Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Islam: Is Integration Working? Part II of III


Gatestone Institute
Facebook  Twitter  RSS


In this mailing:

Islam: Is Integration Working? Part II of III

by Denis MacEoin  •  June 18, 2014 at 5:00 am
Some motives of the members of the British Law Society might stem from a desire to appease the Muslim community, rather than insisting on the basic democratic dictum that the law is indifferent to wealth, poverty, skin color, political belief or religious allegiance.
What seems unpardonable is that our Western governments and institutions, including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, are reinforcing these abuses.
Pressure to incorporate Shari'a law into broader legal systems is spreading beyond the UK.
Then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (L), Secretary-General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation [OIC] Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu (2nd L), Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu (3rd L) and EU High Representative Catherine Ashton (4th L) participate in the OIC conference on "Building on the Consensus" in Istanbul, Turkey, on July 15, 2011. (State Department photo)
Another apparent obstacle to integration seems to be the simple act, within circumscribed communities, of questioning. Questioning -- as well as free speech and free thought -- often seems to appear disrespectful and discouraged. A new effort to criminalize free speech internationally has in the past few years been promoted by, of all countries, the United States -- led by then Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton in three closed-door conferences between 2010 and 2012. Clinton not only dusted off -- but co-sponsored and actively promoted -- the all-but-dead Pakistani resolution from the United Nations Human Rights Council, Resolution 16/18, misleadingly named "Defamation of Religion." The resolution is, bluntly, an attempt legally to internationalize Islam's repressive "blasphemy laws." Anyone who might wish to question or discuss Islam can be accused of "blasphemy" and possibly sentenced to death. Since the beginning of Islam, anyone who might take steps to leave Islam can be accused of "apostasy," and sentenced to death. As Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi said at the end of January 2013, "If they [Muslims] had gotten rid of the apostasy punishment [death], Islam wouldn't exist today."

Iran: The Forced Murder Confession of Reyhaneh Jabbari

by Shadi Paveh  •  June 18, 2014 at 4:00 am
"I asked him what I could do to stop him from hurting my sister. He said, 'It is very simple Just sign that you bought the knife before the murder.' So I signed it and breathed a sigh of relief." — Reyhaneh Jabbari, letter from prison.
"One goal of the regime is to stop activists from campaigning: it brings unwanted attention to the serious human rights violations, especially now when the regime is trying to convince the world that the Islamic Republic is no longer a radical government." — Mina Ahadi, founder of the International Committee Against Executions.
Reyhaneh Jabbari in court.
Reyhaneh Jabbari, now 26, was sentenced to death for killing Morteza Sarbandi, a former Iranian intelligence officer. According to her letters from prison, however, during interrogations when she was 19, she was tortured until she confessed to murdering Sarbandi.
Jabbari has written from prison about the day of the attack, her interrogations, torture and the fate of other female prisoners:
As soon as I arrived at the Police Headquarters three large men were waiting for me in a small room. As soon as I entered, they handcuffed me to a chair and made me sit on the floor... They took turns screaming, "You think you are smart? People more important than you have been broken here. You insect, who do you think you are? Answer every question loudly...

To subscribe to the this mailing list, go to http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/list_subscribe.php

No comments:

Post a Comment