from NY to Israel Sultan Reveals
The Stories Behind the News

The Arab World Makes Way for the Muslim World

Posted: 09 Aug 2009 07:56 PM PDT

In the video below, Azmi Bishara, an Arab member of the Israeli
Knesset speaks openly about the fact that there was never a Palestinian
nation/people (Ummah Palestini) only an Arab nation (Ummah Arabi).

During the 2006 war with the Syrian
and Iranian backed Hizbollah terrorist group (another proxy group, this
one aimed at both Lebanon and Israel), Azmi Bishara provided Hizbullah
with information on targets in Israel. He has since fled Israel.

Ummah Arabi or in the arabic, Ummah Arabiyah, refers to
Pan-Arabism, a Supra-Arab state encompassing the entire Middle East. An
ideology dating back to Gamal Abdul Nasser, the Baathists in Iraq and
Syria, and their Soviet masters. As well as Arafat's Fatah terrorist
organization.

Today however Amzi Bishara's Ummah Arabiyah is
making way for Ummah Islamiyah, an Islamic Caliphate uniting Muslims
around the world, an ideology that includes the various branches of the
Muslim Brotherhood, including Hamas and Al Queda, as well as Iran and its
Shiite backed terrorist groups, such as Hezbollah.

The Two State
solution does not mean two states living side by side. It used to mean an
Ummah Arabiyah state inside Israel, working at the command of Syria, Iraq
and the rest of the Ummah Arabiyah contenders to carve up Israel from the
inside. Today it means an Ummah Islamiyah state inside Israel, doing its
best to destroy Israel.

As a Marxist, Bishara was advocating an
Ummah Arabiyah in place of Israel, a national Arab socialist camp, as
embodied by Nasser, Assad, Arafat and Saddam Hussein. Naturally this camp
could only have one "true" leader, which was to be the ruler of the most
powerful Arab country who would also succeed in destroying Israel.

But nationalism in the Arab world has always been a tricky sell,
mainly because Arab nations are artificial entities. Jordan, Syria, Egypt,
Iraq and much of the Arab world consists of states and peoples
artificially created by colonialism.

Pan-Arab nationalism, and
today a Caliphate, was so popular precisely because the nationalism of
individual Arab nations is such an absurdity.

Take Jordan, like
Palestine,a regional name inaccurately assigned to a country. Carved up by
European treaty agreements and assigned a failed Saudi royal family, the
Hashemites, which in turn is resented by much of the population which
supports Islamic terrorists including Al Queda at a higher ratio than
virtually any other part of the Middle East. Under the Hashemites,
Christians in Jordan went from comprising almost a third of the
population, to little more than 5 percent.

Then there's Syria, its name deriving from the Greek name for
Assyrians. Today Syria has a lot of Arabs and rather few Assyrians, thanks
to the Assyrian Holocaust perpetrated by Arab Muslims, part of the larger
Islamic ethnic cleansing and genocides perpetrated against the native
peoples of the Middle East by the Arab tribes who had once been marginal
players in the region.

Egypt and Iraq's rulers have made a great
show of trying to connect their nations to an ancient past of Pharaohs and
Babylonian rulers. Unfortunately for them, those all involve peoples who
have nothing to do with the modern day Arabs who rule and dominate both
nations. In the wake of the US liberation, Iraqi nationalism quickly
collapsed back into religious and tribal factionalism. Egypt lacks
religious factionalism, instead its Sunni hardliners, the Muslim
Brotherhood, also behind Al Queda and Hamas, are waiting for their chance
to seize power.

Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the UAE have never
particularly bothered with nationalism, sticking to good old tribalism,
backed by billions in oil money stolen from nationalized Western oil
companies. Their cities may gleam with skyscrapers and playgrounds for the
rich, but the reality is that are nothing more than large family groups,
staunchly conservative Wahhabis in religion, they try to play successor to
Mohammed by promoting a global Jihad in the name of the Ummah Islamiyah.

It would be inaccurate to call them post-nationalists, but rather
pre-nationalists. Like Mohammed they do not focus on national entities but
on tribal and religious ones. The Caliphate is their vision for the Middle
East and the rest of the world. Unlike their louder cousin, Osama Bin
Laden, they avoid obvious saber rattling and confrontations, instead
relying on the slow creep of Islamization and the influence that their
wealth buys them abroad to shape the West.

The Saudi lobby is a
great deal more powerful than the Israel lobby, it is also much less
visible. It has an endless variety of front organizations, from domestic
citizens groups such as CAIR, to much more intimate connections through
the oil industry and deep into the foreign policy establishment of the
West. The most often heard voices from organizations and mosques in the
West come from Saudi funded groups.

Afghanistan marked a major
turning point, as the Ummah Arabiyah Arab socialists turned a blind eye to
the Soviet invasion, or even openly defended it, while the Ummah Islamiyah
directed arms and fighters there. It marked not only the rise of Osama Bin
Laden, but the rise of the Ummah Islamiyah's dream of a Great Islamic
Caliphate.

In Afghanistan, ties were bridged with Asian Muslim
dictatorships, such as Pakistan, creating a pan-global network of Ummah
Islamyiah terrorists operating to expand Islamic territories and win
independence across the globe. No longer bound by Arab chauvinism or the
petty regional ambitions of Arab rulers, Ummah Islamiyah quickly expanded
around the world. All that an Ummah Islamiyah terrorist group needed for a
foothold was an Islamic minority in any country. Soon Saudi trained Imams
would help radicalize the population, provide them with literature on
Jihad and the rest would be history.

The Arab nationalist defeats against Israel in
1967 and 1973, Sadat's peace with Israel, the collapse of the USSR and
finally the fall of the House of Saddam; marked the close of the Ummah
Arabiyah era. Islamic terrorist groups replaced Marxist terrorist groups.
Some Marxist groups such as Arafat's Fatah, repackaged themselves with a
more Islamic identity, complete with suicide bombers bound for martyrdom
in virgin paradise.

The other side of the Ummah Islamiyah though
are the Shiites. The fall of the Shah's Iran replaced it with clerical
rule. The Iraq-Iran war marked a bloody collision between the Ummah
Arabiyah and the Ummah Islamiyah with no victor. Today however with Iran
wielding the whip hand over the House of Assad in Baathist Syria and
impinging on Syria's former fiefdom in Lebanon through Hizbullah, the
Shiite Ummah Islamiyah is on the rise. Having gathered to itself Syria's
former Ummah Arabiyah Pan-Arabic proxies, while sidelining the rest, Iran
has gotten into the business of backing Ummah Islamiyah Sunni terrorist
groups such as Hamas in Gaza and the Taliban in Afghanistan; this despite
a failure to come to terms with Osama bin Laden before 9/11 and the US
liberation of Iraq.

A key asset for Iran is that it not only is the
homeland of the most sizable schismatic Islamic sect, but also boasts a
leadership that is ethnically Persian, and unlike the various Arab
kingdoms playing with an imaginary history, it can draw on exclusive
stream of both religious and national identity. Unlike Saddam's hollow
Babylonian posturing, Persian nationalism is a potent force that even the
Islamic Republic's leaders have drawn on.

However since Persians
are only a percentage of Iran but not the whole, Shiite Islam serves to
bring together the various strands of Iran's marginalized ethnic groups,
though naturally not the Sunnis, Zoroastrians, Jews or any of Iran's other
persecuted religious minorities.

However Iran's emphasis on its
Islamic identity rather than its Persian identity, even if it is one that
most Muslims consider to be a dangerously heretical strain, a perception
only increased by the Ayatollah Khomeini assigning himself virtually the
same theocratic powers as Mohammed, has still helped bridge the gap with
Ummah Islamiyah. And while Al Queda refused to play ball with the
Ayatollahs and instead launched a murderous killing spree against Iraqi
Shiites, its cousin Hamas has not had the same objections willingly
accepting Iranian aid, as have the Taliban.

On all sides the Arab
World is making way for the Muslim World. The Ummah Arabiyah, the Pan-Arab
nationalistic vision by Arab dictators who modeled themselves on Hitler
and Stalin, as did Saddam Hussein, Gammal Abdel Nasser and Anwar Sadat,
and funded and organized by the USSR is in a steep decline. In its place
comes Ummah Islamiyah which lacks the traditional weaknesses of Arab
nationalism and has far less need for structure.

Unlike Ummah
Arabiyah, the Ummah Islamiyah does not need to model itself on Western
states that can field successful armies. Every Arab Israeli war and the
two Gulf Wars have conclusively demonstrated that no Arab nation can hope
to match a first world military, or its non-oil and non-tourism
industries. Ummah Islamiyah instead relies on the time honored tactics of
the Bedouin bandit fused with the religious martyrdom and frenzy of the
Hassashin.

While Mao and Che may still be read, the Ummah
Islamiyah terrorist is much more likely to rely on Mohammed's terrorist
tactics manual, best known as the Koran. That is why he does not seek a
comprehensive military victory, but only to engage his enemies in
prolonged low intensity conflicts that last for decades, drawing blood
endlessly from First World nations until they agree to a series of
increasingly humiliating terms that will ultimately lead to their
destruction and enslavement.

All this mode of conflict requires is
willing recruits, a territory of operations and enough funding to keep
buying weapons year after year. And across the world that has been easy
enough to come by.

Where the Ummah Arabiyah sought to redeem Arab
pride with military victories in the mold of Saladin, Ummah Islamiyah is
determined to continue killing until they get their way. As the Arab world
makes way for the Muslim world, the axis of the conflicts shifts to a
global quest for an Islamic caliphate.

Just as Hitler's coinage of
Volksdeutsche broadened German imperial ambitions into a racial quest, and
then with National Socialism, transformed it into a global ideology--
Middle Eastern terrorists began with Arab nationalism and have moved on to
Islamic nationalism. They have learned well the lessons of Hitler and
Stalin, both of whom served as models for the Pan-Arabism of the Ummah
Arabiyah; that to conquer the world you must first forge a common cause
with a global ideology.

Islam is to the planned caliphate, what
Nazism was to Hitler and Communism was to Stalin. 9/11 was Osama bin
Laden's bid to be the Hitler and Stalin of the Ummah Islamiyah. Bush's
prompt action against him frustrated his ambitions to leverage his war
against the US for his followers to seize control of the Gulf Emirates and
Pakistan. Across the Shiite divide, Ahmadinejad has positioned himself as
the messianic figure, the incarnation of the Mahdi, who will destroy
Israel and unite Islam together.

With the ideology of Islamism in
place, and with Muslims across the world serving as the equivalent of
Hitler's Volksdeutsche, paving the way for a global war by Islam against
the infidel nations of the Dar Al Harb... and if like Chamberlain we do
nothing but appease, the Hitler of Islam will no doubt emerge as
well.