Please take a moment to
visit and log in at the subscriber
area, and submit your city & country location. We will use this
information in future to invite you to any events that we organize in
your area.
Shifting
Mideast Sands Reveal New Alliances
by Jonathan Spyer
PJ Media
March 14, 2014
  Be the first of
your friends to like this.
A number of events in recent weeks cast light on the current
intersecting lines of conflict in the Middle East. They reflect a region
in flux, in which new bonds are being formed, and old ones torn asunder.
But amid the confusion, a new topography is emerging.
This was the month in which a long-existent split in the Sunni Arab
world turned into a gaping fissure. On March 5th, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain
and the United Arab Emirates announced that they were withdrawing their
ambassadors from the Emirate of Qatar.
This decision was clearly a response to Qatar's continued support and
sponsorship of the Muslim Brotherhood movement. This movement is regarded
as a subversive threat by the three Gulf states. They are worried by the
Brotherhood's capacity for internal subversion.
Qatar, by contrast, affords generous subsidies to its tiny citizen
body, and has little to fear from potential internal unrest. It continues
to support the Brotherhood and to domicile key leaders of the Egyptian
branch of the movement. The latter is now engaged in an insurgency
against the Egyptian authorities.
Saudi patience was at an end. The removal of the ambassadors reflects
this.
On March 7th, Saudi Arabia made the additional move of declaring the
Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization. A Saudi researcher and
former general, Dr. Anwar Eshki, was quoted on the Now Lebanon website as
asserting that the decision was made with particular focus on the
Egyptian Brotherhood, which is involved in "terrorist"
activity.
In the same week, an Egyptian court banned all activities by the Hamas
organization in Egypt, and referred to the movement as a "terrorist
organization."
The proximity of these announcements reflects the very close emergent
alliance between Saudi Arabia and the de facto Sisi regime in Egypt,
which is likely to become de jure following presidential elections later
this year.
This alliance is the core component of an emergent dispensation in the
Sunni Arab world which also includes UAE, Bahrain and Jordan, as well as
the fragile West Bank Palestinian Authority of Mahmoud Abbas.
This alliance is set to emerge as the strongest element among the
Sunni Arabs.
It is opposed both to the Iran-led, mainly Shia "resistance"
bloc, and to what is left of the Qatar/Muslim Brotherhood alliance that
just a short year ago was proclaiming itself the wave of the future in
the Middle East.
The Hamas authority in Gaza has no buy into the new Saudi-Sisi bloc.
Formerly aligned with Iran, it put its bets on the Qatar/Muslim
Brotherhood axis.
But this putative bloc was fatally damaged by the Sisi coup in Egypt
of July 3rd, 2013, and by the departure of the Muslim Brotherhood-related
Nahda party in Tunisia.
Hamas appears to be trying to find its way back to the Iranians.
Gaza's "foreign minister" Mahmoud al Zahar and Iran's
parliament spokesman Ali Larijani both made statements this week
suggesting that relations had returned to normal between Teheran and
Hamas.
It is not clear what this actually means. But Iranian funding to Hamas
in Gaza was slashed following the latter's failure to offer support to
the Iranian client regime in Damascus. It is unlikely that Iran has
either forgotten or forgiven. Al-Zahar, in any case, is among those Hamas
officials most closely supportive of Iran and his statements should not
be taken as representing the movement as a whole.
This means that Hamas is probably stuck between Qatar
and the Iranians, with the support of the former no longer worth what it
once was, and the support of the latter available only in a truncated and
reduced form.
The week's events in Gaza, meanwhile, showcased the
continued vigor of the Iran-led camp.
The most staunch supporter of Iran among the
Palestinians, and now apparently the main beneficiary of Teheran's
largesse, is the Islamic Jihad movement. This is a purely paramilitary
and terrorist group, with no pretensions to mass political leadership. As
such, it is a less complicated prospect from Teheran's point of view than
Hamas.
The recent apprehending of the Klos-C arms ship by
Israel, as it brought a consignment of weapons evidently intended for
Islamic Jihad in Gaza, was the latest indication of Teheran's willingness
to offer practical backing to those it favors.
Islamic Jihad's furious response to the Israeli
apprehending of the craft, and to the killing in recent days of a number
of its operatives by Israel, was certainly done with Iran's blessing and
probably at its instruction (along with tacit permission from the Hamas
authorities in Gaza).
The interrupted route of the weapons intended for Gaza
(from Syria to Iran, to Iraq, to Sudan and then to the Strip) and the
subsequent rocket fire should remind us that the Iran-led Shia bloc
remains a potent gathering, capable of coordinated, region-wide action.
So three power blocs currently dominate the Middle
East — the Iran-led Shia group, a rival emergent Cairo-Riyadh axis
leading a group of smaller Sunni states, and a smaller, much weaker
Qatar-Muslim Brotherhood alliance. Their competition is set to dominate
regional affairs in the period opening up.
Israel, of course, will be a charter member of none of
these groups. But Jerusalem is a de facto ally of the Saudi-Egypt camp.
Egypt and Saudi Arabia, along with Israel, were in
recent decades the main allies of the U.S. in the area. The former two
countries are now in search of new friends, and have found each other.
Saudi Arabia and the UAE have tried to lobby on Sisi's behalf in Washington
in recent weeks, though as yet with limited success.
The shifting sands of the Mid-Eastern strategic map
are all the result of the perceived withdrawal of the U.S. from its role
as a regional patron. This process is still underway and it's too soon to
draw any final conclusions regarding its results. But the current drawing
together of Saudi Arabia and Sisi's Egypt is surely among the most
significant responses to it. It is likely to form the basis for the Sunni
Arabs' attempts to contain Iranian ambitions in the period ahead.
Jonathan Spyer is a senior research fellow
at the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and a
fellow at the Middle East Forum.
|
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment