|
In this mailing:
UK:
Child Sex Slavery, Multiculturalism and Islam
|
|
|
|
Share:  
|
  Be the first of
your friends to like this.
"[T]he agencies responsible
for child-protection have almost entirely failed in their job to protect
vulnerable children. From a fear of being called 'racist,' police forces
across the country have buried the evidence.... Political correctness
would be used to make sure that people did not speak about this
phenomenon." — from Easy Meat: Multiculturalism, Islam and Child
Sex Slavery
"[A] 2010 document by the
Rotherham Safeguarding Children Board stated that, 'great care will be
taken in drafting…this report to ensure that its findings embrace
Rotherham's qualities of diversity. It is imperative that discussions of
a wider cultural phenomenon are avoided.'" — from Easy Meat:
Multiculturalism, Islam and Child Sex Slavery
British authorities enforcing political correctness have allowed
Muslim paedophile gangs to sexually abuse children with impunity for more
than two decades, according to a comprehensive new study that examines
the harrowing epidemic of child grooming in
towns and cities across Britain.
The meticulously documented report, entitled, "Easy
Meat: Multiculturalism, Islam and Child Sex Slavery," shows how
officials in England and Wales were aware of rampant child grooming—the
process by which sexual predators befriend and build trust with children
in order to prepare them for abuse—by Muslim gangs since at least 1988.
Rather than taking steps to protect British children, however, police,
social workers, teachers, neighbors, politicians and the media
deliberately downplayed the severity of the crimes perpetrated by the
grooming gangs in order to avoid being accused of
"Islamophobia" or racism.
The conspiracy of silence was not broken until November 2010, when it
was leaked that police in Derbyshire had carried out an undercover
investigation—dubbed Operation
Retriever—and arrested 13 members of a Muslim gang for grooming up to
100 underage girls for sex.
|
Seven members of
a child sex grooming gang in Oxford who were found guilty in 2013
(clockwise from top left): Kamar Jamil, Akhtar Dogar, Anjum Dogar,
Assad Hussain, Mohammed Karrar, Bassam Karrar, and Zeeshan Ahmed.
They were sentenced to a combined 95 years in prison for raping,
torturing and trafficking British girls as young as 11.
|
Shortly thereafter, the Times of London published
the results of a groundbreaking investigation into the sexual
exploitation and internal trafficking of girls in the Midlands and the
north of England. In January 2011, the newspaper reported that in 17
court cases since 1997 in which groups of men were prosecuted for
grooming 11 to 16 year old girls, 53 of the 56 men found guilty were
Asian, 50 of them Muslim, and just three were white.
In September 2012, the Times published
another exposé that revealed the hidden truth about the sale and
extensive use of British children for sex. The article showed that
organized groups of Muslim men were able to groom, pimp and traffic girls
across the country with virtual impunity. Although offenders were
identified to police, they were not prosecuted. A child welfare expert
interviewed by the newspaper said the government's reluctance to tackle
such street grooming networks represented "the biggest child
protection scandal of our time."
But the latest study—which avoids sensational details and confines
itself to exposing where officialdom has failed—demonstrates that even
the coverage in the Times has understated the scale of the
problem:
"There is far more to this story than has come out so far. The
population are already outraged by what they have learned in the last
year or two, but know only a fraction of the scandal... This massive
over-representation of Muslim men in this crime spree has been borne out
by the prosecutions of the last three to four years, but it is clear that
it must have been known long ago and should have been made public.
Because the predators were Muslims, the agencies responsible for child-protection
have almost entirely failed in their job to protect vulnerable children.
From a fear of being called 'racist,' police forces across the country
have buried the evidence."
"On the rare occasion when the phenomenon [of child grooming]
would be discussed in more than the briefest details, political activists
and the authorities would come together to stop the public from knowing
more. Political correctness would be used to make sure that people did
not speak about this phenomenon, enabling the perpetrators free rein to
sexually abuse schoolgirls for decades. Yes, decades. We know that
in an age where parents are not allowed to smack their children, this
sounds unbelievable."
The report shows that even documents that supposedly address the
problem of child grooming have gone out of their way to avoid discussing
why some "ethnic groups" are massively over-represented as
perpetrators—the study calculates that Muslims are 154 times more likely
to be perpetrators of these crimes than non-Muslims—while the schoolgirl
victims are overwhelmingly of a different ethnic group.
"The perpetrators have been overwhelmingly men from Muslim
communities, and the victims have been overwhelmingly girls from
non-Muslim communities (Sikhs, Christians and Atheists). Yet the professionals
never deemed it important to declare this, or even denied the pattern
existed."
"Despite government agencies in Rotherham [a large town in South
Yorkshire, England] knowing about (and privately discussing) the Muslim
grooming gangs from 1996, a 2010 document by Rotherham Safeguarding
Children Board stated that 'great care will be taken in drafting…this
report to ensure that its findings embrace Rotherham's qualities of
diversity. It is imperative that suggestions of a wider cultural
phenomenon are avoided.'"
One of the defining features of child grooming is the ethnic/cultural
homogeneity of the gang members, and the refusal of other members of
their community to speak out about them or to condemn their behavior.
According to the report, the gangs are often made up of brothers and
members of their extended family, many from Pakistan, who take part in
the grooming and/or rape of the schoolgirls.
The report states that grooming gangs target young girls, aged between
11 and 16, because the gang members want virgins and girls who are free
of sexual diseases. "Most of the men buying sex with the girls have
Muslim wives and they don't want to risk infection," the report
states. "The younger you look, the more saleable you are."
"The schoolgirls they target are overwhelmingly non-Muslim, while
the gangs are overwhelmingly Muslim. The girls are often lured into the
clutches of the gang using a young Muslim man who befriends/seduces the
girl. None of this is accidental; here we are not talking about cross-cultural
romantic relationships. What is so unusual about this disparity in
ethnicity, is that mostly Muslims in Britain have little or no
interaction with the indigenous population."
The scale of the problem is truly horrifying. According to Parents against Child Sexual Exploitation
(PACE), a national charity focused on working with the victims of child
grooming and their families, at least 10,000 British children are in the
clutches of the gangs at any one time, and at least 1,000 new girls are
being groomed by gangs each year.
But this is "just the tip of the iceberg," according to a document
published by the House of Commons, which estimates that at least
20,000 British children are at risk of sexual exploitation by grooming
gangs.
Meanwhile, prosecutions are few and far between. The report calculates
that for every man convicted of such crimes, there are between two to ten
other men who were directly implicated, but for whom there was
insufficient evidence to secure a conviction. "If this is
true," the authors write, "it means that with this crime there
are very many perpetrators getting away with it."
Finally, the authors of the report examine the links between Islamic
culture and doctrine and the crime of child grooming. They note:
"There is not one case where it was non-Muslim men grooming
Muslim girls, and that despite the fact that 95% of the men in Britain
are not Muslims…There is no evidence at all that non-Muslim men are
grooming Muslim children, but ample evidence that Muslim men are
directing their grooming at non-Muslim schoolgirls."
At the same time, "the notion that Islam could be the basis for
this criminality is always ruled out of the question, with no
investigation of Islamic theology, the history of Islam, or the rulings
of Sharia law."
The authors then provide a thorough examination of Islamic sacred
texts (pp. 222-268) and conclude, among other observations:
1) "The laws in various Islamic states show that they think that
Aisha [who was married to Mohammad at the age of six] was under 10 when
Mohammed had sex with her. And to Muslims, Mohammed is regarded as the
perfect man; it is part of their religion that they should emulate his
behavior."
2) "Muslim men are taught in mosques that women are second-class
citizens, little more than chattels or possessions over whom they have
absolute authority."
3) "The Koran makes a distinction between legal wives and slaves,
and instructs Muslim men that they can have sex with either their wives
or their slaves."
4) "Not only are Muslim men permitted legally and morally to rape
their slaves, but they are also forgiven if they turn a slave girl into a
prostitute."
5) "There are also features of Islam which are supremacist and
which look with contempt at non-Muslims."
6) "The Hadiths also permit Muslims to rape women who are
captured after a battle (whereupon they become the property of Muslims,
that is, they become slaves)."
At the same time, British judges are increasingly using Islamic Sharia
law to justify light sentences for Muslims who rape underage girls:
"As late as May 2013, the media were reporting that a Muslim man
in Nottingham who had 'raped' an underage girl, was spared a prison term
after the judge heard that the naïve 18-year-old attended an Islamic
faith school where he was taught that women are worthless. Rashid told
psychologists he had no idea that having sex with a willing 13-year-old
was against the law; besides, his education had taught him to believe
that 'women are no more worthy than a lollipop that has been dropped on
the ground.'"
The report is emphatic in blaming the doctrine of multiculturalism for
Britain's lack of resolve in confronting the grooming gangs:
"Multiculturalism is a fundamentally incoherent doctrine,
invented to conceal the serious conflicts which have arisen when peoples
from vastly different cultures, with different values, are forced to live
together."
"Political correctness and the doctrine of multiculturalism meant
that the professionals whose job it was to help the vulnerable were
consciously commanding that these diverse cultural values could not be
discussed."
"Multiculturalism came about in order to deny that there is any
significance to cultures having different values and to conceal that
there will be conflict when these incompatible values come together.
Political correctness is the means by which such denial is
enforced."
"Those who propound and defend multiculturalism say that people
from different cultural backgrounds have different values, and that we
must all accept these values as being of equal validity. But when it
comes to examining what those different values are, multiculturalists
suddenly lose interest in the details of these differences and lose
interest in the consequences that follow from these different values. Yet
we have seen, that even those Muslims who are classified as liberal or
moderate have views which would be considered extreme if those views were
espoused by a non-Muslim in Britain. Are we really surprised that
conflicts and problems arise when communities with different values are
living side-by-side? These conflicts are just concealed by the advocates
of multiculturalism. Proponents of multiculturalism dare not examine the
views of Islamic fundamentalists, that (significant) minority of Muslims
in Britain who want Sharia law."
"Multiculturalists think that Muslims will embrace
multiculturalism; yet Islam was established 1,300 years ago to destroy
multiculturalism."
"Islamic society is a totalitarian society, all other values are
to be subordinated to Islamic values. But if anyone in Britain dares to
criticize Islam, they will be denounced and told they live in a
multicultural society, and must accept these totalitarian values."
The report concludes: "Every decade, the Muslim population of
Britain almost doubles in size, so there is every reason to believe that
without some massive changes in our society, the activities of these
gangs will grow and grow."
Soeren Kern is a
Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute.
He is also Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo
de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group. Follow him on Facebook and on
Twitter.
European
Elections Turn Nasty
|
|
|
|
Share:
|
Be the first of
your friends to like this.
Geert Wilders's political
opponents called on those who felt "insulted" by Wilders to
press criminal charges against him. The police have facilitated such
complaints by providing pre-filled "Wilders forms" and offering
to come to people's homes if they intend to press charges, rather than
having them come to the police station as is normal. The aim is clearly
to bog Wilders down in costly court court cases, perhaps for years.
Smear campaigns are currently going on against Nigel Farage and Geert
Wilders, Europe's two most outspoken defendants of national sovereignty.
The reason is obvious: the upcoming elections for the European Parliament
on May 22nd and May 25th. In these elections, the
citizens of the 28 member states of the European Union [EU] will decide
whether or not they want to see their nation-states evaporate into a sort
of United States of Europe ruled by the unelected, unaccountable and
untransparent EU bureaucracy in Brussels.
The European political elite is trying to transform the EU, which started
in 1957 as a vehicle for free trade and economic cooperation, into one
Union to rule them all – a genuine pan-European state. This
transformation process has been going on for decades, despite the clear
opposition in many ancient European nations, whose people refuse to be
reduced to provinces of a supra-national superstate.
Early last week, opinion polls in Austria, France, Denmark, Britain,
the Netherlands and other countries, reaffirmed that parties opposing the
EU project are set to become the biggest winners in May. However, while
many of these parties want a less ambitious EU, two parties in particular
– the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) in Britain and the Party
for Freedom (PVV) in the Netherlands – advocate a downright exit of their
respective nations from the EU. UKIP and the PVV are convinced that the
very nature of the EU is flawed. Indeed, according to its 1957 preamble,
the EU's purpose is the forging of "an ever closer union"
between its member states.
In his speech at
UKIP's party conference, last February 28th, Nigel Farage
called his party "the patriotic fightback" and emphasized the
importance of the coming elections. "This is it, this is the big one
for UKIP," he said. With a predicted 30% of the votes, UKIP would
become Britain's
largest party, defeating Labour with 28% and the governing
Conservatives with 21%. Farage warned his supporters, however, that the
entire establishment, the major political parties, the media, the trade
unions, and even some big banks and multinationals, will try to do
everything to prevent UKIP from winning.
And, indeed, barely two weeks after his speech, the British media were
depicting Mr. Farage as an entirely untrustworthy fellow. It was alleged
that he had an extramarital affair with his spokeswoman. These malicious
stories, though spread by the woman who had earlier been passed over for
the very job of UKIP spokesperson, were eagerly printed by the media.
Some papers pontificated that Farage's love life would be his
undoing at May's Euro elections.
In other stories, UKIP was described
as a "freak show," its headquarters in London as a
"zoo" where people bring animals into the office, take their
clothes off and have sex on their minds instead of politics. The smear
campaign was successful to the effect that it forced Farage's spokeswoman,
in an attempt "to get her life back," to quit
her job in the middle of UKIP's most important electoral campaign
ever. The smear campaign, however, disgusted The Guardian, a
leftist newspaper otherwise fiercely critical of UKIP, so much that it
wrote: "You don't have to be a fan of Nigel Farage to object to
this style of politics. It's personal, lowest common denominator,
play-the-man-not-the-ball nonsense."
The anti-Farage smear campaign, however, is nothing compared with the
smear campaign currently going on against PVV leader Geert Wilders in The
Netherlands. At first this campaign was strikingly similar to the one
against Farage, with stories of an alleged affair of Wilders with his
pretty former press secretary. It turned nastier early last week when a video
clip was released of a Dutch rapper of Moroccan origin, showing a
Wilders lookalike being abducted by armed men, forced to kneel before an
al-Qaeda flag and being executed. Mr. Wilders, who is at the top of an
al-Qaeda hit list for his criticism of Islam, has been living under
constant police protection for almost ten years.
|
A Geert Wilders
lookalike is about to be executed by jihadists in this still image
captured from a music video by Dutch-Moroccan rapper Hozny.
|
But the dirt really hit the fan last Wednesday after a PVV rally for
the Dutch municipal elections in The Hague, where Wilders said that he
wanted "fewer Moroccans." In The Hague, as in Amsterdam and
Rotterdam, non-Western immigrants – mostly Moroccans – already make up
over one-third of the population, and almost half of the population under
21 years of age. Moreover, Moroccan criminality is a huge problem in the
Netherlands.
Moroccans top the Dutch crime statistics.
They are 5 times more involved in vandalism, 6 times more in violence,
and 22 times more in robbery than indigenous Dutch. Two years ago,
Diederik Samsom, leader of the governing Labour Party, said that
Moroccans have an "ethnic monopoly on trouble" in the
Netherlands. They are also overrepresented among those who live on
welfare benefits. As the cost to the Dutch taxpayer of accommodating the
number of Moroccans is enormous, the PVV has proposed to reduce these
numbers by adopting three measures. First, stopping all immigration from
Islamic countries. Second, promoting voluntary repatriation. And third,
depriving criminals with dual nationality of their Dutch nationality and
sending them back to the country of their other nationality.
These proposals have been on the PVV party platform for years, but led
to an outburst of indignation when Wilders asked his followers three
questions at Wednesday's party. He asked them whether they wanted to have
less or more Brussels, less or more Labour Party and fewer or more
Moroccans.
Media outlets at once compared Wilders to Nazi
leaders such as Hitler and Goebbels. Schools began to issue
guidelines to instruct pupils on how to deal
with Wilders. His political opponents, including Prime Minister Mark
Rutte and Justice Minister Ivo Opstelten demanded that Wilders retract
his statements or face serious political and judicial consequences.
They called on those who felt "insulted" by Wilders to press
criminal charges of discrimination against him. The police have
facilitated such complaints by providing
pre-filled "Wilders forms" and offering to come to people's
homes if they intend to press criminal charges, rather than having
them come to the police station, as is the normal procedure. The aim
clearly is to bog the politician Wilders down in costly court cases for
weeks and months, perhaps even years, to come.
People who attended Wilders's rally have
received threats and local PVV politicians supporting their party
leader also had charges
pressed against them. The pressure against other PVV politicians and
their families has led to the departure of two of the 14 PVV
parliamentarians, one of the four PVV members of the European Parliament,
and several provincial and municipal councilors.
Last Saturday, 5,000 people demonstrated against Wilders in Amsterdam.
The Amsterdam mayor, a member of the Labour Party, led the demonstrators
who shouted: "We are all Moroccans." Some of the demonstrators
were carrying
the black
al-Qaida flag. Others carried slogans such as "Wilders
hond van Israel", which literally means "Wilders dog of
Israel." Calling someone a dog is an Islamic insult.
On Sunday morning, Dutch state television broadcasted a church
service against Wilders. An opinion
poll released on Sunday, showed that the affair has cost Wilders his
leading position in the polls. The biggest Dutch party is now the Liberal
Democratic Party, which is fervently pro-EU. A sigh of relief can be
heard in Brussels.
|
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment