Monday, January 19, 2015

"In Defense of Europe's So-called Far Right" - Pipes in NRO, #1384


Daniel Pipes
Homepage   |   Articles   |    Blog


Join Daniel Pipes on a trip to Israel's Negev desert, ​with side visits to explore​ the recent Gaza war. For more information, please click here.
Dear Reader:
The deadline is fast approaching to sign up for the fact-finding expedition I will lead in April-May.
It will include an in-depth study of the Negev desert, its role in Israeli life and, by extension, its connections to Egypt and Jordan. Although our focus is on Bedouins and Israel's national security, the itinerary also takes us to historic, religious, and cultural sites, including Jerusalem's Temple Mount and the Dead Sea.
The size of the group will be limited to 25 people so that each participant will have individual attention from me and the tour organizers.
If interested, please take these steps:
1. Review the details at http://neg.heritagestudyprograms.com/. Address any questions to the trip organizer, Roni Wexler at HSP613@gmail.com
2. Should you decide to join, go to http://www.gate1travel.com/hsppipes2015.aspx, fill out the form, and make a deposit. Again, for assistance with booking, write Roni Wexler at HSP613@gmail.com
Yours sincerely,
Daniel Pipes

In Defense of Europe's So-called Far Right

by Daniel Pipes
The Washington Times
January 19, 2015
Be the first of your friends to like this.
Last week, the government of France sponsored a national solidarity rally in which a great array of foreign leaders and all domestic political parties joined together in a "sacred union" (a term that recalls World War I) against the massacres at Charlie Hebdo magazine and the kosher market.
Make that all the political parties except one -- the National Front (NF) headed by Marine Le Pen, ostensibly excluded because it does not subscribe to "republican values." In reality, it was barred because, uniquely among French political parties, it opposes immigration; and French politicians fear that the NF will gain massive new support in the aftermath of the recent massacres.
The Paris attacks got Marine le Pen invited to the meet the French president but not to march in his parade.
Although myself a classical liberal with libertarian tendencies, in the center of the Republican party in the United States, I welcome the strengthening of the National Front and many of the other parties vilified as being on the "far right." Here is why:
Granted, some European parties actually have a fascistic quality, in particular Golden Dawn in Greece and Jobbik in Hungary. But the others being maligned are in fact populist and insurgent, often with leftist economic programs, especially concerning the welfare state. They are creatively centrist, forming a novel combination that draws on right and left in both their policies and their supporters. They represent the healthy, normal, legitimate, and constructive response of a people under stress. Moreover, they address what's on many minds.
Some Greeks express themselves about the other populist concern: the European Union.
For example, in the case of the latest atrocities, Le Pen was, as usual, the only French leader boldly to come out and identify their cause: "We are fighting an ideology, that of Islamist fundamentalism." In contrast, President François Hollande blatantly lied: "Those who committed these acts, these fanatics, have nothing to do with the Muslim faith." (His prime minister, Manuel Valls, did a bit better: "We make war … against radical Islam.")
In addition to the NF in France, similar parties include the United Kingdom Independence Party, the Swiss People's Party, the Freedom Party of Austria, Alternative for Germany, the Danish People's Party, the Progress Party (Norway), the Sweden Democrats, the Finns Party, and – leading the pack – the Party for Freedom (Netherlands), founded by Geert Wilders, whom I consider to be Europe's most important politician.
PEGIDA has organized large demonstrations in Germany, especially in Dresden.
Two concerns top their agendas: the European Union and Islamism. The EU arouses negative responses for a variety of reasons – the British want out, the Germans want to spend less on others, the Greeks want less austerity: all feel oppressed by the supra-national experiment that began modestly in 1951 as the European Coal and Steel Community. Only well-salaried EU bureaucrats and the well-off, buffered from the realities of everyday life, argue that things are just fine.
On Islamism, the response across Europe is unified. From Spain to Norway, one hears about too many immigrants, too much accommodation, too many privileges, too many social pathologies, too much Islamic supremacism, too much Shari'a (Islamic law), and too much violence. Increasing numbers of Europeans fear Islamism, grieve the loss of their traditional culture, and worry about their children's future.
Legacy parties, the media, and academics engage in a campaign of denigration, marginalization, and ostracism against these parties to place them beyond the pale, as though they were the new Nazis. This is dangerous and futile. Dangerous because, denied acceptability and deference, members of these parties will be more likely to express themselves through extremism and violence. Futile because the numbers in this legion are inexorably on the rise. For example, the Sweden Democrats have doubled their support in each of the past four elections. Survey research finds Le Pen and Wilders leading the polls in their respective countries. As they continue to gain new adherents, many will before long have an important voice in European countries.
Rather than engage in name-calling and attempts at exclusion, established institutions should encourage the populist parties to moderate, become more sophisticated, and fully participate in the political process. Although these tend to be undisciplined, with some paranoid and unacceptable elements, they're learning as they go, erratically becoming more reputable. Yes, many of them have dubious backgrounds – but so too do long-established parties in countries such as France and Sweden.
Whether welcome or not, the insurgents are coming. The future will be better for all concerned if they assume their expected role with the establishment's cooperation, not vilification. They deserve courtesy and respect.
Mr. Pipes (DanielPipes.org, @DanielPipes) is president of the Middle East Forum. © 2015 by Daniel Pipes. All rights reserved.
This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.

To subscribe to this list, go to http://www.danielpipes.org/list_subscribe.php
Sign up for related (but non-duplicating) e-mail services:
   Middle East Forum (articles and event reports)
   Campus Watch (articles, blog posts)
   Islamist Watch (articles, blog posts)
   Legal Project (articles, blog posts)
at http://www.danielpipes.org/list_subscribe.php

No comments:

Post a Comment