The Political Violence of the Bible and the Koran

The Political Violence of the Bible and the Koran

September 10, 2010

One of the most frequently used arguments heard in the defense of Islam is
that the Bible is just as violent as the Koran. The logic goes like this. If
the Koran is no more violent than the Bible, then why should we worry about
Islam? This argument is that Islam is the same as Christianity and Judaism.
This is false, but this analogy is very popular, since it allows someone who
knows nothing about the actual doctrine of Islam to talk about it. “See,
Islam is like Christianity, Christians are just as violent as Muslims.”
If this is true, then you don’t have to learn anything about the actual
Islamic doctrine.

However, this is not a theological argument. It is a political one. This argument
is not about what goes on in a house of worship, but what goes on the in the
marketplace of ideas.

Now, is the doctrine of Islam more violent than the Bible? There is only one
way to prove or disprove the comparison and that is to measure the differences
in violence in the Koran and the Bible.

The first item is to define violence. The only violence that matters to someone
outside of either Islam or Christianity or Judaism is what they do to the “other”,
political violence. Cain killing Able is not political violence. Political violence
is not killing a lamb for a meal or making an animal sacrifice. Note, however,
a vegan or a PETA member considers both of these actions to be violent, but
it is not violence against them.

The next item is to compare the doctrines both quantitatively and qualitatively.
The political violence of the Koran is called “fighting in Allah’s
cause”, or jihad.

We must do more than measure the jihad in the Koran. Islam has three sacred
texts: Koran, Sira and Hadith, the Islamic Trilogy. The Sira is Mohammed’s
biography. The Hadith are his traditions—what he did and said. Sira and
Hadith form the Sunna, the perfect pattern of all Islamic behavior.

The Koran is the smallest of the three books, the Trilogy. It is only 16% of
the Trilogy text . This means that the Sunna is 84% of the word content of Islam’s
sacred texts. This statistic alone has large implications. Most of the Islamic
doctrine is about Mohammed, not Allah. The Koran says 91 different times that
Mohammed is the perfect pattern of life. It is much more important to know Mohammed
than the Koran. This is very good news. It is easy to understand a biography
about a man. To know Islam, know Mohammed.

It turns out that jihad occurs in large proportion in all three texts. Here
is a chart about the results:

It is very significant that the Sira devotes 67% of its text to jihad. Mohammed
averaged an event of violence every 6 weeks for the last 9 years of his life.
Jihad was what made Mohammed successful. Here is a chart of the growth of Islam.

Basically, when Mohammed was a preacher of religion, Islam grew at the rate
of 10 new Muslims per year. But when he turned to jihad, Islam grew at an average
rate of 10,000 per year. All of the details of how to wage jihad are recorded
in great detail. The Koran gives the great vision of jihad—world conquest
by the political process. The Sira is a strategic manual and the Hadith is a
tactical manual of jihad.

Now let’s go to the Hebrew Bible. When we count all of the political violence,
we find that 5.6% of the text is devoted to it. There is no admonition towards
political violence in the New Testament.

When we count the magnitude of words devoted to political violence, we have
327,547 words in the Trilogy and 34,039 words in the Hebrew Bible . The Trilogy
has 9.6 times as much wordage devoted to political violence as the Hebrew Bible.

The real problem goes far beyond the quantitative measurement of ten times
as much violent material; there is the qualitative measurement. The political
violence of the Koran is eternal and universal. The political violence of the
Bible was for that particular historical time and place. This is the vast difference
between Islam and other ideologies. The violence remains a constant threat to
all non-Islamic cultures, now and into the future. Islam is not analogous to
Christianity and Judaism in any practical way. Beyond the one-god doctrine,
Islam is unique unto itself.

Another measurement of the difference between the violence found in the Judeo/Christian
texts as opposed to that of Islam is found in the use of fear of violence against
artists, critics and intellectuals. What artist, critic or intellectual ever
feels a twinge of fear if condemning anything Christian or Jewish? However,
look at the examples of the violent political threats and murders of Salman
Rushdie, Theo van Gogh, Pim Fortune, Kurt Westergaard of the Danish Mohammed
cartoons, and many others. What artist, critic or intellectual has not had a
twinge of fear about Islam when it comes to free expression? The political difference
in the response to the two different doctrines is enormous. The political fruit
from the two trees is as different as night and day.

It is time for so-called intellectuals to get down to the basics of judging
Islam by its actual doctrine, not making lame analogies that are sophomoric
assertions. Fact-based reasoning should replace fantasies that are based upon
political correctness and multiculturalism.



Bill Warner,

Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam

Permalink http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=8420195&msgid=321562&act=9SO1&c=162528&destination=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politicalislam.com%2Fblog%2Fthe-political-violence-of-the-bible-and-the-koran%2F

copyright (c) CBSX, LLC

politicalislam.com Use and distribute
as you wish; do not edit and give us credit.

This message was sent from Bill Warner. It was sent from: Political Islam . com, Suite 500 3212 West End Av , Nashville, TN 37203. Email Marketing by