#1328: "No Longer Banned in the British Library" – NRO blog

Homepage    |     Articles    |     Blog

You can follow Daniel Pipes and the Middle East Forum on their Facebook and Twitter pages.

Please take a moment to visit and log in at the subscriber area, and submit your city & country location. We will use this information in future to invite you to any events that we organize in your area. No Longer Banned in the British Library! by Daniel Pipes Apr 9, 2014 Cross-posted from National Review Online, The Corner http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2014/04/no-longer-banned-in-the-british-library Print Send Comment RSS Share: Be the first of your friends to like this. The British Library, I documented yesterday, had blocked my website and those of the Middle East Forum while letting through some of the most foul antisemitic and Islamist sites. The article ended with mention of my writing to the library, a government institution, to request that the blocks be removed. Also, a substantial number of readers wrote to the library in protest. The British Library's reading room. As a result, I am happy to report, the blocks have been removed. A representative of the library's Electronic Services wrote me: Apologies for the fact that the websites you listed below were blocked by the Library's WiFi service. … I am writing to inform you that all sites listed are now available via the Library's WiFi. The library's press office (@BLpressoffice) announced the end of the block on Twitter. @DanielPipes re. your websites being blocked erroneously by @britishlibrary wifi: these have now been unblocked. Apologies for the mistake. The British Library press office tweet. So, the library owned up to its mistake and corrected it expeditiously. I am pleased and reassured by this response. But its replies raise deeper questions: Why did it take a library patron trying to access DanielPipes.org to learn about this problem? How could a major British governmental agency block these high-quality mainstream, informational, sites? How could it simultaneously give access to extremist, antisemitic, radical, Islamist, and jihadi websites? The library informs me that it relies on an automated filtering software made by a company called Smoothwall; it adds that it is "unable to advise [me] on the details of the algorithm" which Smoothwall utilizes for deciding which sites to block. But that does not suffice. Even if unintended, this pattern of banning the friend and letting in the enemy sends a powerful and distressing signal. I therefore pursued this matter with further questions: Asking the British Library about policy: How do you define intolerance? Now that you know that jihadi sites can be accessed on your WiFi system, will you continue to allow access to them? Asking Smoothwall about algorithms: Do you plan to make changes to the software that blocks DanielPipes.org and MEForum.org but permits Al-Qaeda's operational website? I will report on these exchanges when they are concluded. (April 9, 2014) Related Topics:  Daniel Pipes autobiographical, Muslims in the United States This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.

To subscribe to this list, go to http://www.danielpipes.org/list_subscribe.php Sign up for related (but non-duplicating) e-mail services:    Middle East Forum (articles and event reports)    Campus Watch (articles, blog posts)    Islamist Watch (articles, blog posts)    Legal Project (articles, blog posts) at http://www.danielpipes.org/list_subscribe.php DanielPipes.org