|
|||||||
Please take a moment to visit and log in at the subscriber area, and
submit your city & country location. We will use this information in
future to invite you to any events that we organize in your area.
Dear Reader:
I appeared yesterday on Sun Network's The
Arena with Michael Coren to discuss the implications of the Egyptian
presidential election. It can be seen here.
Yours sincerely,
Daniel Pipes
After an Israeli Strike on Iran
[N.B.: This version
differs slight from the Washington Times text]
How will Iranians respond to an Israeli
strike against their nuclear infrastructure? The answers to this prediction
matters greatly, affecting not just Jerusalem's decision but also how much
other states work to impede an Israeli strike.
Analysts generally offer up best-case
predictions for policies of deterrence and containment (some commentators
even go so far as to welcome
an Iranian nuclear capability) while forecasting worst-case results from
a strike. They foresee Tehran doing everything possible to retaliate, such as
kidnapping, terrorism, missile attacks, naval combat, and closing the Strait
of Hormuz. These predictions ignore two facts: neither of Israel's prior
strikes against enemy states building nuclear weapons, Iraq in 1981 and Syria
in 2007, prompted retaliation; and a review the Islamic Republic of Iran's
history since 1979 points to "a more measured and less apocalyptic—if
still sobering—assessment of the likely aftermath of a preventive
strike."
Those are the words of Michael Eisenstadt and
Michael Knights of the Washington Institute for Near Eastern Policy, who
provide an excellent guide to possible scenarios in "Beyond
Worst-Case Analysis: Iran's Likely Responses to an Israeli Preventive Strike."
Their survey of Iranian behavior over the past three decades leads them to
anticipate that three main principles would likely shape and limit Tehran's
response to an Israeli strike: an insistence on reciprocity, a caution not to
gratuitously make enemies, and a wish to deter further Israeli (or American)
strikes.
The mullahs, in other words, face serious
limits on their ability to retaliate, including military weakness and a
pressing need not to make yet more external enemies. With these guidelines in
place, Eisenstadt and Knights consider eight possible Iranian actions, each
of which must be assessed while keeping in mind the alternative – namely, apocalyptic
Islamists controlling nuclear weapons:
The authors also consider three potential
side effects of an Israeli strike. Yes, Iranians might rally to their
government in the immediate aftermath of a strike, but in the longer term
Tehran "could be criticized for handling the nuclear dossier in a way that
led to military confrontation." The so-called Arab street is perpetually
predicted to rise up in response to outside military attack, but it never
does; likely unrest among the Shi'a of the Persian Gulf would be
counterbalanced by the many Arabs quietly cheering the Israelis. As for
leaving the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and starting an overt crash
nuclear weapons program, while "a very real possibility," the more
the Iranians retaliate, the harder they will find it to obtain the parts for
such a program.
In all, these dangers are unpleasant but not
cataclysmic, manageable not devastating. Eisenstadt and Knights expect a
short phase of high-intensity Iranian response, to be followed by a
"protracted low intensity conflict that could last for months or even years"
– much as already exists between Iran and Israel. An Israeli preventive
strike, they conclude, while a "high-risk endeavor carrying a potential
for escalation in the Levant or the Gulf, … would not be the apocalyptic
event some foresee."
This analysis makes a convincing case that
the danger of nuclear weapons falling into Iranian hands far exceeds the
danger of a military strike to prevent that from happening.
Mr. Pipes (www.DanielPipes.org) is president of
the Middle East Forum and Taube distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover
Institution of Stanford University. © 2012 by Daniel Pipes. All rights
reserved.
|
|||||||
To subscribe to this list, go to http://www.danielpipes.org/list_subscribe.php (Daniel Pipes sends out a mailing of his writings 1-2 times a week.)
Sign up for related (but non-duplicating)
e-mail services:
Middle East Forum (media alerts, event reports, MEQ articles) Campus Watch (research, news items, press releases) at http://www.danielpipes.org/list_subscribe.php |
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
#1164 Pipes in Wash. Times: "After an Israeli Strike on Iran"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment