexpected wealth as a sign of Allah to renew their obsession with Jihad against infidels in the whole world. It recreated mass hysteria, religious fanaticism, global pan-Islamic expansionism, readiness to die for the cause, and to wage a war at any cost disregarding the (Earthly) outcome. And all that is happening in 1.2 billion Islamic part of the world, plus the growing Islamic sector of Western world. They strive toward the global war against infidels.
3.2. Perceived weakness of the West. Islamic countries interpret the civilized unwillingness of the Western world to engage in a global war as a sure sign of the weakness of the West multiplied by its decadence and lack of self-confidence. For them, the West is an enemy asking for invasion, ripped for being conquered and Islamized - a fatal confluence of sudden Islamic money with Senile Disorder of Left-wing Liberalism[3]. Islam simply cannot afford to miss an opportunity of such a war.
3.3. Impossibility of insulation from the Western influences in modern times (because of availability of Internet and mass media) drives Islamic world crazy. The West does not proselytize its values on purpose. However the information is freely flowing out, thus the Moslems perceive it as both threatening and ugly. It is threatening for them because electable governments, freedom of expression, equality and freedom of women undermine the very fundamentals of Islamic society. On the other hand, the contemporary "post-religious" West demonstrates such grotesque features as legalization, moreover promotion and protection (!) of sexual perversions; and sexual promiscuity and exhibitionism in general. It all is ugly, objectively ugly. Westerners at least realize that this filth comes in a package with something great too such as freedom, science, great art and entertainment. Unlike them, Moslems are indifferent to Rembrandt, Mozart, Einstein, or Beatles, perceiving the filth and ugliness alone. Therefore they will struggle to death for preserving their family values, so that their daughters never become sluts, nor do their sons embrace "alternative life styles" and "diversity".
4. Other big players
4.1. Hostile Russia. Formally Russia is endangered by the spread of Islam. However her traditional belief in her "own particular way" together with endemic hostility to the West, to the USA (and especially to Israel) makes siding with them out of the question. On the contrary, Russia tends to capitalize on the sky-high oil price and growing geopolitical tensions, earning on the trade with our Islamic enemies and providing them with modern arms.
4.2. China is not concerned with Islam at all. China would rather watch to see how to capitalize on the growing world conflict to its own advantage. China's growing economy and demand for oil inflate oil prices even more, meanwhile China's economical pressure on (and merger with) the US is being used as blackmail.
4.3. India is upset by Islam from without and within. It has fanatical islamic neighbors from both sides (Pakistan being nuclear), who incite her islamic minority and Kashmir separatists. However the Indian government is still too soft being perhaps under influence of islamic money.
Were Russia and China on the side of the West against Islam, the situation would be more definite and clear. Playing false deterrence games, they hamper decisiveness of the West (near zero anyway) to engage in a war for protection of the civilization. It will happen eventually, but will be more bloody.
4.4. Israel as a trigger and a pariah: approaching an apocalyptic war. From the year of its resurrection in 1948, Israel has been under attacks of Islamic neighbors as a forefront of the West in the Middle East. However the West is not known to care about its forefronts, always attempting to buy a peace - and getting a war later at a higher price (W. Churchill). That was, for example, how the West betrayed Poland and Baltic republics to Hitler and Stalin, and betrayed Czechoslovakia twice: first to Hitler, second to Soviets. And mind: unlike Israel, Czechoslovakia was a "regular member of the club".
In theory Israel for the West should be an ideal social and spiritual cause both. Socially Israel exemplifies the most just case of a successful national liberation movement (Zionism). Spiritually, God commanded to protect and bless Israel, whose destiny is crucial both in Judaism and Christianity. Yet neither socialists of this world see it this way; nor the Christians (except American Evangelicals and several other Zionist Christian denominations); nor even Israelis themselves (being affected with the same leftist senile disorder, as the rest of the West).
Islam is an existential threat for the entire West indeed. However the West is still big enough, unlike a tiny Israel. As a forefront of the fight in the middle of the enemies, not only is Israel the most vulnerable: her immediate existence is at stake. Yet Eurabia not only has never cared to extend any military help to Israel: Eurabia and its "intellectual" elite (including some Jews) have never hidden, that they prefer Israel to be defeated (to correct a "nasty mistake").
In the recent time when the global confrontation with Islam is getting sharper, Israel unintentionally acquired a role of a probable trigger in a much bigger conflict. However defeat of the Islamic enemies does not seem to be the primary goal of America and the West. America cares more that the war does not look as though motivated to protect interests of Israel (God forbid), nor that it really be a protection of Israel. Thus times and again Israel is being thrown to the wolves just to postpone the inevitable. And when this inevitable finally happens, it will become a prophetic war of an apocalyptic proportion.
5. The low intensity war (in Afghanistan and Iraq) is already happening right now, as well as numerous local wars of Islamic factions against non-Islamic neighbors. On a wider time scale, it is a 60 years long intermittent war of Islamic Middle East against Israel, and ultimately - a 1300 years long war of Islam vs. infidels.
6. Unusually long "Peaceful" period. The "relatively peaceful" (!) pause (after the World War II) is already longer than it used to be in the past: more than 60 years...
7. Prediction of Sir Winston Churchill made in 1899!
"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities - but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome." [4]
It is amazing, that Sir Winston recognized the Islamic threat when the British Empire shined in its highest power (the Sun never setting down over it), while Islamic world seemed moribund as it was when nobody had yet cared about their oil. What an irony it is, that Great Britain now exemplifies the highest level of dhimmitude and cowering to their insatiable Islamic piranhas.
8. The most spiritual reason for the war
The most spiritual event of the modern time (yet ignored by the contemporary political elites) is indeed the fact that in 1967 Jerusalem was finally liberated - as a result of the victorious 6 day war of Israel. That ought to be a seminal moment in the history of Judaism and Christianity: one of their main aspirations was fulfilled after several thousand years. Since 1967 it is no more an unattainable dream, whose realization is in the hands of God. Since 1967 the holiest city of Judaism and Christianity, particularly the Temple mount, finally belongs to Israel - and therefore to the sphere of influence of the entire Western (Christian) world. Since then the task of rebuilding of the Third Temple is exclusively in human's authority: like never before. Never ever before had the Judeo-Christian community of the world an opportunity to actually make an attainable decision in favor of the God's plan, i.e. to really build the Third Temple inviting the (re-)appearance of the Messiah.
Unfortunately Israeli government of 1967, and the Western (nominally Christian) powers of that time, and the contemporary governments of these countries all have been so afraid of provoking "Islamic rage" over the property that does not belong to the "land of Islam", that religious communities are prohibited to even think about moving the mosque from the top of the mountain elsewhere. Even prayers of Christians and Jews are prohibited on the Temple Mount - just to please the piranhas and postpone the war inevitable anyway. The defeatist governments are afraid to make a decision, which is completely within their reach. How long?
Summary. All these reasons do not help to forecast the exact date when the all-out war explodes: in several months, years or even decades. Some symptoms are happening right before our eyes, such as a strike in France (because of an attempt to cut welfare) and riots of "disillusioned" Moslem "youth", or a new turmoil in Pakistan. It is like an unstoppable planetary motion of tectonic plates, generating catastrophic earthquakes in unpredictable moments. Unpredictable - but imminent.
December, 2007
[4] "The River War" by Sir Winston Churchill, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-250, London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1899
(Added in 2009)[5]The Future of Western War, by Victor Davis Hanson, 2009
>>>>>
He quotes this excellent essay from Baron Bodissey from the Gates of Vienna, which I post below,
Tuesday, December 01, 2009
Surviving the Coming Crash
by Baron Bodissey
The noted blogger Fjordman is filing this report via Gates of Vienna.
For a complete Fjordman blogography, see The Fjordman Files. There is also a multi-index listing here.
As I have stated my essay The Coming Crash, I think we need to realize that the current ideological order is broken and beyond repair. There will probably some sort of pan-Western economic and social collapse in the not-too-distant future; I fear this is too late to avoid by now. The people who support the ruling paradigm are too powerful, and the paradigm itself contains so many flaws, that it cannot be fixed. It needs to crash. Instead of wasting time and energy on attempting to fix what cannot be fixed we need to prepare as best as we can for the coming crash and hopefully regroup to create a stronger and healthier culture afterward.
We are currently in the middle of the White Guilt Gold Rush. If you are a white Westerner you may not have fully realized this, but I can assure you that the rest of the world knows this. The trick is to keep the white man on the defensive and vaguely guilty at all times so that he can be squeezed for money. The climate quotas for carbon dioxide constitute a thinly disguised form of global Socialism through the UN-sponsored redistribution of wealth.The recent scientific scandal about fake data regarding man-made global warming is just the tip of the iceberg. There are currently so many different layers of lies from “gender equality” via IQ differences to climate that it is virtually impossible to deal with all of them. Our entire society has essentially become one big lie. Our media, our schools and our political leaders repeat these lies every single day; those daring to question them are immediately ostracized.
Since the EU has forced through the EU Constitution/Lisbon Treaty and in essence abolished not just popular influence on EU policies but dissolved dozens of nation states, the self-appointed European elites have in effect banned any legal opposition to their rule. It is no longer possible to formally oppose their policies within the regular political channels. Given that the same elites appear hell-bent on running the entire continent into the ground, this leaves the options of rebellion or a structural collapse. I don’t think we will see open rebellion just yet, although this could change if the economy deteriorates further. This means that the most likely way out now is a structural collapse, and I fear that’s exactly what we are going to get.
- - - - - - - - -
Didn’t the Obama Administration with international aid “save” the world from a looming financial crisis? Of course they didn’t. The main problem for the USA is that the national debt keeps rising while the national IQ keeps falling. This hasn’t changed one bit in the past year. On the contrary, it is worse now than it was before, and it looks like it will be worse still next year and the year after that. As long as this situation remains unchanged, my bet is that the price of gold will continue to rise as people seek safe harbor from the collapsing US dollar.
Although other industrialized countries have heavy debt loads, too, the case of the United States is especially serious because of its sheer size. Had the USA been a private person he would probably have been declared bankrupt a long time ago. But the United States is not a private person; it is still the world’s largest economy and has the world’s largest armed forces. As writer Takuan Seiyo states in the latest installment of his brilliant From Meccania to Atlantis series: “The strongest, most admired country in the world until just a few years ago is now a cautionary tale of the wages of sin and stupidity told to Chinese schoolchildren.”
I don’t know what the future holds for the USA. It could split apart along ethic and ideological lines in a Second American Civil War, or it could become just another Latin American country along with Canada, in which case all of America will be Latin America.
I could add that I don’t hate Latin America. If we do end up with a series of nasty Multicultural civil wars in Western Europe it is possible that some areas of South America could be better places to live than Birmingham or Marseilles. However, Latin America never has been and probably never will be a major force in world politics. If the United States declines this will shift global power back to Eurasia, where it has been throughout most of human history. China will in all likelihood be a leading player and perhaps the dominant one.
I am increasingly convinced that some of the developments we are witnessing are deliberate and that there is a long-term goal among certain powerful groups of breaking down Western nations to facilitate the creation of a global oligarchy. The lies we are being served are virtually identical in every single Western country. I’ve had discussions about this with my Chinese friend Ohmyrus who thinks this is caused by a structural flaw in our democratic system. I don’t necessarily disagree with that, but there are other forces at work here as well.
According to Herman Van Rompuy, the newly-installed President of the European Union, the climate conference in Copenhagen is a step towards the “global management” of our planet. As author Bat Ye’or has demonstrated and as I have confirmed in my own book Defeating Eurabia, the EU is actively collaborating with Islamic countries to rewrite the textbooks in European countries to make them more “Islam-friendly.”
It is well-documented that there are detailed long-term plans to expand the EU to include Muslim North Africa and the Middle East. This has been publicly confirmed by several high-ranking officials, including the British Foreign Minister in 2007. One newspaper leaked EU plans to import 50 million (!) more Africans to Europe in the coming decades, although urban communities across Western Europe are already in the process of breaking down due to mass immigration. A high-ranking official from Tony Blair’s Labour Government in Britain openly confirmed that they promoted mass immigration to import voters and alter the ethnic composition of the country. Similar policies are undoubtedly being promoted in countries from Germany to Australia.In June 2009, only a few years after a group of Arabs killed thousands of Americans in a Jihadist attack, former US President Bill Clinton told an Arab American audience that soon the USA will no longer have a majority of people with a European heritage. He believed that “this is a very positive thing.” It wasn’t that first time that Mr. Clinton expressed such views.
Jens Orback, Democracy Minister in the then Social Democratic Swedish government, during a radio debate stated that “We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.” He took it for granted that the natives will become a minority in their own country and that they have no right to oppose this.
I could add that Sweden has no colonial history. Neither have Finland or Norway, which gained their independence as late as the twentieth century, yet both countries are still force-fed mass immigration of alien peoples. The “colonial guilt” argument used against the natives in Britain, France and other Western European countries is bogus. The real issue is that we white Westerners should not have any countries to call our own. Our countries should be giant Multicultural theme parks for everybody else, financed by brainwashed white taxpayers.
Arguably the leading academic Multiculturalist in my country, Professor Thomas Hylland Eriksen of the University in Oslo, who has received millions in government funding for his projects, in an interview stated frankly that “The most important blank spot exists now in deconstructing the majority so thoroughly that it can never be called the majority again.” This is the ultimate goal of Western Multiculturalists. Make no mistake about it. Needless to say, this agenda is only pushed in white majority Western countries. All other countries are allowed to retain their demographic profile; only the West is required to commit suicide.
Law and order is rapidly breaking down in major cities across Western Europe, and indeed the Western world, as immigrant gangs rule the streets. The law is only upheld against the “racist” white majority population to ensure that they keep on paying ridiculously high taxes to authorities that do nothing but lie to them, insult them and aid their national destruction.
As the eminent English writer El Inglés says, “The nature and severity of the problems we face are now sufficiently clear for European patriots to start asking themselves what actions they and others like them will eventually be called upon to take when the failure of the state reaches a critical point, and what sort of battlefield they will be arrayed upon at that moment.”
One thing we absolutely need to do is to break the stranglehold that Marxist and Leftist groups have successfully established over the media and the education system in Western countries. These people need to be squashed. Maybe some readers think this sounds too harsh, but I firmly believe that we cannot deal effectively with our external enemies as long as our internal enemies control the information flow. We must reject those who promote a Globalist world, including multinational corporations that desire unlimited access to cheap labor.Imagine if you have a person jumping off a plane without a parachute because he is convinced that he has “moved beyond gravity.” If works for a little while, until it suddenly doesn’t. That sounds too crazy to be true until you realize that this is what the entire Western world is doing right now when we pretend that we have “moved beyond ethnic divisions.” It is hardwired into the human brain to look after your people and “tribe” first. The only ones who are not currently doing this are whites. If, or rather when, white Westerners start behaving like everybody else our countries will quickly become Balkanized nightmares of competing tribes.
We must switch from a “save the world” to a “save ourselves” mode. In the early twentieth century, people of European origins made up one third of the global population, maybe as much as 40%. In the not-too-distant future this figure will be down to less than 10% and falling. This sharp reduction has not been caused by a plague but by a massive population increase in Third World countries, ironically facilitated by the global technological civilization created by European advances. We have given alien peoples the technological ability to multiply, move to our countries and colonize us. This cannot be allowed to continue.
We must start looking after our own interests just like everybody else. Self-preservation is a natural instinct for all living things down to plants and bacteria. The first thing we must do is to bury the entire notion of “racism,” which is anti-scientific nonsense exclusively designed to intimidate whites. It is perfectly conceivable, indeed highly likely, that there is a major genetic component to culture. This would imply that the preservation of the European cultural heritage can only be accomplished through the preservation of our genetic heritage.
It is becoming more or less mandatory for teachers in many Western countries to disparage European peoples, their culture and their heritage. We don’t need to have special reeducation camps because the media and the education system ensure that our society is virtually one large reeducation camp. Unfortunately, that’s not much of an exaggeration. In Hollywood films such as the disaster movie 2012, which I had the misfortune of seeing, all whites are portrayed either as evil and selfish or as losers whereas the non-white characters are portrayed as selfless and heroic. In reality, whites are today among the most selfless and least ethnocentric groups on the planet, and we are being punished heavily for this trait.
The truth is that whites create superior societies. Not only are others not capable of creating what we do, most of them are not even capable of maintaining it. The one major exception would be Northeast Asians, the only other large group of people on this planet apart from Europeans capable of sustaining a technologically sophisticated society. If anybody replaces us as the world’s leading civilization it will be them, for the simple reason that they are the only ones who possess a genetic intelligence to match ours, and they are not suicidal.
Because we create attractive societies other peoples want to move to our countries, but in displacing us they will gradually destroy what made our countries desirable places to live in the first place. They both hate and secretly envy us, and our children suffer needlessly from the violence and verbal abuse caused by this. If whites put up a colony on the planet Mars, I am sure others would hitchhike there on our space ships and demand that we let them in. Once there they would not exhibit any trace of gratitude. On the contrary, they would constantly whine and complain about how evil and racist and oppressive the white man is.Muslims would demand respect because we owe all our scientific and technological advances to medieval Muslim scholars and because the Martian colony is the 63rd holiest place in Islam. In case you thought the latter sentence was intended as a joke, think again. In 1997 three Arab Muslim gentlemen from the Yemen sued NASA for trespassing on Mars, which they claimed that they owned because they inherited the planet from their ancestors 3,000 years ago.
Novelist Virginia Woolf famously wrote that women need “a room of their own.” In the twenty-first century it is whites who need a room of our own, and if we cannot have that in Europe, which is our cradle, then I don’t see where else we can have it. The alternative is that we maintain a continuing cycle where whites create dynamic societies that are overrun by people incapable of sustaining them. This cycle will finally end when the existence of white communities itself ends. The only viable long-term solution to this dilemma is physical separation. If you force very different peoples to share the same geographic space, conflict is inevitable. This insight was once considered common sense. Now it’s “hate speech.”
Will such a policy not be denounced as “hate” and “Fascism”? Possibly, but I don’t see why we should care about that. We, too, have a right to shape our destiny. Besides, we could always use the arguments of our critics against them. If whites truly are uniquely evil and oppressive, as some people seem to think, is it then not an act of mercy to keep non-whites away from us? That way they don’t have to become exposed to our racism, our hatred and our Islamophobia, but can retain their diverse, authentic and colorful tribal violence undisturbed.
One change that could conceivably take place is that people of European origins develop a stronger identity as “whites” on top of their national identities. I tried to explain to a hostile and now luckily discredited American blogger a while ago that the term “white nationalist” is meaningless in a European context. Maybe it carries some meaning in North America or Australia where most whites are of a mixed heritage, but over here it does not. Englishmen and Germans look fairly similar, but that hasn’t prevented them from slaughtering each other by the millions. Ditto for the French and the Spanish, the Poles and the Russians etc.
I don’t know if there ever will be a “white” identity. Perhaps we are just too different. What I do know is that if such an identity ever comes into being it will to a large extent have been created and forced upon us by our enemies. I have watched a number of disturbing videos, filmed by the attackers, of gangs of blacks or Arabs attacking what appears to be completely random whites. This happens from Sweden via Germany, Britain and France to the United States. This escalating wave of anti-white violence is one of the least-reported major news stories today as Western mainstream media almost uniformly try to cover these things up.
What strikes my about these attacks is that they are based on skin color; nobody asks the victims whether they are Russian Orthodox, Polish Catholics, English atheists, German Lutherans or Dutch Calvinists. These distinctions matter a great deal to us — we have fought many bloody wars because of them — yet they do not seem to matter to those who hate us. If people feel that they are attacked as whites they may start defending themselves as such, too.
The coming pan-Western crash will at the very least lead to an ideological-political paradigm shift and the rise of a new mythology to replace the post-WWII “suicide paradigm” of misunderstood anti-Nazism. At worst, the discontinuity will be so long and severe that what emerges on the other side will be a completely new civilization, the third generation of European civilization, just like what emerged during the Middle Ages was a different civilization from that of Greco-Roman Antiquity. The transition between the first and second generations of European civilization took centuries. History generally moves faster now than it did back then, but I suspect such a transition will nevertheless take several generations.
How a new civilization would look like I do not know. Medieval Europeans used different elements of the Greco-Roman legacy creatively and added new innovations on top of this. Generation Two of European civilization contained within itself aspects of Generation One, but also contained elements of sharp discontinuity. This will probably be the case next time, too.
All of this does admittedly sound a bit gloomy, yet I truthfully remain convinced that we have the necessary cultural and genetic resources to regroup and regenerate at some point, although it is conceivable that whites will in the future come from fewer bloodlines than we do today.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment