Thursday, April 8, 2010

from NY to Israel Sultan Reveals The Stories Behind the News














from NY to Israel Sultan Reveals
The Stories Behind the News


Link to Sultan Knish








Karzai's Gambit and Obama's Betrayal


Posted: 07 Apr 2010 07:54 PM PDT


Whatever else Hamid Karzai may be, he's always been a survivor.
And now he's trying to survive the Obama Administration. Karzai knows that
unlike Bush, Obama has no commitment whatsoever to Afghanistan. What Obama
wants is to pull out as quickly as possible in time for his own 2012
election. And he wants to do it without the appearance of a disaster and a
defeat. And there's only one way to do that, cut a deal with the
Taliban.



To that end the Obama Administration is operating on two
tracks. Track 1, the public and visible track, is the military
approach that Obama got pushed into, a temporary surge to push back the
Taliban and allow him to declare victory ahead of a pullout. Meanwhile
behind the scenes Track 2, the invisible diplomatic track, is meant to
sideline Karzai with a coalition of pragmatic "moderate" Taliban, who will
end the fighting and provide an appearance of normalcy for the pullout to
come.

The surge was supposed to be a show of force, to force them
to the table, but the real gambit was to put the Taliban back in
power.

For Obama, Afghanistan is a threat to his political
neck. For Karzai, it's a threat to his actual neck, and Karzai is a
survivor. And so he in turn began sabotaging Obama's Track 2. If the Obama
Administration wanted a show of force and some high profile prisoners, he
helped give it to them, by routing Pakistan's capture of top Taliban
leaders who were willing to negotiate with the US. Meanwhile Karzai was
using Pakistan's ISI, which had helped fund the Taliban, to conduct his
own talks with them. The resulting situation is one in which both Karzai
and the Obama Administration are competing to cut a deal with the
Taliban-- even as they're fighting them.

This disaster was brought
to you courtesy of the Obama Administration, which demonstrated its
absolute disregard for the future of Afghanistan and tried to cut Karzai
out of the loop in order to make a deal with the Taliban. Karzai's
response, within the context of the Afghani system, is completely
unsurprising. A successful US deal with the Taliban would mean that Karzai
is on his own. And so Karzai rushed ahead to double cross us
first.

With both the US and the "legitimate" Afghani government
courting Taliban factions, the chaos has grown incrementally, with
internal betrayals by the Taliban and the collaboration of ISI yielding
spectacular captures. This has led to some short term successes, but the
real problems are only growing.

Both Karzai and the Obama
Administration now essentially agree that the Taliban will take over
again, the disagreement is who will cut the deal and on whose terms it
will happen. Karzai wants to stay in power and maintain a stable coalition
with his own warlords. Obama wants a problem-free pullout, with no video
of US helicopters abandoning pleading crowds in Kabul. But whichever of
them gets their way, the pleading crowds will still be there, because the
people we promised to liberate have been sold out instead.

Neither Obama nor Karzai care very much
about what will happen to the girls' schools we set up, to the women
escaping their husbands, to the translators who worked with us, and all
those who really believed that we were bringing a new day with us. Some of
these will get visas to come to the United States. A few will even get
invites to the White House for a convenient photo op, so long as they keep
their mouths shut. The rest will be back under Taliban rule, because a
deal might be cut to let Obama wave his "Mission Accomplished" flag, or
one to let Karzai maintain a coalition, but the day to day Islamic law
will be back either way.

Worse yet Afghanistan's future will send a
message once again that no one should put their faith in the US. That any
liberation that comes will be strictly temporary and then the people we
drove out will be back. And that means the next time we come after the
Taliban or terrorists anywhere else, allies will be much harder to come
by.

The lesson we've taught is that not only will we negotiate
with terrorists, but we'll sell out those who helped us and replace them
with the very people who were killing us. We did it in Iraq not too long
ago. So it's no surprise that we're set to do it again in Afghanistan.
Karzai knows it too, so unsurprisingly he's threatening to join the
Taliban. And why not. If we reserve our best rewards for our worst
enemies, then it pays more to be our enemy than our friend.

Don't
believe me? Just ask Israel, which has spent the last two decades being
blamed for every Muslim terrorist attack and hostility toward America by
Muslim regimes. Just ask Taiwan which stood by the US while the Communist
Chinese were sending battalions into Korea. Or would have if we hadn't
done our best to keep our distance even then. Just ask Columbia, which
stood by us, only to face an administration eager to take its showers with
Chavez. Just ask England which fought with us in Afghanistan and Iraq,
only to be shown the bottom of Obama's shoe. Why would Karzai or anyone
else want to be the New Israel, berated, belittled and sold out at every
turn. Much better to be the Taliban. Much better to bomb Allied convoys
and then demand cash and concessions to stop.



Karzai is a survivor, if nothing else, and he knows exactly
what he can expect from Obama. Both men are products of similar
environments and cultures, but Karzai is a professional at the game, while
Obama is an amateur. Obama has the power, but Karzai is demonstrating that
he still has the leverage. If Obama wants to hug a Taliban, Karzai will
not only become the Taliban, but become a bigger threat than the Taliban.
If Obama wants to cut a deal with the Taliban, he will have to make a deal
with Karzai first, and deal with the Taliban through him. That's something
the bright foreign policy boys in foggy bottom still don't understand,
because while they were getting their oxfords polished, their opposite
numbers in Afghanistan were slogging rocket launchers through the mud and
cutting each other's throats in the dark.

Under the Bush
Administration, Afghanistan was meant to demonstrate that we could take
the darkest Islamist corner of the world and bring light to it. Obama
instead is demonstrating the brand of Realpolitik that will end any such
hope in order to score some political points before his own election. And
so another dream dies in betrayal and lies.










No comments:

Post a Comment