Friday, February 20, 2009

The 'Fairness Doctrine' and 'Islamophobia'

homelearnactlocal chaptersContact Congress







The “Fairness Doctrine”
and “Islamophobia”



Dear Solsticewitch13,

The so-called, and misnamed, “Fairness Doctrine,” is rearing its ugly head
again.

The Fairness Doctrine is a throwback to the day when there
were three broadcast channels on television. Its intent was to ensure that
FCC-regulated TV and radio outlets provided both sides of the story in
their news and commentary.

Those of us who remember how the three television networks controlled the
flow of news and information recall how “well” the “Fairness Doctrine”
worked. It was jettisoned during the Reagan Administration.

Certain members of Congress are clearly interested in reviving the Fairness
Doctrine. Given the glut of information one can get today on any issue
from virtually any political perspective, it’s hard to see why it’s necessary.

Unless they want to shut down “speech” they don’t like.

In the American Spectator piece below, we draw your attention to one
particularly chilling paragraph:


One idea Waxman's committee staff is looking at is a
congressionally mandated policy that would require all TV and radio
stations to have in place "advisory boards" that would act as watchdogs
to ensure "community needs and opinions" are given fair treatment.
Reports from those advisory boards would be used for license renewals
and summaries would be reviewed at least annually by FCC
staff.

It doesn’t take much imagination to see how such “advisory boards”
would be on the front lines in enforcing political correctness –
especially when it comes to the issue of Islam. Done, of course,
in the name of providing “fair treatment” – or else lose your
broadcast license.

If the Fairness Doctrine were revived, and with it anything that
smacks of “advisory boards,” we’d be handing over the power to
censor our TV and radio broadcasts to the Islamists who are
intent on gagging all speech that dares to criticize Islam.

They already have a UN resolution calling on countries to prohibit “hate
speech.” The British government cowers before their threats and deports
Dutch MP Geert Wilders. Austrian officials convict an Austrian legislator
for “defaming” Islam. Mark Steyn is dragged before the Canadian Human
Rights Commission to answer Muslim charges about what he wrote in his book
America Alone. And they already have much of the “establishment
media” parroting their talking points and readily labeling as an
“Islamophobe” anyone who criticizes Islam.

The Fairness Doctrine will be a nail in the coffin of free speech about Islam.
It’s time to draw a line in the sand.




DOCTRINE AIR DEMOCRACY

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/02/16/in-all-fairness/


Senior FCC staff working for acting Federal Communications
Commissioner Michael Copps held meetings last week with policy and
legislative advisers to House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry
Waxman to discuss ways the committee can create openings for the FCC to
put in place a form of the "Fairness Doctrine" without actually calling it
such.

Waxman is also interested, say sources, in looking at how
the Internet is being used for content and free speech purposes. "It's all
about diversity in media," says a House Energy staffer, familiar with the
meetings. "Does one radio station or one station group control four of the
five most powerful outlets in one community? Do four stations in one
region carry Rush Limbaugh, and nothing else during the same time slot?
Does one heavily trafficked Internet site present one side of an issue and
not link to sites that present alternative views? These are some of the
questions the chairman is thinking about right now, and we are going to
have an FCC that will finally have the people in place to answer them."


Copps will remain acting chairman of the FCC until President
Obama's nominee, Julius Genachowski, is confirmed, and Copps has
been told by the White House not create "problems" for the incoming
chairman by committing to issues or policy development before the Obama
pick arrives.

But Copps has been a supporter of putting in place
policies that would allow the federal government to have greater oversight
over the content that TV and radio stations broadcast to the public, and
both the FCC and Waxman are looking to licensing and renewal of licensing
as a means of enforcing "Fairness Doctrine" type policies without actually
using the hot-button term "Fairness Doctrine."

One idea Waxman's
committee staff is looking at is a congressionally mandated policy that
would require all TV and radio stations to have in place "advisory boards"
that would act as watchdogs to ensure "community needs and opinions" are
given fair treatment. Reports from those advisory boards would be used for
license renewals and summaries would be reviewed at least annually by FCC
staff.




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ACT for
America

P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591
www.actforamerica.org


ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated
to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots
citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to
informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies
that promote America’s national security and the defense of American
democratic values against the assault of radical Islam.
We are only as strong
as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential
to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more
secure.





HOW CAN I TELL OTHERS ABOUT YOUR ORGANIZATION?

Send a personalized version of this message to your friends.




HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR ORGANIZATION?
Click here to give an online donation.

No comments:

Post a Comment