Friday, March 28, 2014

ACT! FOR CANADA NEWSLETTER - MARCH 28, 2014

 photo ACTCANNewLogo_zps9a4d1228-1.jpg


“Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance.
If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant,
if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the
onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed,
and tolerance with them.”

~ Karl Popper ~
This is going to be an increasingly common feature of life in the West. The U.S., Britain and other countries have all expressed concern about Muslims returning home after waging jihad in Syria. One or more of them are going to use their training back home eventually. It never seems to occur to officials that perhaps after waging jihad terror elsewhere they shouldn’t be allowed to return.
Canada: Family fights to stop Sharia Law in public spaces
A Halifax family is taking their fight against Sharia Law to Parliament. They want the feds to stop giving taxpayers cash to places like schools and rec centres unless the organizations vow to stop allowing gender segregation under the guise of multiculturalism.

A Saudi man who admitted to choking and threatening his daughter has been ordered by a Newfoundland judge to leave Canada or face arrest.
Provincial Court Judge James Walsh handed down a suspended sentence with a year’s probation Tuesday on condition that 56-year-old Khalaf Alshaek leave the country immediately or otherwise face arrest. Walsh said cultural differences offer an explanation for what happened, but do not justify the actions taken.
Toronto man told undercover officer it was ‘God’s Will’ for him join terror-group Al-Shabab, trial hears
A Toronto security guard on trial for allegedly attempting to join the Somali terrorist group Al-Shabab said he believed it was his religious duty to do so, an undercover police officer testified on Tuesday. “It’s the ultimate sacrifice you can make for your religion,” Mohamed Hassan Hersi said, according to the testimony of the officer, whose identity cannot be disclosed  due to a publication ban. “Basically it’s God’s will.” “Here everything is anti-prayer, anti-Islam … even if it’s a tyrannical place, it’s better than Canada,” he said. “I want to live in a place that’s better than this.” Somalia was better than Canada, he said, “because you can live in a place where there’s Islamic law.”
In Canada, we’re Canadians, so why are our politicians singing Greek and Pakistani national anthems?
“As for politicians: Please, I beg you, salute only one flag in Canada, the Canadian flag. Also, sing only one national anthem — O Canada”
When Canadians are encouraged to sing the national anthem of another country they or their parents left to seek a new life in Canada, that crosses the line. What is worse, politicians fall into this trap. For fear of losing vote banks to their opponents, they end up encouraging those who are, unwittingly, diluting the essence of Canadian citizenship. Yet there they were, hoisting the flag of a country from which close to 4,000 Islamist militants have gone to fight the jihad in Syria.
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled last week that Iranian funds in Canadian bank accounts and two properties in Toronto and Ottawa should be seized and split among terror victims. The newspaper said the judgement came after Iran failed to defend itself in court and sheriffs were ordered to take the Iranian assets. The groundbreaking court decision finalized four lawsuits filed in Ontario, Nova Scotia and British Columbia by terror victims seeking damages from Iran for training, arming and financing Hamas, in Gaza, and Lebanon-based Hezbollah, the National Post said.

European Elections Turn Nasty
Smear campaigns are currently going on against Nigel Farage and Geert Wilders, Europe's two most outspoken defendants of national sovereignty. The reason is obvious: the upcoming elections for the European Parliament on May 22nd and May 25th. In these elections, the citizens of the 28 member states of the European Union [EU] will decide whether or not they want to see their nation-states evaporate into a sort of United States of Europe ruled by the unelected, unaccountable and untransparent EU bureaucracy in Brussels.
The growing European hostility toward the Jewish state is well publicized, as is the corresponding European support for the Palestinians and their agenda. The Palestinian Authority’s largest funder is not the oil-rich and supposedly sympathetic Arab world. It is not even the United States. No, despite its own critical financial situation, the largest single funder of the dubious Fatah-run mini-state in the West Bank is the European Union. More noteworthy still is the way this funding is also being used by one particularly hostile and activist NGO to even pursue Canada, a close of ally of Israel, at the UN.
What Is Agenda 21? After Watching This, You May Not Want to Know by Tiffany Gabbay
In so many words, the United Nations seeks to co-opt, via individual governments, and eventually, a “one-world government,” privately held land under the auspices of ensuring its “sustainability.” Worse still, the UN’s Agenda 21 has even laid out plans for “depopulation” or rather, “population control.” If it sounds like something out of George Orwell’s 1984, that is because Agenda 21′s tenets are eerily in line with the demented alternate reality Orwell himself had imagined while scribing the pages of his famed novel.

 photo march281_zps51e25dc4.jpg

Sharia Law to be enshrined in British legal system
Islamic law is to be effectively enshrined in the British legal system for the first time under guidelines for solicitors on drawing up “Sharia compliant” wills. Under ground-breaking guidance, produced by The Law Society, High Street solicitors will be able to write Islamic wills that deny women an equal share of inheritances and exclude unbelievers altogether. The documents, which would be recognised by Britain’s courts, will also prevent children born out of wedlock – and even those who have been adopted – from being counted as legitimate heirs.

Lessons from Leaving Islamic Tyranny
I have observed that many Muslims, who were born or grew up in the United States while enjoying freedom of speech, expression, assembly and whom this country has given shelter and a home, frequently judge the United States based on the Quran, Allah, Muhammad, and their Islamic ideals, not based on the Constitution or democratic principles and human rights. It seems that the answer is that if you do not like (or even hate) how the United States is structured and how the society functions, then you can return to your Islamic country of origin. No one is forcing you to stay here. If one is so angry and frustrated with the un-Islamic character of the United States, with how Americans live, drink, dance, listen to music, have parties, work and how the social values contradict Islamic principles, then they can return to their Islamic country, where Islamic social values are respected, ingrained and indoctrinated into every cell of the society and political structure.
U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations – Trojan Horse, Establishing U.S. Jihadist Political Party
Last week a new Muslim coalition debuted, calling itself the U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations. While most media types ignored the story, at least one knowledgeable commentator, Dr. Zuhdi Jasser – a devout secular Muslim - got it spot on:  The USCMO "should be looked at as a circling of the wagons of the inner core of American Islamist organizations…If they were going to start an American Islamist political party those would be the founders. Instead they deceive Americans as an innocent 'Muslim coalition’.
Trouble with the Law? Just Plead "Islam"
Just like everyone else living under the rule of law, if we Muslims are afraid of our community "passing judgement" on us, we should not be committing crimes in the first place. Also, as we Muslims here have chosen to live in the West, we should abide by its rules. Nobody is holding us here against our will. What differentiates civilized societies from others is the rule of the law, where everyone must abide by the rules or face consequences. Nonetheless, as a Muslim living in the West, I have come to see that many of my fellow Muslims living in the West seem to expect a free pass when they break the law by using their religion as an excuse.
Why ‘Moderate Islam’ is an Oxymoron

At a time when terrorism committed in the name of Islam is rampant, we are continuously being assured—especially by three major institutions that play a dominant role in forming the Western mindset, namely, mainstream media, academia, and government—that the sort of Islam embraced by “radicals,” “jihadis,” and so forth, has nothing to do with “real” Islam.
When Terrorists Become Pharmacists

Do you know where your medications come from? It might be from an international terrorist drug ring. A new study from the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism finds that terror group Hezbollah is “already involved in manufacturing and distributing counterfeit medications.” Institute director Boaz Ganor says that “Hezbollah is liable to use its production centers, international smuggling and distribution networks, and ties to international crime syndicates to insert deadly fake drugs into the pharmaceuticals market.”

http://rare.us/story/when-terrorists-become-pharmacists/


Beating the Mohammed Meme
If the Western news media were to educate itself on Islam and familiarize itself with Mohammed's bloody and horrific legacy of 1,400 years of jihadist violence and expansionism, then those very same news sources might consider deleting the prophet in Mohammed.  The life and legacy of Mohammed prove that he is not to be considered a prophet in the West, but only a prophet in Islam -- a totalitarian ideology that poses the greatest threat to freedom, equality, and the human race.  Islam could never have advanced as it has today without Western indifference and ignorance.
This was the safest hotel in Kabul, where UN workers, journalists, and foreign diplomats stayed. The gunmen got in because of a lapse in security: probably someone who was sympathetic to the Taliban’s jihad got onto the security staff. After all, there is absolutely no way to prevent such a thing. A total of nine were killed the foreigners that died were from Canada, India, New Zealand and Pakistan, the interior ministry said.
OBAMA LOVES ISLAM: Christianity, Eh. Not So Much‏
20 Quotes by Barack Obama about Islam and Christianity.
The Historical Reality of the Muslim Conquests

In an early edition of the venerable Encyclopaedia of Islam on the definition of jihad, its opening sentence simply states, “The spread of Islam by arms is a religious duty upon Muslims in general.… Jihad must continue to be done until the whole world is under the rule of Islam.… Islam must completely be made over before the doctrine of jihad [warfare to spread Islam] can be eliminated.” Muslim legal manuals written in Arabic are even more explicit.

VIDEOS
Great Britain is a Society of Cowards, says Pat Condell. Isn’t Canada too?
Stephen Coughlin on the Islamist subversion of the U.S. Government

ACT! FOR CANADA
The news items, blogs, educational materials and other information in our emails and on our website are only intended to provide information, news and commentary on events and issues related to the threat of radical Islam. Much of this information is based upon media sources, such as the AP wire services, newspapers, magazines, books, online news blog and news services, and radio and television, which we deem to be reliable. However, we have undertaken no independent investigation to verify the accuracy of the information reported by these media sources. We therefore disclaim all liability for false or inaccurate information from these media sources. We also disclaim all liability for the third-party information that may be accessed through the material referenced in our emails or posted on our website.
This newsletter is not the official newsletter or communication of ACT! for America, Inc. This newsletter is independently operated by ACT! for Canada named on this communication. The statements, positions, opinions and views expressed in this website, whether written, audible, or video, are those of the individuals and organizations making them and do not necessarily represent the positions, views, and opinions of ACT! for America, Inc. or ACT! for Canada, its directors, officers, or agents.

No comments:

Post a Comment