Thursday, May 24, 2012

Eye on Iran: Iran Rejects West's Proposal on Nuclear Curbs






For continuing coverage follow us on Twitter and join our Facebook group.
  

Top Stories


AP: "Iranian negotiators on Thursday rejected proposals by six world powers to curb Tehran's nuclear program, and demanded answers to their own counteroffer meant to alleviate concerns about the Islamic Republic's ability to build atomic weapons. The stance underscored the difficulties facing the nuclear talks as both sides stake out their terms and agendas for a second day in the Iraqi capital. Still, the negotiations did not appear in danger of collapse. Envoys added extra hours to their meetings as a sandstorm closed down the Baghdad airport. Proposals for another round next month in Geneva also met with resistance from Iran, which is pushing for a venue not considered supportive of Western sanctions. Talks were expected to wrap up later Thursday. The open channels between Iran and the six-nation bloc - the five permanent Security Council members plus Germany - are seen as the most hopeful chances of outreach between Washington and Tehran in years." http://t.uani.com/Kk1e0W

WashPost: "A second day of talks between Iran and world powers began Thursday amid fading hopes that these latest negotiations would help ease tensions over Tehran's disputed nuclear program. Iran rejected a new package of proposals put forward by the six nations, including the United States, on Wednesday, but U.S. officials said the fact that the talks were being extended into Thursday suggested there was still hope the effort could be salvaged. The package contained what U.S. officials said were confidence-building measures that Iran would need to take to show that its nuclear program is not aimed at producing a weapon, including a reduction in the degree to which the country is enriching uranium, from 20 percent to 5 percent. But there was no offer of immediate relief from the biting economic sanctions that are hurting Iran's economy and, notably, no proposal to reconsider a potentially crippling prohibition on Iranian oil exports by the European Union that is to go into effect July 1, a top priority for Tehran." http://t.uani.com/KGhHLM

Reuters: "Iran accused world powers on Thursday of creating 'a difficult atmosphere' hindering talks on its atomic energy programme, signalling a snag in diplomacy to ease a stand-off over fears of a covert Iranian effort to develop nuclear bombs. The nub of the dispute was not immediately clear as the high-stakes negotiations in pursuit of a framework deal to stop a feared drift towards a new Middle East war went into a second day in the Iraqi capital Baghdad. But Iran had served notice that it wanted immediate relief from economic sanctions as part of any deal to stop higher-grade uranium enrichment, a pathway to nuclear arms, whereas Western powers insisted Tehran must first shut it down. Iranian media close to Tehran's delegation said it was insisting on a 'principle of reciprocity' of concessions they said was promised by the powers in preparatory talks in Istanbul last month but was not guiding the Baghdad negotiations." http://t.uani.com/JfaCQL


Nissan Banner

    
Nuclear Program 
  
Reuters: "A U.N. watchdog report is expected to show that Iran has installed more uranium enrichment centrifuges at an underground site, potentially boosting output capacity of nuclear work major powers want it to stop, Western diplomatic sources say. Two sources said the Islamic state may have placed in position nearly 350 machines since February - in addition to the almost 700 centrifuges already operating at the Fordow facility - but that they were not yet being used to refine uranium. If confirmed in the next quarterly report on Iran's nuclear programme by the U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency, tentatively expected on Friday, it is likely to be seen as a sign of continued defiance by the Islamic state of international demands to suspend such activity." http://t.uani.com/Mt7t2M

ABC: "Iranian dissidents have long suspected that the country's Islamist regime has used the cover of its not-so-covert war with Israel to crack down on internal opponents, and that a leading Iranian nuclear scientist whose death was blamed on Mossad might really have been killed by his own government. Now a prominent opposition blogger based in London says that discrepancies in the recent trial and execution of the 'Israeli spy' officially charged with killing scientist Masoud Ali Mohammadi are yet more evidence that Iranian intelligence agents may have been the real assassins. Mohammadi, a nuclear physicist, died in January 2010 when a motorcycle parked outside his house was detonated by remote control when he walked past." http://t.uani.com/LiJCAz  

FP: "Don't expect any breakthroughs with Tehran at the six-power nuclear talks beginning Wednesday in Baghdad, the Obama administration's former top official for Iran Dennis Ross said Tuesday, despite a recent flurry of reporting suggesting otherwise. 'I don't believe that we should be looking at tomorrow as being a make-or-break meeting where if there isn't an unmistakable breakthrough then the process isn't a real process,' Ross said on a conference call. 'One doesn't need to see a breakthrough in these talks. That's unrealistic at this point. The idea that you have a breakthrough after only two rounds, I think, given everything going on, is just not realistic.' There isn't unlimited time to strike a deal with Iran, Ross cautioned. But in order for real progress to be made, he said, the talks have to continue on a regular, predictable schedule." http://t.uani.com/JYI16h

CNN: "When North Korea tried unsuccessfully to launch a rocket last month supposedly to put a satellite in orbit, most of the international community condemned the attempt as a dangerous provocation. Iran recently announced its intention to make a similar attempt, but the chorus of opposition this time seems to be a great deal quieter. Iran said it was aiming to launch its fourth satellite into orbit this week - coincidentally about the same time world powers were meeting in Baghdad for talks on Iran's disputed nuclear program. And that, analysts say, could be one reason for the lack of overt outrage." http://t.uani.com/LHKVyE

Sanctions

Reuters: "South Africa is looking to source more oil from Nigeria, its deputy president said on Wednesday, suggesting Pretoria is moving to cut crude imports from Iran to avoid looming U.S. sanctions. Africa's biggest economy imports a quarter of its crude from Iran, but has come under Western pressure to cut the shipments as part of sanctions designed to halt Tehran's suspected pursuit of nuclear weapons. After several months of confusing and conflicting messages from the diplomatically non-aligned Pretoria, Deputy President Kgalema Motlanthe gave the clearest sign yet that South Africa is shopping around for alternative suppliers." http://t.uani.com/JpSw38  

Economic Times: "Indian refiner Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd plans to cut its crude purchases from sanctions-hit Iran to 100,000 barrels per day (bpd) in the current fiscal year, its managing director said on Wednesday. That would be a reduction of about 19 per cent from its imports in 2010/11 of 6.2 million tonnes or 124,000 bpd. 'We are anticipating problem in supplies from Iran from July,' UK Basu added in comments to reporters." http://t.uani.com/MJRznq

Human Rights

AFP: "World leaders and politicians guilty of human rights abuses will be banned from entering Britain for the 2012 London Olympics, the foreign ministry said Wednesday. 'Entry will be refused where an individual's presence at the Games or in the UK would not be conducive to the public good,' Jeremy Browne, minister of state at the Foreign Office, told parliament in a written statement. 'Where there is independent, reliable and credible evidence that an individual has committed human rights abuses, the individual will not normally be permitted to enter the UK.' The announcement comes after Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that he was hoping to attend the London Olympics, which start on July 27, but that British authorities were reluctant to allow him." http://t.uani.com/KGgCn4

AP: "Iran's official news agency says protesters in front of the German Embassy in Tehran are seeking return of an Iranian-born singer who went into hiding after receiving death threats. Singer Shahin Najafi allegedly insulted a Shiite Muslim saint. The Wednesday report by IRNA said the protesters also demanded that Germany apologize for hosting the singer, who has lived in Germany since 2005. They called the singer an apostate." http://t.uani.com/JtItGY

Foreign Affairs

Reuters: "With most foreign combat troops set to withdraw from Afghanistan by 2014, Iran is using the media in the war-ravaged nation to gain influence, a worrying issue for Washington. Nearly a third of Afghanistan's media is backed by Iran, either financially or through providing content, Afghan officials and media groups say. 'What Iran wants, what they are striving at, is a power base in Afghanistan that can counter American influence,' said a senior government official, who like others for this report, spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity. 'They are without a doubt doing this through supporting and funding our media.'" http://t.uani.com/Kk3Njo

Opinion & Analysis

Clifford May in NRO: "It's no longer possible to pretend we don't know the intentions of Iran's rulers. They are telling us - candidly, clearly, and repeatedly. Most recently last Sunday: Addressing a gathering in Tehran, Major General Hassan Firouzabadi, chief of staff of the Iranian armed forces, vowed the 'full annihilation of the Zionist regime of Israel to the end.' A few days earlier, José Maria Aznar, former prime minister of Spain, during a presentation at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, a respected Israeli think tank, recalled a 'private discussion' in Tehran in October of 2000 with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who told him: 'Israel must be burned to the ground and made to disappear from the face of the Earth.' Dore Gold, the former Israeli ambassador to the U.N. who now heads the JCPA, wanted to be certain there was no misunderstanding. He asked Aznar: Was Khamenei suggesting 'a gradual historical process involving the collapse of the Zionist state, or rather its physical-military termination?' 'He meant physical termination through military force,' Aznar replied. Khamenei called Israel 'an historical cancer' - an echo of Nazi rhetoric he has employed on numerous occasions, the last time in public on February 3. Khamenei also told Aznar that the goal of the Islamic Revolution of 1979 has remained constant. It is to rid the world of two evils: Israel and the United States. Eventually, there must be an 'open confrontation.' Khamenei said it was his duty to ensure that Iran prevails. With this as context, it is no longer possible to pretend that the acquisition of nuclear weapons is not a priority for Khamenei. The notion that he is merely making - as Reuters charmingly phrases it - 'a peaceful bid to generate electricity,' or that he has not decided whether he wants nuclear weapons (notwithstanding his fatwa declaring possession of nuclear weapons a sin), or that he wants them only as a deterrent because he fears foreign aggression, or that he favors diplomatic conflict resolution but requires a series of 'confidence-building measures' - all that is wishful thinking and self-delusion, if not blatant disinformation." http://t.uani.com/JzLcn5

Jonathan Tobin in Commentary: "To their credit, Western negotiators at the P5+1 talks in Baghdad did not completely fold before the negotiations began. They presented a proposal that, while still granting legitimacy to the Iranian nuclear program, did not remove existing sanctions or the threat of an oil embargo in advance of Tehran's agreement to stop refining weapons-grade uranium and to ship their stockpile out of the country. The Iranian reaction to this mild offer was predictable. They claimed it was not only unreasonable but that it violated what the Islamist regime says was agreed to at the previous meeting in Istanbul. That means those who feared the Baghdad meeting would lead to an unsatisfactory agreement that could be represented as ending the crisis but by no means removing the Iranian nuclear threat can exhale. But that does not mean the danger of an Iranian diplomatic victory is averted. Quite the contrary, the Iranians view their indignant refusal as just the start of the bargaining process by which they will ultimately get what they want: the West's endorsement of their right to a nuclear program and removal of sanctions. The question here is whether the negotiators, led by European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and backed up by political leaders such as President Obama and French President Hollande, have the will to stick to this position rather than being enticed into a bazaar-style barter in which the Iranians are bound to win. If, as is reported, the West's stance is just a preliminary bid, then we will soon know the answer." http://t.uani.com/LiKt40

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

No comments:

Post a Comment