By Douglas J. Hagmann
16 September 2012: Most
people have heard the fable about the frog and the scorpion, but in the
event you haven’t, I’ll briefly recount it here. A scorpion asks a frog
to carry him on his back to the other side of a stream. The frog
initially refuses, telling the scorpion that he would likely sting and
kill him along the journey. The scorpion promises not to, pointing out
that they would both die if the scorpion was to sting the frog in the
middle of the water. The frog then said that the scorpion would sting
the frog once they were on the other side. The scorpion scoffed, telling
the frog that he would be too grateful to do something as sinister as
that.
Like the story of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, the tale does not have a happy ending. After the frog agrees to carry the scorpion, the frog gets stung in the middle of the stream, dooming them both. When the frog asks the scorpion why, the scorpion simply replies, “it is my nature.” Believe what you wish about America’s foreign policy, but Ambassador Stevens succumbed to the sting of the scorpion that is inherent in the nature of Islamic fundamentalism that exists under the pretext of what is termed “Arab Spring.”
The Obama doctrine
On June 4, 2009, Barack Hussein Obama made what many describe as a conciliatory speech in Cairo, which laid the foundation for his
foreign policy in the Arab World. Thus began a doctrine of overt
acquiescence and apology, followed by an active policy of engagement
against certain Middle East dictators who were repressing democracy. At
least that’s the way it was made to appear on the surface.
Obama’s actions by funding and arming
the very element who promised not to “sting” us illustrates only one of
two possibilities. Either inexplicable naiveté by Obama, or a deliberate
course of action designed to create orchestrated chaos across the
Middle East. While Ambassador Stevens might have adhered to the ideology
that by helping our enemies, our actions would cause them to suddenly
abandon their inherent nature and become our friends, it is unlikely
that this was, or is Obama ‘s mindset. By all accounts and by his own
admission, he is fully aware of that ideology as he lived it.
Given our experiences over the last
fifty years and through multiple administrations, we must then ask what
it is that Obama is actually attempting to do? The answer to this
question, if one believes that he actually understands the Islamic
mindset, is beyond troubling. It becomes exponentially more troubling as
one digs far beneath the official narratives of White House Press
Secretary Jay Carney, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and U.N.
Ambassador Susan Rice.
It is here that one must have a very
good understanding of history, and not the history shaped by the influx
of Petrodollars into American academia. It is extremely important to
understand that since the 1970′s, our universities have been saturated
with money provided by Arab and Muslim elites. By influencing the
students and educators coming from these universities and redefining
history, the whole of society, including politicians and journalists are
thusly influenced. From the early 1970′s forward, Middle East studies
overtook schools and universities, teaching a false historical doctrine
that eventually shaped our foreign policy and how the current generation
of journalists report on Muslim and Middle East issues.
This, combined with the agenda of global
elites, especially the Progressives and those on the far left, resulted
in the stifling of any historical understanding of the global Islamic
Caliphate. Understanding history and exploiting American’s intellectual
paralysis, compliments of a media staffed by the new generation of
journalists and infiltrated by globalist facilitators, the globalists
saw 2008 as the time to roll out an already well-groomed Barack Hussein
Obama, a self-proclaimed citizen of the world, as the leader of the free
world. The actual and perceived failures of the Bush administration’s
foreign policy, itself influenced by oil and the coziness that only
Petrodollars could buy, set the stage for Obama. Finally, the events put
into motion decades ago, propelled by the 9/11 attacks, could be
cultivated to advance their idea of a New World Order, or a singular
system of international rule.
To accomplish this system of global
governance, it would be necessary to change the geopolitical landscape
of the Middle East. Hold-outs for national independence and sovereignty
would have to be removed, such as Mubarak in Egypt and Gaddafi in Libya.
Without the preoccupation of a cold war enemy, the globalists and the
Islamic fundamentalists united in a common goal: to usurp the
sovereignty and independence of nations filled with Islamic
fundamentalists held at bay by their despotic leaders. This was done
under the thinly veiled pretext of advancing human rights and promoting
democracy where none had ever existed and never could. The pretext is
able to exist due to the lack of honest scrutiny by a complicit media.
Moreover, few Americans have the ability to challenge the official
narrative, thanks to the revisionist history taught in schools and
universities, compliments of the Arab and Muslim elite.
With the promise of re-establishing an
Islamic Caliphate in the region known as the Greater Middle East, or the
area from Morocco to Afghanistan, Obama inked a deal with the Muslim
Brotherhood as a means to clear the path for a global system of
governance. He brought in the Muslim Brotherhood to all areas of our
government to collude with the globalists and communists already firmly
rooted in our government and our media. The allegiance of both the
secular globalists and Islamic fundamentalists working to re-establish a
Caliphate promises them all a seat at the globalist table, yet they
fail to understand that they are dining with scorpions.
The Obama doctrine, it would appear, is
one of orchestrated deconstruction of countries getting in the way of
the reconstruction of the Islamic Caliphate. Once established, the
Islamic Caliphate will usher in a repressive global religion
complimentary to the larger globalist agenda. Accordingly, Syria cannot
be allowed to exist in its current form, nor can Israel, but for
different reasons. We witnessed this doctrine in action in Egypt and
Libya, with the spoils going to a cabal of international bankers backing
the plan.
The Obama doctrine of foreign policy is
the globalist doctrine, except the Obama doctrine employs the effective
use of the Muslim Brotherhood to advance the globalist agenda. This
explains the seemingly schizophrenic policies in play by Obama and those
signed on to his agenda on both sides of the political spectrum.
Ending with the big lie
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep
repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be
maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from
the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus
becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to
repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus
by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” That quote
is attributed to Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s minister of propaganda, and a
monster with a deep contempt for humanity.
It is easy to see the quote in action
today. Simply look at the narratives pushed by Obama and his minions,
and other politicos on all sides of the political divide. Obviously,
Obama does not have exclusivity to its use, but he certainly has
mastered it. He has been helped by an American academia that has been
infiltrated long enough to produce a generation intellectually hobbled
in history, and a media so enamored by a messianic persona manufactured
by a cabal of globalists that it is collectively blind to their own
coming demise.
It is sad that Ambassador Christopher
Stevens met his own demise at the hands of the very people he truly
thought were his friends. One can even relate to the mindset of
Ambassador Stevens, as he was the product of the same doctrine that led
to his demise. In the end, however, we must realize that we will meet
the same fate if we do not understand that what we’ve been told, and
what we continue to be told, is a big lie that is being repeated at the
behest of the globalist elite.
Arab Spring was never spontaneous, but
carefully planned and orchestrated It is not about freeing repressed
nations, but conquering them. It is not about democracy, but about
destroying their sovereignty and replacing one oppressor with another.
It’s about taking the spoils and lining the pockets of those bankrolling
the operations. It’s just one phase in a series of phases. It’s about
reinstituting the Islamic Caliphate that ruled until European mandates
ended its reign, and using it as a means to a larger end. Again, who
better than Barack Hussein Obama, as ruler of the free world, to usher
in the new Caliphate?
The globalist table is being set. The
plans are order from chaos – engineered chaos. The “New World Order” has
been defined, and its plans are in progress. Barack Hussein Obama has
been selected as the one to usher in the new age of global governance.
Backroom deals have been made by those who believe they will have a seat
at that table. However, most will not sit at that table. Like the frog,
they will take their final breaths underneath a scorpion.
In Pursuit of the Truth...
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment