Solsticewitch13's BOS: Ignorance as a Political Point of View

Monday, February 9, 2009

Ignorance as a Political Point of View

Ignorance as a Political Point-of-View

Rational thought and facts are the only tools we have to combat political Islam.
On the basis of facts and logic, the kafirs beat the dhimmis and the Muslims,
every time. But rational thought is being declared an enemy of the Newstate.
The Newstate is the government, the media, and the universities. They all work
as one team now. The war against political Islam has become a war to preserve
the remnants of rational/critical thought. It is the purpose of the Newstate
to eliminate critical/rational thought and analysis. The battle is not with
Islam; the battle is with us and how we think.

There is a rational basis for discussing Islam, but people do not want a rational
basis because they really don’t want to open the box and look inside. There
is a profound fear of actually looking into the eyes of Mohammed and knowing
the mind of Islam. Fear, because we feel ourselves to be in the position of
a spouse who has suspicions that their partner is cheating on them. If they
found out that their suspicions were true, they would have to do something,
so it seems better not to know. To keep us from asking questions and wanting
to know, the Newstate has declared knowledge about Islam is to be called bigotry.
We just don’t do that, you know, discuss Islam. It is not proper behavior.
Bigots don’t like Muslims. Isn’t being afraid of Islam called Islamo-phobia?
Exerting critical thought about Islam gets you labeled as mentally and ethically
ill. The primary weapon of the Newstate against knowledge is name-calling and
insults. To have knowledge about political Islam is a crime against the Newstate.

It is a crime because the authority of the Newstate has decreed it to be so.
The genius of the Newstate is knowing that if facts are made a civil crime then
critical thought cannot begin. For this reason, the media never, but never,
connects the dots of what is happening with political Islam.

We are beginning to mimic the thinking process of Islam. Islam does not allow
critical thought, because critical thought is based upon doubt. Doubt might
cause you to ask questions like: “Why was Mohammed having the heads of
800 male Jews cut off? Why were the women and children sold in wholesale lots
to get money for financing jihad?”

The Newstate has decreed what knowledge is allowed and what knowledge is forbidden.
We have lists of ideas that cannot be argued in public without some sort of
censor. Go to any university, newspaper or government agency and see if you
can discuss:

The role of Islam in world slavery

In a women’s studies class, see if you can discuss how Sharia law oppresses
women around the world

The history of dhimmi

The Islamic annihilation of Buddhist culture in Afghanistan

The role of political Islam in the Israel/”Palestinian” war

See if there is any critical thought about Islam anywhere in the school, newspaper,
or government agency

See if you can get the local paper to run any articles on the above. Maybe
National Public Radio will do a segment. Not! If you try to get the Rotary club
or a local church to talk about any of these and you will find no forum. No
one wants to know. You better not talk about it at work, either. If Human Resources
hears about it you will be in deep bigot country.

Everybody knows this is at the same cultural level of knowing not to “break
wind” in public. You just don’t talk about Islam in public territory.
It is like telling N-word jokes. It’s not done.

We call this constraint of public discourse political correctness. Islam has
a word for political correctness—haram, meaning it is forbidden. The Newstate
now enforces what is allowed (halal) and what is forbidden (haram). Islamic
knowledge has always been authoritative and now the Newstate is demanding the
authority to tell us when to speak or not to speak. So, the Newstate enforces
haram for Islam.

Freedom of speech and the speech of dissent is fading. America is in the beginning
phases of authoritarianism. Universities are becoming centers of authoritarian
knowledge--not centers of analytic and scientific reasoning. Critical or analytic
thinking demands looking at all sides of a question. One of the most important
questions of the 21st century is how do we deal with political Islam. But no
university teaches any subjects on Islamic
slavery, the Islamic annihilation of Christianity or Hinduism, Jews
as dhimmis, or any suffering that Islam causes. The very basis of all Islam--the
Sunna, the Sira (Mohammed’s canonical biography), the Hadith
(his traditions) are not taught. Oh, you might study a verse or a hadith,
but not a systematic study.

If we speak out against political Islam, we are called bigots. But the charge
of bigotry is a morals charge. We, who know, are called immoral. We are not
factually wrong, but morally wrong. Why is it that knowing the life and traditions
of Mohammed makes someone immoral, while not knowing the Sunna makes you morally
superior? Why has ignorance become a valid point of view?

All of the doctrine of Islam is found in the Trilogy of Koran, Sira, and Hadith.
If you have not read these then you have not read both the foundation and the
entirety of Islam. Why should any official, professor, priest, rabbi, preacher,
or media pundit have any right to speak at all until they have read the basic
material? Why should ignorance be a leadership quality?

America was founded based on arguments and debates, but now dissent is becoming
morally wrong. For example: The New York Times is backing the suppression of
Geert Wilder’s movie Fitna. In a shame and a disgrace, the Times condemns
the man. They condemn him because he is offensive and insulting. Offensive to
whom? Not to me. And they never once asked any questions about whether what
he says is true. Truth is no defense against forbidden knowledge, haram. Instead
they say he is the equivalent of a European redneck. They attack the messenger
and not that facts. They don’t want to know about or look at the facts.
Why is it that Islam can be offended, but I can’t? Where are we are we
headed here?

I am more afraid of the ACLU and the Federal government than I am of Islam.
The Newstate is beginning to act as a partner with political Islam. Whatever
political Islam demands, the Newstate will deliver. The Newstate has decreed
that ignorance is the acceptable political point-of-view. And those who represent
facts and critical thinking will be punished and condemned as moral criminals
and enemies of the Newstate.

At this critical juncture, you have two choices. You can choose ignorance,
fear and not being a bigot to please the Newstate. This means being a dhimmi
(a kafir servant of Islam). There is another path, the path of knowledge,
critical thinking and defending your civilization by telling truth about political
Islam. You can choose fear, ignorance and cowardice, or you can choose critical
reasoning, knowledge and courage. It is your choice. If you choose courage and
knowledge, first ground yourself in some of the truth of the doctrine by reading
Mohammed’s biography. It is sacred literature and will do more for you
to understand Islam more than any other single thing. Also check out the information
on citizenwarrior.com,
and join ACT! for America.