|
|
|
|
Steven Emerson,
Executive Director
|
March 7, 2016
|
How
Would You React to a Terror Attack?
by Paul Alster
Special to IPT News
March 7, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Share:  
|
 Be the
first of your friends to like this.
Have you ever
wondered how it feels to suddenly find yourself in the midst of a terror
attack, and how you would react? It's everyone's worst nightmare, but for a
growing number of people in Israel over the 5 ½ months since the latest
Palestinian uprising began, it has been a shocking reality.
Since Sept. 13, 32 Israelis and one Palestinian have been murdered, most
by Palestinian attackers. Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs counts "195 stabbings and attempted stabbing
attacks, 79 shootings, and 40 vehicular attacks" involving the ramming
of pedestrians. The attacks continue and the figures are updated almost
daily.
More than 170 Palestinians reportedly have been killed by Israeli
security forces or armed Israeli civilians during the same period, most
during or in the aftermath of a terror attack; the remainder in clashes at
violent demonstrations.
Apologists for the terrorists cite a perceived lack of hope and
opportunities for Palestinian youth, but a 17-year-old attacker killed by
Israeli security forces on Friday held a U.S. passport. This attempted attack provided
yet another apparent example of the deep-seated, institutional indoctrination of young
Palestinians considered to be a major part in their decision to attack
Israelis. Urged on by Palestinian state media that routinely glorifies
attackers, and lauded by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud
Abbas, who recently told the families of 11 terrorists "Your sons are
martyrs," the violence shows no sign of ending.
In October, Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat told citizens with licensed firearms to carry them at
all times as a response to the random killings. Last week, following the stabbing to death of unarmed 21-year-old off-duty
soldier Sgt. Tuvia Weissman in a West Bank supermarket, Israel Defense
Forces (IDF) Chief, Lt. Gen. Gadi Eisenkot reversed a previous directive and instructed all
off-duty soldiers and those traveling home on leave to carry their weapons
with them.
But even if a soldier has his weapon, how well equipped is he to react
to a sudden attack in the midst of chaotic scenes?
Last week, I was invited to an IDF base in the south of the country to
see new cutting edge technology, including tank and armored personnel
carrier simulators. In view of current events though, it was the hi-tech
simulators recreating potential terror scenarios that were of particular
interest.
"Some come to us for three or four-day courses, others come for
longer periods," the lieutenant in charge of training said. "The
courses are tremendously helpful to new soldiers and those who have trained
before and need to keep their shooting skills up-to date. We use a wide
variety of weapons including the M4 and Micro Tavor rifles. People develop
their skills for many different units within the army. This new technology
brings you as close to real situations as it is possible to get."
A simulated shooting range recreates both urban warfare and battlefield
conditions. Even crosswinds are added to train as realistically as
possible. Computer graphics show where each bullet went. Alongside the
instructor's guidance, it highlights when a soldier is aiming too high or
too low, if his stance is wrong, or even using his elbows incorrectly when
in a prone position, for example. After the range, the soldiers move on to
the terror attack simulator. I was invited to try it out alongside the
lieutenant. I was somewhat skeptical that it would come close to recreating
the feeling of a real, unprovoked attack.
|
Photos courtesy of the
IDF
|
Facing a cinema-style screen, I am a soldier waiting at a bus stop where
something may or may not happen. The images are filmed on location and are
uncannily realistic. A man walks towards me on screen and asks if I have a
cigarette. I felt like answering him. People are waiting close by for the
bus. A car approaches at speed, but it's just dropping someone off. I'm
prepared for the worst but he goes peacefully on his way. Then another car
pulls up and, without warning, a man wielding a large knife suddenly
charges in our direction after stabbing a passer-by. Even though I know
this is not real, I feel a surge of panic, take aim and fire a series of
shots. Unarmed civilians are close by.
The attacker soon falls to the ground. If he hadn't been hit, I am told,
he would have stabbed again. My heart is pounding. For me, unexpectedly,
the simulator vividly brought back to mind a real attack I endured 17 years
earlier. It went quite a long way toward recreating the utter shock and
split-second decision-making that can be the difference between life and
death when confronted with someone intent on ending your life.
The simulator's computer system recorded all that happened. 12 shots
were fired; 11 missed. There were no non-lethal hits, but there was one
lethal hit, and that was the one that killed the terrorist in this
instance. Clearly, I'm no sharp shooter. Trained soldiers would react
faster and with more accuracy, particularly after undergoing training.
The instructors note that no figures are available showing how much this
new, enhanced training has helped soldiers during real attacks, but
anecdotal evidence suggests it is making a difference. However, the wholly
unpredictable nature of people's reactions to a sudden attack was
tragically demonstrated in an almost copycat real-life tragedy that
uncannily occurred just 48 hours later.
The Jerusalem Post, February 24, reported as follows:
"Capt. (res.) Eliav Gelman, 30, was killed by 'friendly fire' in
the midst of a stabbing attack at the Gush Etzion junction in the West Bank
on Wednesday afternoon. Soldiers from an IDF unit securing the junction saw
a Palestinian armed with a knife charging at Gelman, an IDF spokeswoman
said. They fired at the assailant, striking both him and Gelman... Gelman
died from a gunshot wound to the chest. The terrorist [26-year-old Mamdouh
Tousef Amru, a Palestinian from the Hebron area] is in moderate
condition."
Through the use of the latest technology, efforts are being made to
minimize "friendly fire" incidents, but as unpredictable terror
attacks continue to occur anytime, anywhere, there can never be a cast-iron
guarantee that innocent bystanders will not be caught in the crossfire.
Paul Alster is an Israel-based journalist. Follow him on Twitter @paul_alster and visit his website: www.paulalster.com.
|
The IPT accepts no funding from
outside the United States, or from any governmental agency or political or
religious institutions. Your support of The Investigative Project on
Terrorism is critical in winning a battle we cannot afford to lose. All
donations are tax-deductible. Click here to donate online. The
Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation is a recognized 501(c)3
organization.
202-363-8602
- main
202-966-5191
- fax
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment