"Did Swedes Just Decide for National Suicide?" - NRO, #1378

Homepage   |   Articles   |    Blog

Join Daniel Pipes on a trip to Israel's Negev desert, ​with side visits to explore​ the recent Gaza war. For more information, please click here. Dear Reader: (1) I appeared on Sun News' Arena with Michael Coren on Dec. 15 to discuss the siege in Sydney; it can be viewed here. (2) The deadline is approaching to sign up for the fact-finding expedition I will be leading in April-May, an in-depth study of the Negev desert, its role in Israeli life and, by extension, its connections to Egypt and Jordan. (Although our focus is on Bedouins and Israel's national security, the itinerary also takes us to historic, religious, and cultural sites, including Jerusalem's Temple Mount and the Dead Sea.) The size of the group will be limited to 25 people so that each participant will have individual attention from me and the tour organizers. If the trip tempts you, please consider taking these steps: 1. Review the details at http://neg.heritagestudyprograms.com/. Address any questions to the trip organizer, Roni Wexler at HSP613@gmail.com 2. Should you decide to join, go to http://www.gate1travel.com/hsppipes2015.aspx, fill out the form, and make a deposit. Again, for assistance with booking, write Roni Wexler at HSP613@gmail.com Yours sincerely, Daniel Pipes Did Swedes Just Decide for National Suicide? by Daniel Pipes National Review Online December 30, 2014 http://www.danielpipes.org/15329/sweden-national-suicide Share: Be the first of your friends to like this. N.B.: NRO title: "Sweden to Opt for Suicide by Immigration?" Woe to anyone in Sweden who dissents from the orthodox view that welcoming large numbers of indigent peoples from such countries as Iraq, Syria, and Somalia is anything but a fine and noble idea. Even to argue that permitting about 1 percent of the existing population to emigrate annually from an alien civilization renders one politically, socially, and even legally beyond the pale. (I know a journalist threatened with arrest for mild dissent on this issue.) To state that there exists a Swedish culture worth preserving meets with puzzlement. The Swedish government has opened the door to Syrian refugees. And yet, the realities of immigration are apparent for all to see: welfare dependency, violent bigotry against Christians and Jews, and a wide range of social pathologies from unemployment to politically-motivated rape. Accordingly, ever-increasing numbers of Swedes find themselves – despite known hazards – opting out of the consensus and worrying about their country's cultural suicide. The taboo on such attitudes means that political parties, with only one exception, staunchly support continued immigration. Only the Sweden Democrats (SD) offer an alternative: real efforts to integrate existing immigrants and a 90 percent decrease in future immigration. Despite an unsavory neo-fascist past (not something unique to it, by the way), SD has become increasingly respectable and has been rewarded with electoral success, doubling its parliamentary vote from 3 percent in 2006, to 6 percent in 2010, to 13 percent in 2014. All the Swedes with whom I spoke on a recent visit expect the SD vote to grow further, something recent polls confirm. If a party or bloc of parties held a large majority in Sweden's unicameral parliament, SD would be virtually irrelevant. But the Riksdag's two blocs are almost equally balanced. Three left-wing parties control 159 of 349 seats, while the "right-wing" (quotation marks to denote that, from an American perspective, it's hardly conservative) Alliance for Sweden, consisting of four parties, has 141 seats. This means that SD, with 49 seats, holds the balance of power. Sweden's Parliament House (Riksdagshuset) in Stockholm. But SD is deemed anathema, so no party bargains with it to pass legislation, not even indirectly through the media. Both Left and "Right" seek to isolate and discredit it. Nevertheless, SD has played kingmaker on certain crucial legislation, particularly the annual budget. In keeping with its policy to drive from power every government that refuses to reduce immigration, it brought down an Alliance for Sweden government in early 2014. Recent weeks saw a repeat of this scenario, when SD joined the Alliance in opposing the leftist budget, forcing the government to call for elections in March 2015. But then something remarkable occurred: the two major blocs compromised not only on the current budget, but also on future budgets and power-sharing all the way to 2022. The left and "right" alliances worked out trade-offs so that elections need not take place in March, allowing the Left to rule until 2018, with the "Right" possibly taking over from 2018 until 2022. Not only does this political cartel deprive SD of its pivotal role but, short of winning a majority of parliamentary seats in 2018, it has no meaningful legislative role for the next eight years, during which time the immigration issue is off the table. A graphic version of the two major parliamentary blocs' deal (the blue anemone hepatica flower is the Sweden Democrats' symbol). This is nothing short of astonishing: to stifle debate over the country's most contentious issue, 86 percent of the parliament joined forces to marginalize the 14 percent that disagrees. The two major blocs diluted their already tepid differences to exclude the insurgent, populist party. Mattias Karlsson, the acting SD leader accurately notes that with this deal, his party has become the only real opposition. In the long term, however, things look good for SD, which will likely gain from this undemocratic sleight of hand. Swedes, long accustomed to democracy, do not appreciate a backroom arrangement that almost surely nullifies their votes in 2018. They don't like its bullying quality. Nor do they take well to removing a highly controversial issue from consideration. And when the time comes to "throw the bums out," as always it does, the Sweden Democrats will offer the only alternative to the tired, fractious coalition that will have been in power for eight long years – during which time immigration problems will alarm yet more voters. In other words, this blatant act of suppression is spurring the very debate it is intended to quash. Before too long, the supreme issue of national suicide might actually be discussed. Mr. Pipes (DanielPipes.org, @DanielPipes) is president of the Middle East Forum. © 2014 by Daniel Pipes. All rights reserved. Related Topics:  Immigration, Muslims in Europe This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.

To subscribe to this list, go to http://www.danielpipes.org/list_subscribe.php Sign up for related (but non-duplicating) e-mail services:    Middle East Forum (articles and event reports)    Campus Watch (articles, blog posts)    Islamist Watch (articles, blog posts)    Legal Project (articles, blog posts) at http://www.danielpipes.org/list_subscribe.php DanielPipes.org