|
Saturday, March 31, 2018
Socialized Medicine: A Dose of Reality
ARROGANCE: Chinese Communist Party Mouthpiece ‘Global Times’ Calls For “Punishment” Against “Small” Canada
ARROGANCE: Chinese Communist Party Mouthpiece ‘Global Times’ Calls For “Punishment” Against “Small” Canada
Newspaper controlled by the Chinese Communist Party takes insulting and threatening line towards Canada – showing what the Communist regime really thinks about our nation.
Behind all the friendly globalist talk, we’re now finding out what China really thinks about Canada.The Global Times – a newspaper controlled and run by the Communist Party of China – has taken an insulting, arrogant, and threatening line towards Canada.
As noted by Reuters, the paper attacked Canada for proposed measures against steel being dumped into Canada (often from China) and then shipped into the US to bypass tariffs.
After saying they doubt that Canada and the European Union can be convinced by Washington to “go against China,” the article takes a darker, and more insulting line:“Canada’s steel imports from China only make up 9.8 percent of its total imports, with nearly no aluminum imports from China. In fact, Canada is more like a US colony economically, and half of its trade is with the US.”“Meanwhile, China is Canada’s second largest trading partner, with the fastest growth in trade. The two countries enjoy sound trade ties and have no major disputes. But by following the US suit, Canada is acting like a crafty merchant.”“Chinese people used to hold full respect for Western countries. But as their exchanges grow, these countries begin unveiling their selfish and cunning nature.”
Of course, nothing like this gets written without the approval of those at the top of China’s Communist Party, so regardless of any attempts to claim otherwise, this is clearly how China’s government views Canada.“We despise the way Canada vacillates between China and the US, and won’t readily let this go. Beijing should take punitive measures against Ottawa’s actions that undermine the interests of Chinese business, sending a warning to others.”“China’s Ministry of Commerce will figure out the most effective way to carry out the punishment. We have professional teams to cope with small countries of this kind.”
They want “punitive measures” taken against us, using us as an “example” to send a warning to others. They arrogantly refer to us as a “small” country, and say they have “effective” ways to “carry out the punishment.”
The arrogance shows that – despite China calling Canada a ‘colony’ of the US – the Communist regime wants to turn us into an economic colony of China.
Their attitude is about dictating to Canada – a far cry from media friendly rhetoric of “global cooperation.”
Once again, we see that dealing with China is not like dealing with democratic allies. And yet, rather than show strength and respond with toughness to China’s arrogance, Justin Trudeau is busy picking a fight with the democratic Indian government. He must be too cowardly and to weak to stand up for Canada against the ‘basic dictatorship’ he loves so much.
Spencer Fernando
Friday, March 30, 2018
Daniel Greenfield's article: Washington D.C. is the Most Unequal City in America
Daniel Greenfield's article: Washington D.C. is the
Most Unequal City in America
|
 |
|
Posted: 29 Mar 2018 10:07 AM PDT
Bernie Sanders,
Michael Moore and Elizabeth Warren, three lefty millionaires, got together to
solve "income inequality" in a town hall broadcast live from the
Capitol visitors center.
 Washington
D.C., where two out of the three parasites do business, has the worst income
inequality in the country. The bottom fifth of Washington D.C. account for
just 2% of the city’s income. It has one of the highest poverty rates in the
country and the highest food stamp use. And under Obama, the Imperial City of
the politicians and the poor was surrounded by some of the wealthiest
districts in the country.“Income Inequality in America: The Rise of Oligarchy and Collapse of the Middle Class,” the Sanders, Warren and Moore town hall, comes to progs from the most unequal and oligarchic city in America If Bernie, Liz and Michael really want to see income inequality, they can take a walk away from the marble and glass edifices of big government to see what big government had wrought. It isn’t any of their usual villains, the corporations and banks, who made Washington D.C. so miserable. It’s the triumph of socialism. Washington D.C. and its bedroom communities are what the entire country would look like if the left got its way. A socialist apartheid state divided between the business of government and the poor. But the three socialist stooges aren’t just in the business of politics. They’re millionaire poverty pimps. Bernie Sanders made over $1 million pushing conspiracy theories about income inequality. Denouncing big business let him rent a private Delta 767 with a menu of herb crusted lamb loin, chocolate ganache and fine cheeses. The Sanders clan is up to 3 homes now and Bernie is using his clout to get two of his kids elected to political offices. Who better to lecture us on the “Rise of Oligarchy” than an oligarch? Bernie made it from living on unemployment to the 1 percent using the government. But there’s only room for so many senators who can run for president in Washington D.C. That’s one government program you can’t replicate for everyone living in D.C. slums on government money. Elizabeth Warren is there to show Bernie what a truly ambitious socialist poverty pimp can do. Lizzie owns a $740K condo in D.C. a far more expensive Victorian home in Cambridge and has a net worth of over $15 million. She picked up a $625K advance for A Fighting Chance, a book attacking corporations, paid to her by a corporation. Her follow-up, This Fight is Out Right, earned her only a $200K advance last year. Harvard Law School’s “first woman of color” also made $350,000 for teaching one class. But there’s only so much room for a fake Cherokee asbestos lawyer slash consumer advocate who likes to tell other people they didn’t accomplish anything before going back to one of her luxurious homes. Like Bernie, Lizzie is just fighting for the “little guy”. Here’s what that looks like. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, her own government agency, operates from a luxurious building that cost more per square foot than the Trump World Tower or the Bellagio in Vegas. If only there were some sort of agency to protect taxpayers from the CFPB and Elizabeth Warren. And then there’s Michael Moore. 
Moore has his own fake working class story and he rode his fake
anti-capitalist documentaries to a fortune in cash, much of it through
alleged serial rapist Harvey Weinstein. At one point, Moore owned 9 homes.
That’s more homes than Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren combined. The
pudgy leftist got famous pushing gun control, but has been known to go places
with nine bodyguards.
The town hall paid tribute to unions. Michael Moore busted them. Two of his writers were warned that if they operated under union rules, one of them would be fired. And so they had to keep working without health benefits instead. Michael Moore and Bernie Sanders inveigh against employers. But they were terrible bosses. Bernie, the friend of the working man, was known to his staff as “abusive”, a “screamer and a table-banger.” His campaign had its own #MeToo chapter with an accused sexual harasser being covered for by the Bernie campaign. "I remember feeling physically unsafe," his California outreach director said. It’s hard to think of three worse choices to discuss income inequality and oligarchy than three millionaires with more than a dozen homes between them who treat their employees like garbage. But Sanders, Warren and Moore aren’t just random rich people. They’re poverty pimps who got rich by pretending that they had something to say about the plight of working class people in America. Washington D.C. is full of poverty pimps. They come in all shapes, sizes and colors. But the one thing that they have in common is that they get rich by keeping the poor where they are. Their only solution is to turn the working class into the welfare class where they can be milked for book deals and documentaries. And office buildings that cost more per square foot than a luxurious Vegas casino. Much like Washington D.C., Sanders, Warren and Moore have something to tell us about income inequality and whose fault it really is. "How do we create an economy that works for everybody?" Bernie asked. Bernie’s answer is to turn the rest of the country into Washington D.C. with lots of government money for those on top and government subsidies for those on the bottom. There’s not much of a middle class in Washington D.C. and the Imperial City had one of the biggest middle class declines in the country. It’s odd that Bernie and Lizzie don’t have much to say about that. But what can they say? Take away everything except the government and its satellite industries, contractors, lobbyists, experts, non-profits and academics, and you end up with the apartheid urban template that is Washington D.C. Moore, Warren and Sanders talk about a middle class because they know that’s where much of their audience comes from. But they ideologically loathe it. In their ideal world, there’s no middle class. None of the consumers who, as Bernie famously decried, want a “choice of 23 underarm spray deodorants.” And none of the small businessmen who, as Warren even more famously complained, think they built it. The middle class is naturally conservative. It’s aspirational. It seeks security, not revolution. And what leftists are really peddling is a revolution that will leave them even more on top than they already are. If you want to see income inequality in America, don’t tune in to watch three leftist millionaires put on their outrage show, look at their homes, and look at where that power and money comes from. It doesn’t come from hard work. It’s hard to point to anything that Bernie ever accomplished. Like Moore and Warren, he got very rich because of his politics. Income inequality made these three poverty pimps into millionaires. They’re very rich because they’re members of the right party with the right views. Washington D.C. and the big blue cities where income inequality is at its worst are full of those like them. Venezuela, the Soviet Union and North Korea don’t always happen overnight. The middle class is slowly hollowed out by a growing nomenklatura whose only expertise is in wealth redistribution. And that’s how you end up with millionaire poverty pimps and no middle class. |
Should Terrorists Be Questioned About Their Faith?
Opinion and Poll
Should Terrorists
Be Questioned About Their Faith? The UK watchdog of terror legislation
says not necessarily Read and Comment 
Interview
Is Islamism a
Problem in America's Workplaces? What happens when freedom of religion
and disruptive practices collide Read
Feature
The Murder No One
Is Talking About Does the UN's Declaration of Human Rights only apply
selectively? Read more
News
Off the Record
with the Crown Prince Getting more clarity on the successor to the throne of Saudi
Arabia Read More
Readers Write
“These barbaric ways do not
belong in our country. Conform or return from whence you came. Thank God that
girl and her siblings were rescued.”
- J.B.
“When I worked terrorism a
long time ago, the DoD definition of terrorism was 'a criminal act committed to
achieve a political goal.' We don't know what the Austin bombers motives were.”
- J.W.
The Clarion Project is a registered 501(c)(3). Donations
are tax deductible.
|
|
Eye on Iran: Saudi Prince Calls for Stepped-Up Pressure on Iran
 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
