Outcome of Muslim Immigration to Britain: Rise in Terrorism
http://chersonandmolschky.com/2014/11/08/outcome-muslim-immigration-britain-rise-terrorism/
By: Rachel Molschky
Great Britain is a testament to what massive Muslim immigration can do to a Western nation. In only one week’s time, British authorities carried out 100 anti-terror operations. Poll results demonstrate that a large number of British Muslims wants Sharia law, does not identify as being British, and sympathizes with ISIS. Many are joining the terror group and returning to the UK, devising terror plots against the country which took them in and often pays them generous welfare benefits.
Furthermore, Muslims are overrepresented in the British prison system, where their portion of the prison population is more than three times their percentage of the overall population. Yet the EU and British politicians want more immigration, more refugees, more destruction of the nation which was once the great and mighty power of the British Empire.
Last month, it was reported that British authorities, according to Scotland Yard assistant commissioner Mark Rowley, have been carrying out “about 100 Syria-related preventative activities each week” and have been successful in thwarting several attack plots each year. They have made 218 arrests over the past 10 months and shut down 51,000 websites designed to recruit jihadists. This is averaging out now to about 1000 sites each week.
These are things which are not reported as front page news in the mainstream media. Instead, we hear about “Islamophobia” and supposed “hate sites” which merely provide the evidence that Islam is not a religion of peace but of violence. It is not a question of “Islamophobia,” and there is no analysis required- a quick glance at the numbers is enough to demonstrate that Islam is incompatible with the West, and the most assimilated Muslims are the most secular.
It is the doctrine of Islam that is used to attract Western Muslims to the violence because the religion itself is the excuse, giving permission to those attracted to the savagery to carry out their violent fantasies, in the name of Allah, who is supposed to be the G-d of Abraham, according to Islamic teachings! It all seems like something far more sinister, as Paul Wilkinson points out in “Is Islam a Satanic Cult?”
The end result is that the more religious a Muslim, the greater the tendency toward terrorism.
Political correctness calls for the use of the word “extremism,” but what is extremism if not taking something to the extreme? Therefore, unlike other religions, where the more pious one is, the more spiritual and the more peaceful, the doctrine of Islam requires violence. And so calling a Muslim terrorist an “extremist” is a nice way of saying that person is a religious Muslim who follows Islam “extremely” well.
They are following it extremely well in Britain now. Breitbart reports that British police are struggling to cope with the influx of immigration, of which Muslims make up a large part. The immigration has brought on an uphill battle for police to combat online pedophilia and terrorism, two areas where Muslim criminals dominate. While politicians want to bring in refugees to “help” them, the multicultural approach discourages integration, resulting in refugees and other Muslim immigrants forming their own separate societies, in a sense, bringing the old country to the new, or bringing the Middle East or Africa to Great Britain. Now the UK is plagued with people who profess a religion idolizing savagery.
Muhammad set the stage for Muslim immigration, as Y.K. Cherson explains in “The Goal of Muslim Immigration According to Muhammad’s Teachings.” Muslims today are following by example, and Britain is just one Western nation seeing the effects of that now. ISIS is only a catalyst to a process which had begun long ago with dhimmi politicians bringing about the gradual demise of their own country.
There is no need to blame Muslims, who follow their own religion, traditions and tribal tendencies, which is natural. Oil and water do not mix, and neither do Western and Muslim societies. We cannot transplant Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iraq or Somalia to the West and expect things to go smoothly. And now Britain is paying the price, as we all are.
Great Britain is a testament to what massive Muslim immigration can do to a Western nation. In only one week’s time, British authorities carried out 100 anti-terror operations. Poll results demonstrate that a large number of British Muslims wants Sharia law, does not identify as being British, and sympathizes with ISIS. Many are joining the terror group and returning to the UK, devising terror plots against the country which took them in and often pays them generous welfare benefits.
Furthermore, Muslims are overrepresented in the British prison system, where their portion of the prison population is more than three times their percentage of the overall population. Yet the EU and British politicians want more immigration, more refugees, more destruction of the nation which was once the great and mighty power of the British Empire.
Last month, it was reported that British authorities, according to Scotland Yard assistant commissioner Mark Rowley, have been carrying out “about 100 Syria-related preventative activities each week” and have been successful in thwarting several attack plots each year. They have made 218 arrests over the past 10 months and shut down 51,000 websites designed to recruit jihadists. This is averaging out now to about 1000 sites each week.
These are things which are not reported as front page news in the mainstream media. Instead, we hear about “Islamophobia” and supposed “hate sites” which merely provide the evidence that Islam is not a religion of peace but of violence. It is not a question of “Islamophobia,” and there is no analysis required- a quick glance at the numbers is enough to demonstrate that Islam is incompatible with the West, and the most assimilated Muslims are the most secular.
It is the doctrine of Islam that is used to attract Western Muslims to the violence because the religion itself is the excuse, giving permission to those attracted to the savagery to carry out their violent fantasies, in the name of Allah, who is supposed to be the G-d of Abraham, according to Islamic teachings! It all seems like something far more sinister, as Paul Wilkinson points out in “Is Islam a Satanic Cult?”
The end result is that the more religious a Muslim, the greater the tendency toward terrorism.
Political correctness calls for the use of the word “extremism,” but what is extremism if not taking something to the extreme? Therefore, unlike other religions, where the more pious one is, the more spiritual and the more peaceful, the doctrine of Islam requires violence. And so calling a Muslim terrorist an “extremist” is a nice way of saying that person is a religious Muslim who follows Islam “extremely” well.
They are following it extremely well in Britain now. Breitbart reports that British police are struggling to cope with the influx of immigration, of which Muslims make up a large part. The immigration has brought on an uphill battle for police to combat online pedophilia and terrorism, two areas where Muslim criminals dominate. While politicians want to bring in refugees to “help” them, the multicultural approach discourages integration, resulting in refugees and other Muslim immigrants forming their own separate societies, in a sense, bringing the old country to the new, or bringing the Middle East or Africa to Great Britain. Now the UK is plagued with people who profess a religion idolizing savagery.
Muhammad set the stage for Muslim immigration, as Y.K. Cherson explains in “The Goal of Muslim Immigration According to Muhammad’s Teachings.” Muslims today are following by example, and Britain is just one Western nation seeing the effects of that now. ISIS is only a catalyst to a process which had begun long ago with dhimmi politicians bringing about the gradual demise of their own country.
There is no need to blame Muslims, who follow their own religion, traditions and tribal tendencies, which is natural. Oil and water do not mix, and neither do Western and Muslim societies. We cannot transplant Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iraq or Somalia to the West and expect things to go smoothly. And now Britain is paying the price, as we all are.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment