|
by
Alan M. Dershowitz • July 27, 2019 at 4:00 am
- You
appear determined to concoct a false narrative of my
life....To support your false narrative, you began your
negative "research"... by sourcing a Holocaust
denial site that circulates false stories about prominent
Jews, including me. You then interviewed my enemies, my
critics, dissenting students and especially anti-Israel and,
in some cases anti-Semitic, zealots.... The original
reporting... did not include interviews with longtime friends
and associates... You agreed to speak to a handful of such people
only at the last minute, after I complained to the editor. But
even then when some people called you, you told them the story
was closed.
- It
is undisputed...that neither Al nor Tipper Gore ever met
Jeffrey Epstein or were ever on his island. The Accuser's
description is a complete and total fabrication and/or
fantasy. I asked her attorney David Boies to call his former
client Al Gore to check on whether she was lying about the
Gores. He refused to do so....Secret Service records establish
that Bill Clinton was never on Jeffrey Epstein's island.
President Clinton has confirmed this fact.
- I
have provided The New Yorker with transcripts of
recordings in which David Boies acknowledges that it would
have been "impossible" for me to have been in the
places Roberts claims to have met me and that Roberts is
"wrong... simply wrong," in accusing me. The actual
tapes were played for Bruck.
- Like
the first Accuser, she [the Second Accuser] only began to
accuse me after she met David Boies. There is an insidious
pattern here. The women first indicate they never had sex with
me; then they meet Boies. Then they suddenly
"remember" they had sex with me. Boies must know
that both Accusers cannot be believed and that they made up
the stories about me in the hope of getting money (which they
got). Yet, he submitted their false affidavits, vouching for
their credibility without disclosing to the courts their [both
women's] documented history of lying about prominent people.
- The
New Yorker must know that
there is absolutely, categorically, no evidence that I was
ever in the same place as my Accusers or that I had any sexual
contact with them. The New Yorker must also know that
in addition to the absence of any evidence against me, there
is overwhelming indisputable evidence that I could not and did
not commit the acts of which I am accused.
- In
all three instances, my false Accusers have refused to make
their accusations to the media on the record. They have made
them only in court papers, hiding behind the litigation
privilege, which precludes defamation suits for false
statements. This is a tactic developed and employed by David
Boies to prevent any legal accountability for false
accusations. The New Yorker must publish the fact that
my accusers have refused to go on the record (or presumably
off the record) with The New Yorker or any other
publication in accusing me. If it repeats these false
accusations, without confronting the accusers directly, The
New Yorker will have done precisely what judges and others
have condemned: namely using the judicial process as both a
sword and a shield for false accusations.
Alan
Dershowitz: "The New Yorker must know that there is
absolutely, categorically, no evidence that I was ever in the same
place as my Accusers or that I had any sexual contact with them.
The New Yorker must also know that in addition to the absence of any
evidence against me, there is overwhelming indisputable evidence
that I could not and did not commit the acts of which I am
accused." (Photo:Getty Images)
As I have previously written, The New Yorker has
commissioned a hit piece that seems calculated to silence my voice
on President Trump, Prime Minister Netanyahu and Israel.
Here below is a letter I sent to the editor, the
writer and the fact checkers. I have received only a formal
response assuring me that the article will be fair. I replied that
this will be up to the readers and the courts to judge.
|
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment