New
Book Exposes Depth of Anti-Israel Hate on American Campuses
by Noah Beck
Special to IPT News
March 28, 2018
|
|
|
|
Share:  
|
  Be the
first of your friends to like this.
 About six months
after Andrew Pessin posted on his Facebook profile a defense of Israel
during its 2014 war against Hamas, the once popular Connecticut College
philosophy professor was subjected to an academic smear campaign. The school
paper published articles defaming him. The administration hosted
condemnations of Pessin from across the campus community on the school's
website, and tolerated other anti-Semitic activities that only
worsened the climate for Jews and Israel supporters. Pessin received death
threats and, in the spring of 2015, took a medical leave of absence. The
Connecticut College administration offered no meaningful protection or
support to Pessin, and never issued any apology for its role in his abuse.
The Pessin affair was part of a growing trend of anti-Israel hostility on
U.S. campuses, but at least his story has a somewhat happy ending. Pessin
resumed teaching last fall after an extended paid sabbatical, and –
together with a colleague – convinced the school to establish a Jewish
Studies program. Moreover, he has edited a new book with Fordham
University's Doron Ben-Atar on the general campus trend: Anti-Zionism on Campus: The University, Free Speech, and
BDS. Ben-Atar, who is part of Fordham's American Studies program,
protested at a faculty meeting about the 2013 passing of a resolution
calling for a boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) targeting Israel,
only to find himself soon being investigated for unspecified charges,
resulting in a Kafkaesque campaign of intimidation and vilification.
This volume of essays, by faculty and students who have confronted anti-Israelism
on their campuses, documents and analyzes how this movement masks an
underlying anti-Semitism that creates a hostile environment for Jews while
undermining free speech and civility.
Writer Noah Beck interviewed Pessin via email.
Q: Your book catalogues the many underhanded tactics used to promote
the anti-Israel agenda on college campuses, which should help Israel
advocates prepare for what awaits them. Did your personal ordeal inspire
you to create a potential resource for campus Israel advocates? Or did you
have the idea for such a book even before what happened to you?
Pessin: I had been observing the general campus scene for some time, but
passively; like many professors, I preferred to spend my time teaching and
doing my research, rather than get involved in the mess. And so, when I
read about Doron's affair at Fordham, being persecuted for standing up for
Israel, I simply thought, "That's terrible," then clicked on the
next story. It was only six months later, when I began to receive hundreds
of emails of support from around the world, that I realized how important
it is to hear from people off campus. So I wrote to him, belatedly, to
offer my support—and he wrote back immediately to suggest we collect
narratives from faculty members who have been on the receiving end of
anti-Israel nastiness on their campuses. Though the book evolved from
there—we include several more analytical essays, as well as some narratives
from students—that's how it was born.
Q: What would you say is the principal message of the book?
Pessin: The book is not about "defending Israel." Indeed, a
good number of our contributors are people who are critical of various
Israel policies, of settlements, etc. What it is about is how the
anti-Israel movement manifests itself on campuses around the world. And as
you work through the essays it becomes clear: the anti-Israel campus
movement corrodes the academy in every way, on every level, it harms
scholarship, teaching, community, it violates numerous academic and moral
norms, and more. Whatever you specifically think about Israel and the
Israeli-Palestinian-Jewish-Arab-Muslim conflict, the campus movement
largely operates not as a bona fide academic movement but as something more
sinister. There are legitimate ways to be supportive of the Palestinian
cause on campus, but this isn't one of them. (Pessin exhaustively outlined
legitimate ways to support Palestinians on campus in his 2017 article.)
Q: What factors did you consider when selecting the different
contributors for this collection of essays?
Pessin: When we put out the original "calls for papers" we
were shocked at the response. Within weeks we had some thirty faculty
members who wanted to share their stories, of being targeted for standing
up for Israel, or even for just not hating Israel. The problem is
that pervasive. Most of these stories happen entirely under the radar,
either on smaller campuses or in such a way that the media doesn't pick
them. We tried to select the most compelling stories, the most
representative stories, the ones that could teach people something. There
were several we wanted to include but could not because legal procedures were
in place that precluded their contributing. There was one who opted out
because he didn't want to relive what was a devastating personal
experience.
Q: What types of campus activity and speech, if any, should be
suppressed (regardless of which side benefits), and under what principles?
What, for example, is your view on the lawsuit against Fordham for refusing
to allow a chapter of SJP [Students for Justice in Palestine] to form?
Pessin: That's a good question. We all believe in free speech. We all
are opposed to hate speech. But does opposition to hate speech mean you may
censor or restrict or punish hate speech? What about speech that consists
of slander and defamation and demonization? The traditional norms of the
academy suggest we should err on the side of the freedom, to hear all
sides, even the evil sides. So nothing should be "suppressed,"
not even the most hateful, slanderous speech. But of course it should be
answered. Lies should be countered, motives should be exposed, and while
the simple label "anti-Semitic" can be abused (as can labels such
as "racist" or "Islamophobic"), you shouldn't hesitate
to explain and defend exactly how and why you take some particular speech
or action to be anti-Semitic. As for Fordham, while I deeply respect
the courage of that decision, I'm not sure in the end it was the right
decision. Perhaps they should let the group form, but then closely observe
its activities (as they observe all student groups) to be sure it operates
within appropriate academic and community norms.
Q: Some anti-Israel activists argue that they are widely suppressed
on campuses, and routinely maligned in the press and by organized Jewish
and pro-Israel groups. What would you say in response?
Pessin: They do like to claim there is a "Palestine exception"
[depriving Palestinian advocates of their free speech on campus]. And in
the past few years Jewish and pro-Israel groups, both on and off campus, have
gotten more vocal as they begin to take the anti-Israel movement more
seriously as a genuine threat to Jewish students and to the academy in
general. Indeed, we hope our book, by documenting the problem, will help
inform and thus contribute to that response. The problem is that
anti-Israel activists take nearly every criticism, every objection, every
argument against them to be "censorship" and
"suppression," rather than recognize these as academically
appropriate responses to them. What they essentially want is unlimited
freedom of speech to slander and defame Israel and pro-Israel faculty and
students, while rejecting the freedom of speech of others to respond to
them.
Q: Your sobering introduction highlights how the campus
"debate" has become so extreme as to shut down any meaningful
discussion in favor of assertions that, "Israel and Zionism are...illegitimate,
incorrigible abominations" as you describe it. How should
pro-Israel activists counter this strategy when those espousing it have no
interest in reasonable or balanced discussion?
Pessin: You've put your finger on a central point. The anti-Israel
attack on the academy as a whole is reflected most clearly in (a) the
personal attacks on pro-Israel individuals documented in the book and (b)
the utter rejection of the pro-Israel voice via campus disruptions, the
relentless calls to boycott, and the rejection of "normalization"
(i.e. refusal to have any dialogue with pro-Israel voices). They couldn't
be more explicit in their aims: the Israeli perspective, including the
intimate connection between the Jewish perspective in general and the
Israeli perspective, is simply not to be permitted on campus. They object
to the "Palestine exception" while explicitly and actively
advocating for and executing the "Israel exception" to free
speech. The best response, I think, is to repeatedly and vocally point this
out, and thus promote and defend our book's principal message: that
whatever you may think about the conflict over there, the anti-Israel
movement over here is profoundly antithetical to the academic and
moral norms of the campus environment.
Q: Because on nearly every campus Jews and Israel supporters are
severely outnumbered, their disadvantaged position arguably mirrors that of
Israel's in global forums. Yet Israel -- thanks to its technology, security
intelligence, and many other assets -- has managed to reduce the impact of
international boycotts, lopsided UN votes, and other fora where attempts to
punish or isolate Israel used to succeed far more. Is there any similar set
of assets that Jews and Israel supporters on campus can leverage to start turning
the tide in their favor?
Pessin: That's a great way of putting the question. It highlights what
is simultaneously both an asset and a liability on campus: the many smart,
talented, Jewish faculty and students on many campuses. The significant
majority are generally supportive of Israel, but for many reasons they tend
not to be vocal on campus, while the small minority who are Israel-haters
tend to be very vocal. What's necessary is to give that majority the
courage to stand up, speak up, and be heard—and denounce the anti-academic
antisemitism that largely characterizes the anti-Israel movement. We hope
our book will help in that regard, by letting potential advocates know they
are not alone.
Anti-Zionism on Campus comes out April 1.
Noah Beck is the author of The
Last Israelis, an apocalyptic novel about Iranian nukes
and other geopolitical issues in the Middle East.
|
Print
Send
RSS
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment