from NY to Israel Sultan Reveals
The Stories Behind the News

The Moral Disarmament of the Civilized World

Posted: 28 Feb 2010 07:57 PM PST

There are two ways to disarm a people. You can disarm them by
taking away their weapons, or you can disarm their minds by taking away
their willingness and ability to fight back. Disarmament a people by
confiscating their weapons is a weak solution, because people can always
make or smuggle new weapons. And without weapons they can still use their
numbers and their fists. They can continue fighting so long as they
believe that they have the right to defend themselves.

And that is the far great disarmament, the disarmament not of
bodies, but of minds. The disarmament of the moral right of self-defense
by convincing entire peoples that they are the perpetrators and their
attackers are the victims. And that in any case self-defense is futile.
That it is better to be quiet, to keep your head down, to learn to get
along, to hope that your leaders make whatever deals are necessary to keep
the peace, and to replace them with even more spineless leaders if they
don't.

That is the moral disarmament of the civilized world and it
is going on every day, even in countries where there are guns to be found
everywhere, the people's minds are being disarmed, rendered helpless and
impotent in the face of the enemy. Because it is not the gun that matters,
but the man willing to fire it. A home can be filled with guns from top to
bottom, but if the homeowner refuses to use them a robber breaks into his
home, because he is not certain whether the robber might not have the
right to burglarize him after all-- then even surrounded by a thousand
rifles, he has already been disarmed.

Like every great tyranny, the
left has always known that the chains must be placed not merely on men's
bodies and property, but first and foremost on their minds. Merely placing
chains on a man does not make him a slave. He must be taught to think of
himself as a slave. To see himself as inferior and worthless. He cannot be
prevented by escaping only through threats of violence, instead he must be
brought to think that he does not deserve freedom. That whatever
dissatisfaction he has with his current condition is his own fault, and
that slavery is actually a kindness being rendered unto him. Then his body
need no longer be chained. His body can be free and he will remain a
slave, because it is his mind that has been chained.

There are many
forms of moral disarmament, but they are all directed at depriving a man
not merely of freedoms and rights, but of the idea that he has any
freedoms and rights. The second amendment comes after the first, and so
before the disarmament of self-defense, there is the disarmament of the
pen and the voice, in which people learn to censor themselves, to replace
"crimethink" with "bellyfeel duckspeak", to avoid saying things that are
not yet illegal, but are disapproved of. And even when they do say them,
they take great care to demonstrate that they are not engaging in
"crimethink", but that though admittedly controversial, their ideas are
legitimate and not extremist. They apologize for their words before they
say them, which is the intellectual equivalent of going to war with your
hands thrown up in the air. And so before they speak, they have already
been disarmed.

There is the moral disarmament of the military and
security forces who are taught to see themselves not as honorable
defenders of their homeland, but as dishonorable brutes and tools of
government policy, whose only real purpose is suppressing internal
dissent. There is the moral disarmament of academics who are forced to
parrot the currently popular relativism and reject the idea that there are
absolute truths beyond ideology and politics. There is the moral
disarmament of politicians who are given every chance to be greedy and
corrupt, while being warned against taking any principled stands not in
compliance with the party doctrine. But these are all parts of the Great
Moral Disarmament which insists on the worthlessness of the individual and
the country, except when they reflect the ideals of their own destruction.
Ideals which themselves declare the worthlessness of the individual and
the country.

This Catch 22 underlies the moral disarmament of the free
world. For if one says that America, England or Israel are worthless
unless they give the same rights to terrorists that they do to their
citizens-- he is in effect saying that America, England and Israel are
worthless either way, as he is only prepared to accept their worth if they
demonstrate their willingness to destroy themselves. And that is exactly
what he means.

If you want the American left to love their country,
all you have to do is turn it over to them so they can destroy it. But
that is of course difficult to do unless you first convince the people
that those who would destroy the country are actually its saviors, that
their hate is actually love, and that all who oppose them are amoral
monsters. To do this takes more than mere propaganda, but it requires
upending their values so that black is white, right is wrong and wrong is
right. Self-defense becomes a crime and terrorism becomes a virtue. Hate
for America is actually love, and love for America is actually
hate.

And that is where the moral disarmament comes in. For if you
surrender your values, you have been disarmed. If you do not have any new
values to replace them with, you may be able to fight in your own
interest. But few people are able to live entirely without values. And
these new values mark the transition from disarmament to slavery. For the
easiest way to make a free man into a slave, is to make him forget what
makes him free, and then to forget that he is free, and finally to forget
that he should want to be free.

To do this you must pervert his
values. You must convince him that his individualism, his ownlife,
is evil. That his desire for freedom is an act of greed and selfishness
that actively leads to the murders of small children in the Third World.
That his belief that he has a right to defend himself is a thoughtcrime
that represents a dangerous homicidal madness. That any resentment he has
toward the authorities or the people attacking him is only due to his own
ignorance and prejudices. That he must embrace his would-be killers, give
up his freedom and property, and submit to the authorities in order to be
a good and moral person.

And now he is no longer a free man. Now he
is a slave.

The moral disarmament of the civilized world has been
done for the benefit of the left, but its ultimate benefit will not be for
the left, but for Islam. For Islam is the religion of slaves, even more so
than Socialism. Under Islam all men are already slaves, the only
difference is that some are of a higher slave caste than others. Islam too
promises the emergence of a perfectly just society when it takes power.
The left sees Islam as an ally, but in fact it is a competitor. Both are
ideologies that offer up slavery as a just society. Both are fanatical and
murderous, operating by treachery and deceit, and taking power by
exploiting fifth columns and making false agreements.

The left has
worked steadily toward the moral and physical disarmament of the civilized
world, without considering that the world will not be run of Brussels or
governed by men in blue helmets. Not even Europe will be run that way for
long. In their lust for power, the left has disarmed the free world,
without considering that just as in Iran, Islam will rise to take the
spoils of their long political war against the free world.

An old Soviet joke. A man visits a doctor. The doctor tells him
that he is suffering from a progressive paralysis. The man breathes a sigh
of relief. "At least it is progressive." The left too is a progressive
paralysis for the civilized world. And though the left thinks that it has
genuine power, the Muslim politicians who are elected to power from
liberal parties, are Muslims first. And when the time is right, there will
not need to be any armed coups. The same men who ran as Labor or Democrats
will simply pledge allegiance to the banner of Islam under Sharia law. It
has happened before. It is happening now.

The left's moral
disarmament of the civilized world was intended to make free men into
slaves, but it is also their own death warrant. For it disarms the only
ones who might protect them from the final consequences of their own
hunger for power.