Wednesday, February 25, 2009

from NY to Israel Sultan Reveals The Stories Behind the News

from NY to Israel Sultan Reveals
The Stories Behind the News

Chas
Freeman: "Help the Shiites win fast, consolidate their damn dictatorship
and get the hell out"

Posted: 24 Feb 2009 06:30 PM PST

Chas Freeman's proposed appointment to head the National Intelligence
Council is already getting lots of scrutiny. A former Saudi lobbyist who
did business with the Bin Laden group, Chas Freeman has naturally spewed

more than his share of bile toward Israel, and toadying toward the Saudi kingdom.

After 9/11, Chas Freeman sought to do business with the Bin Laden group and

responded to critics by saying that Bin Laden was still “a very honored name in

the kingdom [of Saudi Arabia]". He's called Hezbollah a legitimate outgrowth of

Lebanese nationalism and denied that it was an Iranian puppet. He

bragged about his million dollar donation from the Saudi King to fund

his organization, which he used to publish Walt and Mearsheimer's article

attacking the "Jewish lobby". These days he's pushing for a "One State

Solution" in Israel, code for the destruction of Israel.

Much of this has already been effectively laid out by

such as Melanie Philips. There is however a lot more I have learned.
Chas Freeman is co-chair of the US China Policy Foundation and the

American Iranian Council, with offices in Iran, holder of the Order of

Abd Al-Azziz, 1st Class.

He is also board chairman of Projects International Inc, a company that
facilitates all sorts of projects, particularly in Saudi Arabia.

And even more significantly, Chas Freeman is on the

International Advisory Board of China National Offshore Oil Co.

CNOOC is a State owned enterprise , controlled by the Chinese government.

As such Chas Freeman has openly worked for both Saudi Arabia and the

People's Republic of China. CNOOC did business pretty much the way you

expect a Chinese state owned company to do business, with large
scale pollution, intimidation and evictions.

And CNOOC has designs on snapping up American oil companies,

so it can do business in the US. This closeness between Chas Freeman

and the People's Republic of China has translated into Freeman

ruthlessly doing their propaganda for them.

This puts into perspective the Weekly Standard's revelation that Chas
Freeman sent out a message saying that China did not go far enough

in the Tiananmen Square Massacre. Such folk, whether they represent a

veterans' "Bonus Army" or a "student uprising" on behalf of "the

goddess of democracy" should expect to be displaced with despatch

from the ground they occupy. I cannot conceive of any American
government behaving with the ill-conceived restraint that the Zhao
Ziyang administration did in China, allowing students to occupy zones
that are the equivalent of the Washington National Mall and Times
Square, combined. while shutting down much of the Chinese
government's normal operations. I thus share the hope of the majority in
China that no Chinese government will repeat the mistakes of Zhao Ziyang's
dilatory tactics of appeasement in dealing with domestic protesters in China.

This has been covered, but I present some more of Chas Freeman's

Greatest Hits that have yet to be covered. Here's the view that Obama's

nominee to head the National Intelligence Council offered to Rolling Stone

when asked what to do about the War in Iraq.

A panel of experts convened by Rolling Stone agree that the war in

Iraq is lost.

The only question now is: How bad will the coming explosion be?
Chas Freeman: The most efficient way to avoid mass killings is to
help the Shiites win fast, consolidate their damn
dictatorship and get the hell out.

The level of anarchy and hatred and emotional disturbance is such
that it's very hard to imagine anything except a Saddam-style reign of
terror succeeding in pacifying the place.

Clear on that? The man who will be advising the White House
on the world situation, favored setting up an Iranian backed dictatorship in

Iraq, and then quickly withdrawing.

And we're just getting started.

Chas Freeman became the darling of the left wing by repeatedly attacking
the US war in Iraq, including repeatedly ridiculing the claim that Saddam

had weapons of Mass Destruction. However before the US invasion, Chas

Freeman delivered a speech claiming that if we attacked Saddam, he would use

weapons of mass destruction against us... while implying that 9/11 was
justified because we had attacked Bin Laden's homeland.

Former U. S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia Chas Freeman, in
a recent speech, warned that the U. S. could expect an

eye-for-an-eye response: "One lesson of September

11th that we need to recall more than any other is that if
we attack someone else's homeland in this day and age, we
can expect that our own homeland will be attacked.
We know that if we attack Saddam he will use weapons of mass
destruction in whatever way he can. We don't know, however,what
preparations he's made."

Of course this was par for the course as Chas Freeman had
all but gone into business whoring for the Saudi Kingdom.

I would say that the last two years, as we mark the
anniversary of September 11th, have seen a major

deterioration in the atmosphere and tone of the U.S.-Saudi

relations broadly written, even as the two governments have
continued a fairly cordial and cooperative relationship.

The irony is that both Washington and Riyadh have ended up
defending the value of the relationship and the quality of the
relationship against, frankly, often very ignorant and uninformed,
but malicious attacks from their own publics.

Naturally Chas Freeman was also against expecting any reforms in

Afghanistan for the rights of women.

Chas Freeman, president of the Middle East Policy Council and a

former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia:

“We need to recall the reason we went to Afghanistan in the first place. …

Our purpose was to deny the use of Afghan territory to terrorists with
global reach. That was, and is, an attainable objective. It is a limited
objective that can be achieved at reasonable cost. We must return to a
ruthless focus on this objective. We cannot afford to pursue goals,
however worthy, that it contradicts or undermines it.

The reform
of Afghan politics, society and mores must wait.”

But lest you think that Chas Freeman's relationship with the Saudis is

monogamous, he has a long history of being equally willing to write

hosannas to the People's Republic of China. From justifying the

Tianamen Square Massacre to constantly attacking Taiwan,

Chas Freeman proved all too willing to serve

another brutal dictatorship.

Sometimes, for example, in the matters of Taiwan, Tibet
or the democracy movement in Hong Kong, Americans are enlisted

by lobbyists acting on behalf of separatist or dissident movements in

greater China.

Naturally the only "separatist" movements Chas Freeman seems to
support are those backed by Iran or Saudi Arabia. Taiwan, which

actually is a separate country, need not apply.

April 19, 2000: Chas Freeman argues that Taiwan has provoked a

crisis,and that unless it reverses course,

China and the US are headed for war.

Mr. Freeman: But you see, Les, I don't agree that those are the issues

because I think that there is virtually zero prospect of Taiwan gratuitously

provoking Beijing with a declaration of independence. I think the question

before Taiwan now that has been put clearly by Beijing is "Are you

prepared to reverse course from the declaration of independence,

without using that word, that you have already pronounced.
And if you are not prepared to reverse course. If you adhere to the

view that you are entitled to be treated by the international community

and by other Chinese as a separate state then the consequences of that

will be the use of force."

... The Chinese are quite capable of negotiating solutions of issues that are

very difficult and being patient. And the saddest thing here is that their
counterparts in Taiwan have not allowed them to exercise that patience.

Just consider the example of the difference between Indian actions in

taking Goa by force and Chinese actions in waiting decades to negotiate a

peaceful retrocession of Hong Kong.

In Chas Freeman's twisted worldview, China is to be praised by not
invading by force. But what else should one expect from a man who

penned the following description of Mao Zedong, China's own Stalin.

Mao Zedong had a force and energy which none but men of
equally great spiritual conviction could withstand. His animal appetites,

we now know, matched his intellectual vigor. He was an object of

adulation to his subjects and of mingled admiration and dread to

his subordinates and intimates.

While Mao lived, the brilliance of his personality illuminated the

farthest corners of his country and inspired many would-be

revolutionaries and romantics beyond it.

It is quite clear that Chas Freeman either has no principles that

can't be bought, or outright worships and celebrates brutal tyrannies.

As Melanie Philips writes, he is indeed the best weapon that

Islamists could have in their armory. And not only Islamists.
Every dictatorship around the world could not ask for a better
friend.

And now Obama will put into place a second Saudi puppet to
head a major piece of the national security structure, after James

L. Jones. But let's close with one more excerpt from Chas Freeman on Israel.

Tragically, despite all the advantages and opportunities Israel has

had over the fifty-nine years of its existence, it has failed to achieve

concord and reconciliation with anyone in its region, still less to gain

their admiration or affection.

The framework proposed by Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah
at Beirut in 2002 offers Israel an opportunity to accomplish both.

It has the support of all Arab governments.

Despite the fact that such a peace is so obviously also in Israel's

vital and moral interests, history and the Israeli response to

date both strongly suggest that without some tough love from

Americans, including especially Israel's American coreligionists,

Israel will not risk the uncertainties of peace. ... But unless they

are changed, the Arab peace plan will exceed its shelf life, and Arabs
will revert to their previous views that Israel is an ethnomaniacal society
with which it is impossible for others to coexist and that peace can be
achieved only by Israel's eventual annihilation, much as the
Crusader kingdoms that once occupied Palestine were eventually destroyed.