from NY to Israel Sultan Reveals
The Stories Behind the News

They Kill Us and We're the Ones to Blame

Posted: 07 Nov 2009 06:27 PM PST

Hardly had the final shots been fired at Fort Hood and
hospitals were filling up with the wounded that the media rushed to assign
blame for the massacre, not of course to Nidal Malik Hassan, who had
opened fire aiming to kill as many soldiers as possible, but on the US
Army and on his fellow soldiers.

Completely ignoring his Islamic ideology and Palestinian Arab
background, the media speculated that he might have been suffering from
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, even though he had never served in a combat
zone, that he was angry over being deployed to Iraq, even though he had a
history of pro-terrorist postings predating that, and finally that he had
been bullied by other soldiers for being a Muslim, a claim that has since
emerged as completely baseless. All of these however were ways of shifting
the blame from Nidal Hassan and his Islamist ideology, and onto his
victims, the men and women he had tried to kill, and the United States
Army itself. Once again the media apparatchiks had decided that blame for
a Muslim killing spree rested not with the perpetrator, but with his
targets.

If Muslims follow a predictable pattern in their homicidal
attacks, their Western Dhimmi apologists follow an equally predictable
pattern, always willing to shift the blame onto anything and anyone, but
the killers themselves and their hatefilled ideology. It's never Islam.
Never the Koran. Instead it's always the general unfairness of our foreign
policy, our flagwaving and our obstinate refusal to let Muslims have
whatever part of the world they have their sights on today.

Once again, they kill us and yet somehow we're the ones to blame. Because we
didn't love and nurture poor Nidal Malik Hassan enough. We didn't install
enough foot baths, respect his religion hard enough and worst of all we
presumed to make war on his brothers who had murdered thousands of us on
September 11. That of course is our original sin, fighting back.

As we speak the media talking heads are still furrowing their great weary
brows, scratching behind their ears and wondering, what could the motive
possibly be. The FBI, which has no doubt gone through more sensitivity and
tolerance sessions than Nidal Hassan spent with his ass in the air at his
local mosque, is of course also searching hard for a motive.

Currently some of the talking heads are peddling PTSD by Proxy, to
avoid the minor problem that Hassan had never actually served in combat.
Should this brand of lunacy take hold, it would allow anyone and everyone
who has been near people who might have conceivably had PTSD to claim PTSD
by Proxy as if it were a cold virus passing through the air. Somehow this
is made to seem more logical than that Nidal Hassan tried to kill a number
of soldiers because he believed that his religion commanded him to do
this. An event that had already occurred before and for which we have the
evidence of his own words praising suicide bombers as
heroes.

Thomas Kenniff, a former JAG who tried to bring some logic
to the subject in his appearance on Larry King, was denounced as a racist
for pouring cold water on the attempts to sell PTSD by Proxy as the
motive, instead pointing to Hassan's radical beliefs. For this Olbermann
denounced him as the Worst Person in the World. Thomas Kenniff's crime was
to interfere in the narrative that Larry King and just about everyone was
trying to sell, of Nidal Hassan as another example of a worn out and
overstressed US Army in which all the soldiers are on the breaking point.

By ignoring the fact that 66 percent of the deliberate
attacks within the US military by other soldiers, have involved Muslims--
the media is engaging in blatant deceptiveness. Unless Muslims somehow
suffer from a form of PTSD more severe than non-Muslim soldiers, or unless
Muslims comprise 66 percent of the US military-- both false statements, it
is obvious that the question of Islamic beliefs should be investigated as
central to these acts of violence.

But PTSD is still the narrative
the media insists on going with, and will insist on going with, even if
Nidal Hassan comes on TV tomorrow and proclaims that he did it all for
Allah. That is because PTSD fits the liberal narrative of blaming the
media and exonerating Hassan specifically and Islam in general, while
indicting the US and the military. It turns Hassan into a victim, and his
victims into either co-victims or perpetrators.

As this charade
continues, more claims of Hassan's supposed harassment for being Muslim
will be employed to create some equivalent of Colin Ferguson's "Black
Rage" defense. The military will in turn work harder to bend over for
Muslims and look the other way at radicalism and extremism, while cracking
down on any criticism of Muslim misbehavior in the ranks, exactly the sort
of behavior that will help insure another Fort Hood
massacre.

Meanwhile the dominant narrative will be Nidal Hassan's
suffering, his pain and his agony. Not that of his victims. All lies that
will reveal that the media knows quite well why he did it. Had Nidan
Hassan's name actually been Michael Smith, and had he actually been
suffering from PTSD, the media would not be spending all this time
defending him and exploring his pain. He did not simply commit his crimes
because he is a Muslim, the media is defending him because he is a Muslim
and in particular a terrorist.

These sorts of apologetics for
terror have a long and shameful history for western liberals. When Hitler
sent his troops goosestepping along, it wasn't his fault, but that of
British and French Imperialism for oppressing the German people. Only when
German troops attacked the homeland of socialism, the USSR, did they
finally wake up long enough to get in front of the troops, until the war
was over, and then American soldiers once again became the brutal
occupiers who were preventing Western Europe from being "liberated" by the
glorious Red Army.

Stalin too was never to blame for anything, it
was all the Western spies and capitalist agents who were constantly trying
to subvert the Great Socialist experiment who were at fault. And how could
one blame Stalin for killing millions of them, when they kept popping up
everywhere, doing such subversive things as eating, breathing and smiling
at the wrong time. The same great heroes of Western Liberalism who put pen
to bloody ink in advertisements supporting the Moscow Trials, would defend
every Soviet atrocity and wail that American nuclear missiles were
endangering the world. Not Soviet nuclear weapons of course. Never. Those
were only a defensive response to Western imperialist
aggression.

When the armies of four Arab nations (3 out of 4 of
them run by Arab Socialist regimes, two of those being Baath Party
dictatorships) prepared to invade Israel and "drive the Jews into the
sea", the same liberals who would spend the next forty years after that
war wailing about the plight of the Jordanians and Egyptians who had
colonized Israeli territory and now found themselves inside Israel, aka
the Palestinians, remained absolutely silent. The prospective genocide of
millions of Jews only two decades after the Holocaust did not trouble them
in the least. The Israelis were the ones to blame for presuming to build a
country that the USSR and its Arab Socialist allies wanted to destroy.

Nazism and Communism are down for the count, and Arab Socialism
is being rapidly replaced by Islamism. And the Islamists are the new
murderers who are somehow always the victims. Always.

When a car
bomb goes off in Kabul, the media quickly rushes to brush off their
talking points about negotiating with the Taliban. When Muslim pirates
take hostages, we're told that it's only because the poor dears are hungry
and fighting against pollution, making them the world's first Islamic
Pirate Environmentalists. When four airplanes are hijacked and aimed at
national landmarks, naturally it's because of Muslim outrage over the long
list of things they're currently outraged about. When rockets are fired at
Israeli villages, clearly it's Israel for not making as many concessions
to terrorists as everyone in the "world community" and various British
labor unions thinks they should be making.

It is of course never
the terrorists' fault. Heaven forbid. Ours is but to die and take the
blame for the actions of our murderers.