The Left’s Blindfolded Dry Hump of the 9/11 Mosque
http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/07/the-lefts-blindfolded-dry-hump-of-the-911-mosque/
They really have no idea just who they’re climbing into bed with.
According to Media Matters and Slate conservatives are stupid bigots who think all Muslims are terrorists. It’s raw hatred that’s driving our opposition to the 9/11 mosque. We’re too moronic and evil to recognize a good, “moderate Muslim” when one’s staring us right in the face.
Question: if this was Dr. Zuhdi Jasser building a mosque two blocks from Ground Zero would any conservatives so much as bat an eye? Of course not. If a true Muslim reformer who shared our love of individual liberty and the principles of the founders wanted to build a mosque then he’d have plenty of support.
But that’s not who the real Faisal Abdul Rauf is. And the braindead leftists at Media Matters and Slate have no excuse for ignoring what’s only a google search away.
Valiant ex-Islamist terrorist Walid Shoebat had an article at Pajamas Media in May that revealed what the Left will not stomach.
Rauf wrote in Arabic to Muslim audiences what his true views were. He has no interest in religious dialogue and wants to see Sharia law imposed on the world:
This phrase is inaccurate. Religious dialogue as customarily understood is a set of events with discussions in large hotels that result in nothing. Religions do not dialogue and dialogue is not present in the attitudes of the followers, regardless of being Muslim or Christian. The image of Muslims in the West is complex which needs to be remedied.
…
Throughout my discussions with contemporary Muslim theologians, it is clear an Islamic state can be established in more than just a single form or mold. It can be established through a kingdom or a democracy. The important issue is to establish the general fundamentals of Sharia that are required to govern. It is known that there are sets of standards that are accepted by [Muslim] scholars to organize the relationships between government and the governed. [emphasis added]
…
New laws were permitted after the death of Muhammad, so long of course that these laws do not contradict the Quran or the Deeds of Muhammad … so they create institutions that assure no conflicts with Sharia. [emphasis in translation]
So is he a “moderate”? Sure. If we define “moderate” as someone who’s going to Islamize the country without guns or bombs. It’s Muslim reformers with whom we will stand. But to be a reformer requires one to acknowledge that Islamic supremacy is a root problem of the “faith” — not an aberration as even George W. Bush foolishly claimed.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment