|
Steven Emerson,
Executive Director
|
November 28, 2016
|
|
Breaking
News: Pivotal Odeh Hearing Cancelled
IPT News
November 28, 2016
|
|
|
Share:
|
Be the
first of your friends to like this.
Editor's Note: For greater detail on the Rasmieh Odeh case, her
elevation to hero by Palestinian advocates and the impact on her victims,
please watch the Investigative Project on Terrorism's video series, "Spinning a Terrorist Into a Victim."
A federal judge in
Detroit on Monday cancelled a hearing which was expected to help determine
whether convicted Palestinian bomber Rasmieh Odeh receives a new trial for naturalization fraud.
Jurors convicted Odeh in 2014, but the Sixth Circuit Court of
Appeals sent the case back to U.S. District Judge Gershwin A.
Drain last February, ruling he erred when he precluded testimony that Odeh
suffers from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), which may have caused
her to provide false answers to immigration officials about her
terrorist past.
Odeh spent 10 years in an Israeli prison after confessing to her part in
twin 1969 bombings in Jerusalem – one at the British Consulate and one at a
grocery store that killed college students Edward Joffe and Leon Kanner.
Yet, when she came to the United States and later applied for
naturalization as a citizen in 2004, Odeh said she was never arrested or
imprisoned. During her trial, immigration officials testified that she never would have been allowed into the country, let
alone naturalized as a citizen, had they known of her terrorist past.
But Odeh claims her Israeli conviction, based in part on her own
confession, was the product of extensive torture. The only evidence for
this claim is her own word. Still, her attorneys want a new trial in which
jurors hear expert psychological testimony that PTSD caused Odeh to "filter" out her terrorist past. Thus,
when she claimed to have never been arrested or imprisoned, the argument goes,
she wasn't lying.
Before the 2014 trial, Judge Drain ruled that the nature of the
naturalization fraud charge made such testimony irrelevant. The Sixth
Circuit disagreed. But it did not overturn Odeh's conviction.
And it did not say the testimony had to be admitted in a new trial.
"We do not address other possible bases for excluding the evidence,
under evidentiary standards such as those identified by the district court
in its order discussing the use of PTSD testimony in federal and state
courts. Nor do we prescribe whether a new trial would be required once the
evidentiary determination has been made," the court ruled.
Tuesday's scheduled hearing was supposed to hash out the issue. But
early Monday, Drain notified the parties he would make a ruling based upon
briefs submitted earlier this month.
In their brief, prosecutors say the conviction should stand, noting that
Odeh's "filtering" theory has never been subjected to any scientific peer review. And
they described a number of Sixth Circuit precedents
regarding "red flags" on expert testimony which, they say, still
make Odeh's PTSD testimony inadmissible.
Cancelling Tuesday's hearing does not tip off Judge Drain's thinking.
While prosecutors specifically requested a hearing, and defense attorneys
said one was not necessary, Drain previously found that
Odeh was dishonest during her first trial's testimony.
And, as Cornell University Law Professor William Jacobson first noted, in their latest brief prosecutors say the
evidence indicates that the torture story is a lie. She confessed within a day of her arrest, records show. One
interrogator called her "an easy nut to crack" and testimony at
her trial in Israel indicated she identified more than 80 fellow members of
the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) terrorist group
who later were arrested.
In an interview with the Investigative Project on Terrorism, Jacobson
said the claim that Odeh's confession was based on torture may have been
concocted to save face.
Reached Monday morning, Jacobson said the hearing's late cancellation
was curious.
"Something [the judge] read this weekend must have caused him to do
that," Jacobson said. "He already was setting aside the whole
day." On the other hand, he may see "no need for a hearing
because the defense has not presented any evidence that their theory is
recognized in any way in medicine."
If the conviction stands, Odeh faces 18 months in prison, followed by
deportation.
Related Topics: Prosecutions,
Rasmieh
Odeh, Spinning
a Terrorist Into a Victim, Supersol
bombing, Edward
Joffe, Leon
Kanner, immigration
fraud, Gershwin
A. Drain, PTSD,
Sixth
Circuit Court of Appeals, William
Jacobson, Prosecutions
|
The IPT accepts no funding from
outside the United States, or from any governmental agency or political or
religious institutions. Your support of The Investigative Project on
Terrorism is critical in winning a battle we cannot afford to lose. All
donations are tax-deductible. Click here to donate online. The
Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation is a recognized 501(c)3
organization.
202-363-8602
- main
202-966-5191
- fax
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment