   |
  
Follow the Middle
East Forum
|
||||
|
Please take a moment to
visit and log in at the subscriber
area, and submit your city & country location. We will use this
information in future to invite you to any events that we organize in your
area.
The Collective Punishment of Egypt's Christian Copts
  Be the first of your
friends to like this.The sectarian crisis in the village of Dahshur escalated on August 1 after the burial of the Muslim man who died yesterday in hospital. Hundreds of Muslims torched and looted Coptic businesses and homes despite hundreds of security forces being deployed in the village. Eyewitnesses reported that security forces did not protect most Coptic property... "As 120 families had already fled the village the day before after being terrorized, the businesses and homes were an easy game for the mob to make a complete clean-up of everything that could be looted," said Coptic activist Wagih Jacob. "The security forces were at the scene of the crime while it was taking place and did nothing at all." After the violence, the family of the deceased Moaz Hasab-Allah said that destroying Coptic property is not enough and that Copts have to "pay for their son's death" with lives. Collectively punishing dhimmis—the barely tolerated non-Muslim infidels indigenous to the lands conquered by Islam—for the crimes of the individual is standard under Islam, and a regular occurrence among Egypt's native Christians. Other examples include:
·
Jan, 2012: A mob of over 3,000 Muslims attacked
Christians in an Alexandrian village because a Muslim accused a Christian
of having "intimate photos" of a Muslim woman on his phone.
Terrified, the Christian, who denied having such photos, turned himself in to
the police. Regardless, Coptic homes and shops were looted and set ablaze.
Three Christians were injured, while "terrorized" Christian women
and children, rendered homeless, stood in the streets with no place to go. As
usual, it took the army an hour to drive 2 kilometers to the village:
"This happens every time. They [security] wait outside the village until
the Muslims have had enough violence, then they appear." None of the
perpetrators were arrested. Later, in an effort to empty the village of its
62 Christian families, Muslims
attacked them again, burning more Coptic property. According to police,
the Muslim woman concerned has denied the whole story, and no photos were
found.
·
Nov, 2011: Similar to the above story in
Dahshur, the inadvertent killing of a Muslim by a Christian in a fight
started by the Muslim when he torched the Christian's home resulting in the
"collective
punishment of all Copts in the majority Christian village." Two
Christians not party to the altercation were killed; others were stabbed and
critically wounded. As usual, "after killing the Copts, Muslims went on
a rampage, looting and burning Christian owned homes and businesses."
Again as in Dahshur, despite all this "Muslims insist they have not yet
avenged" the death of their slain co-religionist; there were fears of
"a wholesale massacre of Copts." Once again, many Christians had
fled their homes and were in hiding.
·
Apr, 2011: When Muslims falsely blamed the
deaths of two Muslims on a Christian, one Christian was killed,
ten hospitalized, an old woman thrown out of her second floor balcony,
and Christian homes and properties plundered and torched.
·
Nov, 2010: When a teenage Christian youth was
accused of dating a teenage Muslim girl, 22 Christian homes were set ablaze to
Islam's war cry of "Allahu Akbar." During the attack the Muslim mob
threw fireballs, gasoline, and stones at Coptic homes and detonated Butane
Gas cylinders.
It is telling that in all the above examples, Christians were attacked
either because 1) they fought back against Muslims or because 2) they were
rumored to have relationships with Muslim women. In fact, both of these are
banned. Among the many stipulations Christians had to agree to when they
capitulated to the invading armies of Islam in the 7th century, and as
captured in the Pact of Omar, was never to raise their hands against a
Muslim—even if the latter was the aggressor—and never to have relations with
Muslim women. If they failed to follow these rules as well as many others,
their lives—and the lives of their surrounding coreligionists—became forfeit.As Mark Durie points out in his book on dhimmitude, The Third Choice: "Even a breach by a single individual dhimmi could result in jihad being enacted against the whole community. Muslim jurists have made this principle explicit, for example, the Yemeni jurist al-Murtada wrote that 'The agreement will be canceled if all or some of them break it' and the Moroccan al-Maghili taught 'The fact that one individual (or one group) among them has broken the statute is enough to invalidate it for all of them.'" Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center and an Associate Fellow at the Middle East Forum. |
|||||
|
To subscribe to the MEF mailing lists, go to http://www.meforum.org/list_subscribe.php |
|||||
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment