Sunday, November 9, 2014

U.S. Military On BURIAL DUTY IN EBOLA W Africa:Military Families/Other Americans Endangered!What’s Going On? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

U.S. Military On BURIAL DUTY IN EBOLA W Africa:Military Families/Other Americans Endangered!What’s Going On? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

http://adinakutnicki.com/2014/11/09/u-s-military-on-burial-duty-in-ebola-w-africamilitary-familiesother-americans-endangeredwhats-going-on-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/

Grief-stricken: These photos, taken by photographers John Moore and Mohammed Elshamy, show the grim reality of the Ebola outbreak in Liberia, West Africa. Above, a woman crawls toward the body of her sister as an Ebola burial team takes it away for cremation
Distraught: The woman's sister, a market vendor, collapsed and died outside her home in Monrovia, Liberia,  while leaving to walk to a treatment center, according to her relatives. Above, the woman is seen grieving on the ground following the burial team's departure
FORGET about everything you think Obama’s monstrous regime is capable of, and up it exponentially by an explosive and deadly factor. And don’t wonder any longer why he thinks he can get away with whatever he has in store, even after he got bushwhacked at the mid-term elections. An “omnipotent” dictator.
MORE specifically, like a wounded animal, he is out for blood and the military is prime meat. And if you think this is smack talk, well, there is little one can do to convince on this end.
STILL, let us consider the fact that even qualified medical military personnel are not mandated to deal with infectious diseases. Their purview is treating wounded American soldiers during battle, and that is that. Not only that, but Ebola lands squarely within the specific mandate of WHO and all players recognize their primacy. In fact, any other health personnel who volunteer to deal with Ebola-infected regions are doing so under their own volition and this too is their choice! Undeniable.
UNFORTUNATELY, many who enter the military believe that orders are sacrosanct, even illegal ones. The fact of the matter is that it is entirely lawful to disobey illegal orders, and a renegade Commander-in-Chief tops the list. And no one should think that up and down the chain of command they are not starting to get “restless”. Consider:
This is one of the most interesting developments I think we have seen in all of the Obama Presidency. While there is no doubt that Obama has been quietly doing everything he can to take hold of as much power as possible, this has certainly not been actively explored by our wonderful “free” press and “independent” news media.
Now, we are even beginning to see a number of military generals begin to take an active stand against Obama and his policies. Many of these leaders feel very strongly that Obama has created a situation which could lead to the US being run by a ruler, rather than elected official. The first clue we had of Obama’s real intentions should have been the firing of General Petraeus when he decided to tell the truth about Obama under oath. Imagine that, an Obama Regime official who actually tells the truth when he gives testimony!
The situation has continued to deteriorate since then. Just listen to this report from the Conservative Tribune:
“Retired US Army Major General Paul E Vallely has been vocal about his belief that American liberty will only be restored through peaceful marches and protests to force the resignations of key political leaders, including President Obama. General Vallely has been joined by Air Force Brigadier General Charles Jones to create a ‘citizens council’ directly challenging the administration’s policy decisions. Obama’s treatment of Islamic terrorists, including his trade of several Guantanamo Bay detainees for accused deserter Bowe Bergdahl has drawn fire from two other retired generals, Air Force Major General Bentley Rayburn and four-star Army General Jack Keane.”
Although you will notice most of these folks are retired, there has also been at least one current, active duty general to respond to this call. That would be Marine General John Kelly. He has been very outspoken on Obama’s refusal to take care of the border crisis, saying it even threatens the existence of the US as a whole. Listen to this, from WND:
“Particularly in regards to the drug trade, murder rates and terrorist activity brewing in Central America, Kelly says, the waves of Latin Americans sweeping through Mexico and illegally into Texas presents a threat to the US every bit as serious as Iran or North Korea.’In comparison to other global threats, the near collapse of societies in this hemisphere with the associated drug and illegal immigrant flow are frequently viewed to be of low importance,’ Kelly said in an interview with Defense One. ‘Many argue these threats are not existential and do not challenge our national security. I disagree.’”
We should also point out the fact that our lovely commander in chief has also undertaken one of the most dramatic (although highly under reported thanks to his buddies in the mainstream media) purges the military has ever seen. This has included the firings of literally hundreds of high ranking officials, including dozens of generals, colonels, lieutenant colonels, majors, and other ranks. He has also insisted that current officials actually take an oath to him personally.
What do YOU think about all this? Should we take notice how more and more military generals are beginning to openly question, criticize, and call for drastic changes in Obama Regime policies? What do you think of the quotes given by these generals…and the formation of their citizens council?
MORE than rumblings….indeed, a commandant…as mentioned, a Dictator-in-Chief!  
ObamaMilitary
UNDER this paradigm, and with the understanding that his vile hatred for the U.S. military is boundless, it makes entire sense to send military personnel into an infectious death zone. Thereupon, they will be shipped back into America and spread the disease to their families (communities too), ostensibly for “treatment” and via a duty to treat America’s heroes! 
It has been said that you can not have a war with a disease. It is now confirmed that Obama’s “war” with Ebola in Africa puts the military in direct contact with the deadly virus.
Many have been saying that you can not have a war with Ebola. You can’t shoot it. You can’t drive over it with a tank. You can’t throw a grenade at it. It has also been speculated that Obama’s Ebola war is simply a move to appease a religion and put our soldiers in direct exposure with the disease. Essentially, the true goal could be to kill them off and potentially expose millions when they returned home.
Despite the warnings, President Obama declared “war” on Ebola and sent 4000 combat troops into the contaminated area. He then signed an executive order activating the ready reserves to fight Ebola.
What happens when the worst fears are no longer tin foil, but fact?
WND obtained a screen shot from an interview with the Under Secretary of the Department of Defense. In it, it confirms the potential of exposure to Department of Defense civilian and military troops, who will in fact have direct contact with Ebola victims!
Level3
While it appears that troops will not be directly in the hospitals treating the Ebola patients, their four-hour training will consist of their responsibilities in a “support role.” So what is that support role, you might ask?
The Washington Post indicates that the areas that are infected the most are having trouble disposing of dead bodies. This seems to be due to the fact that Muslim burials require the body be washed for burial by same-sex individuals, and they are having trouble getting the families of the deceased to understand how to dispose of the bodies without infecting more people.
And a combination of inadequate infrastructure, logistical issues, conflicts with Western health care workers and burial traditions has contributed to widespread difficulties in containing the spread of the disease among mourners and those caring for the dead.
The World Health Organization provides specific guidelines for how to safely transport and bury Ebola victims. They include instructions to “be aware of the [victim's] family’s cultural practices and religious beliefs,” and to “help the family understand why some practices cannot be done because they place the family or others at risk for exposure.” (The Washington Post)
So it seems that President Obama’s answer is to send US civilians and military troops into harms way to take care of a problem that should be dealt with by Africa and the Word Health Organization. We are training the people on the proper Muslim burial rituals, building a command center and burial sites, and providing training from the military personnel (who are not doctors or medical professionals and only receive 4 hours of training themselves) to individuals like the World Health Organization (who are supposed to be the trained medical professionals and doctors world-wide). We are also calling on US forces to bury the dead of another country and make sure we are “sensitive” to their “religious culture” for a group that daily chants death to America?
While shallow graves are part of the spread of the disease as the bodies are dug up by dogs and monkeys which are in turn eaten in their culture, it is not the US’s place to send combat troops into exposure to tell doctors how to handle political correctness if the culture does not like the fact that cremation is the only way to ensure the disease does not spread or to have troops wash dead bodies. While some Christians don’t believe in cremation, they are not likely to scream “Allah Akbar” and try to kill you if you let them know it is the only way.
Many veterans have seen this as a direct slap in the face to our armed forces with the potential to expose millions of American lives when they return home state side. One man I highly admire, U.S. Army Lt. Gen. William “Jerry” Boykin, who was commander of the US Special Forces, conducted an interview in which he shared similar concerns that this is potentially being used to slim down the troop ranks and kill Americans.
In exclusive interviews recently with WND, retired U.S. Army Lt. Gen. William “Jerry” Boykin and retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely condemned Obama’s decision to deploy troops to West Africa, arguing they could bring the virus to the United States or to other units.
The generals said the mission of U.S. troops is to fight wars, not disease.
The concern is that these soldiers, who will be exposed to the environment where the virus is prevalent, could bring it to the U.S. and potentially spread Ebola as they return home and are assigned to other units. (WND)
The two generals are absolutely correct.
The United State is now number one after Africa in Ebola exposure cases, yet our Commander-in-Chief continues to fly people in for treatment daily and won’t stop flights into our country from West Africa. He also appoints an Ebola Czar that thinks the number one problem in the US is over population and gives him the title Czar so it doesn’t have to go through congress, where even the lame duck session would have not appointed him.
The United States is already at war with the Islamic State and terrorist organizations that are actual enemy combatants. You can not “war” with disease. We have an actual enemy to use the “Military Hammer,” as President Obama so equivalently told West Point earlier this year, and adhering to our enemies is still the number one thing listed in Article III, Section 3, of the US Constitution as TREASON!
Where is the Provost Marshal of the Pentagon when he needs to do his job and fulfill his oath of enlistment? — ALL enemies, foreign and domestic.
_77180622_023540259-1
TO wit, the Commandant’s anti-American weapon of choice against military personnel, their families and America in toto is Ebola, and he has deployed its use effectively! America’s open borders are just another guaranteed entry point. 
Barack HUSSEIN Obama: a (human) parasite like few others. Deadly in the extreme!

No comments:

Post a Comment