Islam in the public schools

Visit our News page Islam in the Public Schools We are not surprised by the revelations contained in the article below. Brigitte Gabriel regularly speaks out about a three week Islam course used in some public schools, which sanitizes the history of Islam and is essentially a proselytizing tool that requires students to memorize verses from the Qur’an and say the Islamic shahada, the words spoken when one becomes a Muslim. The issue is not teaching about religion. It is appropriate for our schools to teach children, in an evenhanded and factual way, about the major religions of the world, as this is integral part of world history. The issue is how Islam is so often presented. We are so concerned about this problem that earlier this year our “sister” organization, American Congress for Truth, retained a top-notch research team to investigate this. The team is currently analyzing school textbooks for factual errors, historical inaccuracies, preferential treatment given to Islam, and the like. The culmination of the project next year will be a written report that we will make available online as well as mail to every school board member in America. Updated: Tue., Aug. 24, 2010, 5:07 AM HS test 'slams' Christianity, lauds Islam By YOAV GONEN Education Reporter Last Updated: 5:07 AM, August 24, 2010 Posted: 2:33 AM, August 24, 2010 State testmakers played favorites when quizzing high-schoolers on world religions -- giving Islam and Buddhism the kid-gloves treatment while socking it to Christianity, critics say. Teachers complain that the reading selections from the Regents exam in global history and geography given last week featured glowing passages pertaining to Muslim society but much more critical essay excerpts on the subject of Christianity. "There should have been a little balance in there," said one Brooklyn teacher who administered the exam but did not want to be identified. "To me, this was offensive because it's just so inappropriate and the timing of it was piss-poor," he added, referring to the debate over the plan to build a mosque near Ground Zero. The most troubling passage came from Daniel Roselle's "A World History: A Cultural Approach," observers said. The passage reads: "Wherever they went, the Moslems [sic] brought with them their love of art, beauty and learning. From about the eighth to the eleventh century, their culture was superior in many ways to that of western Christendom." Meanwhile, an excerpt listing the common procedures used by Christian friars to introduce the religion in Latin America stated that "idols, temples and other material evidences of paganism [were] destroyed," and "Christian buildings [were] often constructed on sites of destroyed native temples" -- and built with free Indian labor, to boot. "I can see why some people might see these questions as skewed," said Mark MacWilliams, a religious-studies professor at St. Lawrence University in upstate Canton. "Why does the exam seem to have only documents that portray Islam as a religion of peace, civilization and refinement, while it includes documents about Christianity that show it was anything but peaceful in the Spanish conquest of the Americas?" At the same time, MacWilliams criticized the presentation of Hernando Cortes' conquest of Mexico -- which he said portrayed him as a "choirboy" rather than a "conquistador." "It's quite a whitewash," he said. Some other religious-studies experts contacted by The Post said they didn't see what the fuss was all about. "[The] selections seem about equal in terms of being historically/culturally focused, all relatively positive about the contributions made by each religion as it was introduced into various societies," wrote Barbara Sproul, an associate professor of religion at Hunter College in Manhattan. Yet Michael Dobkowski, chair of Religious Studies at Hobart and William Smith Colleges in upstate Geneva, asserted that it was only Christianity for which both positive and negative aspects were highlighted. "Some [essays] suggest a kind of Christian triumphalism and the desire to convert the other that is not present in the treatment of Islam," he said. "My impression is that there is certainly a divergence of approaches and impressions that should not appear in a Regents exam of this caliber." State education officials said that every effort had been made to present accurate historical information through the excerpts. They said the questions had been developed over a four-year period and require students to use their own knowledge of social studies to produce answers. They added that they weren't aware of any complaints about the exam. The Muslim reading: * “Wherever they went, the Moslems [sic] brought with them their love of art, beauty and learning. From about the eighth to the eleventh century, their culture was superior in many ways to that of western Christendom. * “Some of the finest centers of Moslem life were established in Spain. In Cordova, the streets were solidly paved, while at the same time in Paris people waded ankle-deep in mud after a rain. Cordovan public lamps lighted roads for as far as ten miles; yet seven hundred years later there was still not a single public lamp in London!” Source: Daniel Roselle, A World History: A Cultural Approach The Christian reading: Common Procedures used by Friars in Converting Areas in Spanish America: * “Idols, temples and other material evidences of paganism destroyed.” * “Christian buildings often constructed on sites of destroyed native temples in order to symbolize and emphasize the substitution of one religion by the other.” * “Indians supplied construction labor without receiving payment.” * “In a converted community, services and fiestas were regularly held in the church building.” Source: Based on information from Charles Gibson, Spain in America Additional reporting by Chuck Bennett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACT for America P.O. Box 12765 Pensacola, FL 32591 www.actforamerica.org ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure. The news items, blogs, educational materials and other information in our emails and on our website are only intended to provide information, news and commentary on events and issues related to the threat of radical Islam. Much of this information is based upon media sources, such as the AP wire services, newspapers, magazines, books, online news blog and news services, and radio and television, which we deem to be reliable. However, we have undertaken no independent investigation to verify the accuracy of the information reported by these media sources. We therefore disclaim all liability for false or inaccurate information from these media sources. We also disclaim all liability for the third-party information that may be accessed through the material referenced in our emails or posted on our website. HOW CAN I TELL OTHERS ABOUT YOUR ORGANIZATION? Send a personalized version of this message to your friends. HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR ORGANIZATION? Click here to give an online donation.