Guest
Column: Europe on Edge One Month After Charlie Hebdo
by Abigail R. Esman
Special to IPT News
February 9, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Share:  
|
  Be the
first of your friends to like this.
 It didn't
take long.
Less than a month after the Charlie Hebdo murders and the
slaughter of four Jews at a kosher supermarket in Paris, Islamic State (IS,
or ISIS) has sent a warning now to Belgium: "This," they wrote in a letter to Het Laatste News (HLM), "is
only the beginning."
The letter, received by HLN's editors on Feb. 4, referred also to a
series of attacks in France that pre-dated the Paris massacres: "What
happened in France will happen, too, in Belgium," the typewritten
letter stated in perfect French, "and from Belgium, IS will conquer
all of Europe."
According to HLN, counterterrorism officials are taking the letter
seriously and believe it is the legitimate work of an IS jihadist. More,
they claim that the writer is aware of current events in Belgium, down to
small details. (The full text of the letter has not been released.)
The same day, news arrived in the Netherlands that Dutch jihadist Abu
Hanief had just blown himself up in Fallujah – the fourth Dutch Muslim
to commit a suicide bombing in Syria or Iraq. Hanief, 32, had been among
the leaders of pro-IS demonstrations last summer in the Hague in which
demonstrators called for the death of Jews. Though he was arrested on
charges of hate speech after the protest, he was soon released; and
evidently, despite government efforts to confiscate or cancel the passports
of Dutch Muslims suspected of planning to join the Syrian jihad, he shortly
thereafter slipped out undetected.
This is Europe now, poised at a moment when, while anti-Semitism is at
record highs in France and the UK, Muslim groups call for "anti-Islamophobia" policies and
boycotts against Israel; when officials in Wolfsburg, Germany, are investigating an alleged jihadist cell with ties to IS
and as many as 50 members, most of them living in Germany; when Belgian
police have arrested 15 people in the town of Verviers (population
56,000) and several others throughout the country, all since the
Paris terrorist attacks that ran from Jan. 7-Jan. 9.
And no wonder, as some so-called "mainstream" Muslims now
refuse to distance themselves from the acts of Muslim terrorists –
including the atrocities committed by the Islamic State: Noted Shabir Burhani, a religious Muslim in his 20s and
a student at the University of Leiden in the Netherlands, "We have to
accept Islam in its entirety, not try to adjust it to the times. Sharia is
part of it, as are jihad and the Islamic state." But Burhani, who
previously served as spokesman for the now-defunct Sharia4Holland, does not
view ISIS as the ideal, he told Dutch daily Trouw. It's not the
murders themselves he rejects, he said, but "the way IS does it, and
shows it off to the world can be counterproductive. Does that really
benefit Islam?"
He is not the only one: at a Jan. 16 forum held in Amsterdam Muslim
groups presented a manifesto against Islamophobia. Coming just days after
the slaughter of four Jews in Paris and six months after the execution of
four others in Brussels, the document begins by describing anti-Semitism in
the Netherlands – where in August, Hanief led hundreds in a chant of
"Kill Jews" – as "mild," while "Islamophobia is
anything but."
And what are some of the symptoms of this "Islamophobia?"
Some are legitimate concerns: Muslim youth face job discrimination.
Families receive hate letters from neighbors.
What else?
People demand that Muslims in the Netherlands distance themselves from
Islamic terrorism.
Apparently this, as Burhani states, is anti-Islam.
Now, France debates the future of its cherished secularism and the
future feasibility of a secular state in a democracy in which millions of
religious Muslims, whose religion contradicts secular ideals, make their
home. Many seem to feel that democracy demands allowing the religious to
practice their beliefs – all beliefs, in all religions, as their faith
requires. Secularism, they seem to suggest, is itself
"Islamophobic."
But if some believers demand the conquest of their faith over others,
even by the sword, what then? If Burhani is right, and the jihadists of IS
are merely practicing their religion, can a democratic society rightly shut
them out?
But it can. And it must. Secularism, after all, does not demand the
faithful forfeit their belief within the private sphere. And neither does
democracy. We must not allow radical and jihadist Muslims to conquer our
bright democratic vision by blindly destroying it ourselves.
|
Print
Send
Comment
RSS
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment