|
Steven Emerson,
Executive Director
|
June 2, 2015
|
|
Islamists
Use Boston Shooting to Sow Hatred of Law Enforcement
IPT News
June 2, 2015
|
|
Share:
|
Be the
first of your friends to like this.
A Boston
police officer and an FBI agent shot and killed a man Tuesday morning, saying he lunged
at them with a military style knife when they tried to question him.
Usaama Rahim reportedly was under surveillance by a Joint Terrorism Task
Force investigating his possible sympathies with Islamic State [ISIS]
terrorists. Despite a lack of verified information, social media lit up
almost immediately with claims that Rahim was merely waiting for a bus when
he was shot in the back, and was on the telephone with his father when he
was killed. The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) used its
Facebook page to promote a baseless theory that Rahim was gunned down in
cold blood, and the terror investigation is a fabrication to cover that up.
Authorities
"have added a national security component to divide and conquer the
movement," wrote Linda Sarsour, executive director of the Arab American
Association of New York, in a post republished by CAIR's national office.
"At the end of the day, a Black man was shot on a bus stop on his way
to work and we should treat this like any other case of police violence.
All we want is answers to our questions."
Sure, it's just asking questions. Does anyone whose understanding of
police investigation involves more than watching "Law &
Order" reruns expect answers to all questions in a police shooting to
be answered within six hours? The truth, it seems, is not what this reaction
is all about.
CAIR routinely uses scare tactics to fuel suspicion and paranoia among Muslim Americans
toward law enforcement. In 2011, one of its California offices used a cartoon of a shadowy FBI agent lurking outside
homes to urge Muslims to "Build a Wall of Resistance" and
"Don't Talk to the FBI."
The director of that same chapter, Zahra Billoo, posted a series of her own questions
about the Rahim shooting and retweeted others, including one which declared
Rahim's death "was murder – murder of a black Muslim man."
CNN cited law enforcement sources in reporting that Rahim "belonged to an ad hoc terror
network" and that police opened fire "after he waved a large
military-style knife at officers." Other reports indicated authorities
were concerned that Rahim was radicalized by ISIS social media and may have intended
to attack police.
The possibility that Rahim legitimately warranted law enforcement
attention was never considered in the flurry of social media posts aimed at
painting the officers involved as wanton murderers.
"I'm not
quick to believe the FBI's narrative about who was supposedly trying to
join [ISIS]," CAIR's Michigan director Dawud Walid wrote in a Facebook post. "I have no reason to believe them
in this case. However even if that was true, that doesn't justify excessive
force - the family states that he was shot in the back. Moreover, he was on
the phone with his dad as law enforcement approached him then fatally shot
him."
None of that may be true.
Walid then invokes the 2009 FBI shooting of radical Detroit Imam Luqman
Abdullah. Walid's campaign to cast that shooting as unjust endures,
despite videotaped evidence showing Abdullah refused to surrender as agents
moved in to arrest him. Independent investigations by the Justice Department and Michigan's Attorney General found that "Abdullah
was armed, resisted arrest, rejected repeated commands to surrender and
show his hands, and still refused to comply when warned that a [police K-9]
dog would be deployed."
During an afternoon news conference, Boston Police Commissioner William
B. Evans said police video from Tuesday's shooting shows Rahim repeatedly
moving aggressively toward the officers while brandishing the knife. This
continued as officers retreated and ordered him to drop the weapon. Rahim,
26, was shot in the torso and abdomen, Evans said.
Rahim was subject to surveillance for the past two years, Evans said.
Those skeptical voices don't have to believe any of that – and Evans's
career would be over the second it is proven he lied about the
confrontation in front of the national media.
That's not likely.
Even after the news conference, Walid claimed the police's version of
events "doesn't make sense" because police didn't approach Rahim
with an arrest warrant.
ISIS has attracted thousands of foreign fighters, including one prominent
member who was educated in Boston. On the same morning as the Rahim
shooting, it was reported that Ahmad Abousamra was killed in Iraq. He
graduated high school in a Boston suburb and graduated from the University
of Massachusetts Boston. He made the FBI's list of most wanted terrorists in 2013 for his
alleged role as a significant ISIS social media expert.
In the immediate fog of the shooting, however, an ISIS link was
unfathomable and the shooting was the "murder of a black Muslim
man."
Or, it could have been a confrontation only Rahim could have prevented.
He could have laid down his knife and surrendered, as Evans indicated
Tuesday afternoon. Until police release the video Evans mentioned, no one
knows for sure.
But if the commissioner's claims prove to be accurate, then the
immediate reaction to Rahim's death can only be seen as grossly irresponsible
and cynical. They drove a narrative made out of thin air and gossip, but
one that people will remember and believe no matter what evidence emerges.
CAIR may have realized its mistake – the Sarsour post was taken off the
organization's Facebook page Tuesday afternoon, but you can see it in full here.
After terror attacks – attempted and successful – Islamist groups are
quick to demand that the public not rush to judgment, especially about the
perpetrators' identity and motivations. They would do well to heed their
own admonitions when the situation is reversed.
Related Topics: , Usaama
Rahim, Joint
Terrorism Task Force, ISIS,
Linda
Sarsour, CAIR,
Dawud
Walid, Zahra
Billoo, social
media, Luqman
Abdullah, WIlliam
B. Evans, Ahmad
Abousamra
|
The IPT accepts no funding from
outside the United States, or from any governmental agency or political or
religious institutions. Your support of The Investigative Project on
Terrorism is critical in winning a battle we cannot afford to lose. All
donations are tax-deductible. Click here to donate online. The
Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation is a recognized 501(c)3
organization.
202-363-8602
- main
202-966-5191
- fax
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment