Deleted
Facebook Posts Jeopardize Major Dutch Terror Trial
by Abigail R. Esman
Special to IPT News
September 23, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Share:  
|
  Be the
first of your friends to like this.
 It is the largest
terror trial in the Netherlands since the murder of Theo van Gogh in 2004, and one of the largest in Europe
since the 9/11 attacks: ten Muslim extremists, all accused of being members
of a terrorist group and of recruiting others for jihad.
Now it may all be about to unravel, allowing eight of the accused to
walk free. The other two are believed dead, "martyred" in the
Islamic State.
The defendants in the case are accused of conducting secret meetings to discuss jihad
activities and of recruiting others via social media and in public. Some,
particularly Azzedine Choukoud, the network's alleged leader, and Rudolph
Holierhoek, are also accused of giving speeches and publishing statements
and articles online that praise ISIS and their jihad.
The trial has held challenges from the start. As one defense attorney
argued, much of the evidence crosses into questions of free speech. Can
praising a terrorist group constitute a criminal act? Is talking about a
desire to join ISIS actually a crime? Or are such comments protected under
laws of free expression? Where – and how – can lawmakers draw the line?
Others accuse police investigators of entrapment, arguing that a sham
Facebook account they created to lure ISIS fans to connect and share
pro-jihadist material went too far.
That account, created with the permission of the Dutch courts, was
managed by an unnamed agent in order to post videos and texts in Dutch and
Arabic, along with incendiary photos, under the pseudonym of "Aboe
Noewas." As a result, "Noewas" was invited to
"friend" ISIS recruiters and others from the network, including
Azzedine Choukoud (also known as Abou Moussa).Through such connections,
"Noewas" gained access to the private conversations shared among
the terror group's members and with their other Facebook friends.
But the agent behind the "Noewas" profile was specifically
directed only to accept "Friend" requests, not to initiate them.
Yet some evidence suggests that he ignored this restriction, soliciting
contacts directly. Moreover, the alleged terrorists seem to have shared
amongst each other a photograph and accompanying text originally posted by
"Noewas." If true, this could be viewed as entrapment.
These glitches have now forced Dutch officials to examine the
conversations and "shares," and provide evidence that the
comments left and materials shared and posted were neither planted nor
coerced. That should be easy enough: just call up the account.
Except that once the investigation ended, the account was closed down,
and in accordance with Facebook policy, all its activity deleted. While the
police saved copies of the suspects' comments, they failed to do the same
with "Noewas's" own posts.
Whoops.
This is no small matter. The nine men and one woman on trial reportedly form "the jihadist network of
the Netherlands," according to newspaper Algemeen Dagblad (AD).
They allegedly meet regularly in apartment building basements to plan
strategy and listen to lectures by other radicals and recruiters. Several
in the group participated in the violent anti-Semitic, pro-ISIS demonstrations in the
Schilderswijk neighborhood of The Hague during the restless summer of 2014.
Others have fought in Syria, where some were killed and a few are still
engaged. At least two have returned home, bringing with them the jihadist
training they received there.
With the delay in the trial, officials decided on Monday to release one
suspect, Rudolph Holierhoek, a Muslim convert and the son of a Dutch judge.
The 26-year-old redhead, known for his Internet savvy, has spent the past
year in the terrorist wing of a high-security prison in Vught.
In deciding to release him, the Volkskrant
reports, the courts took into consideration his "personal
situation" as a student and a father. He remains under watch, however,
and may not leave the country. He also must surrender his passport and stay
off of social media. Active in the past in many pro-ISIS and pro-jihadist
events, he is now banned from taking part in any public demonstrations.
Holierhoek will be required to attend the trial when it reconvenes,
presumably with the missing evidence recovered. But one has to wonder what
the situation would be had it never been lost to begin with.
Interestingly, after the vile murder of British Fusilier Lee Rigby in May 2013
by Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, two jihadists active on
Facebook, administrators at the social network promised to aid governments identify terrorist suspects
who used the site either to communicate or to spread jihadist propaganda.
Why they never reported any members of this particular Dutch group remains
unclear; but their commitment to prevent incidents like Lee Rigby's killing
and other terrorist attacks suggests that they may well have noted – and
kept – the materials posted by "Noewas," who was, after all,
posing as a terrorist himself.
In an email, a spokesman for Facebook in the region confirmed that
"content that is removed from Facebook is indeed completely removed
from Facebook" within a few weeks.
If law enforcement fails to request access within that time, "then
it simply can't be found," wrote Demaris Beems.
If Dutch officials are unable to retrieve the suspects' Facebook
exchanges, the outcome will extend beyond the frightening release of the
suspects: they've disclosed a key tool in monitoring and combating ISIS
recruits and have nothing to show for it. As a consequence, such exchanges
are likely to go further underground, making future investigations
significantly more difficult – and probably not only in the Netherlands.
All of which raises new arguments for those who support collecting and
preserving data – practices that have been under fire internationally since
the exposure of America's PRISM program by Edward Snowden in 2013. Yet just
as body cameras are now being used by U.S. police to monitor their activity
– particularly in cases of aggression against black suspects – such data
collection programs can also help protect innocent victims from overzealous
counter-terrorism teams who might otherwise plant material or coerce
suspects to say or do things that could be self-incriminating. On the other
hand, those same data collection programs can also provide precisely the
information and the evidence needed to convict the terrorists lurking in
our streets, plotting our destruction in the basements of our homes.
Time will tell what Facebook's records have been preserved, and what, if
anything, its officials decide to share with the Dutch prosecutor's office.
But the case itself confirms the importance of permitting such data to be
stored: it allows us all to know the truth. And in that, we are all made
safer.
Abigail R. Esman, the author, most recently, of Radical State: How Jihad Is Winning Over Democracy in
the West (Praeger, 2010), is a freelance writer based in New
York and the Netherlands.
|
Print
Send
Comment
RSS
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment