In this mailing:
Arab
Spring: A Blessing for Hamas
Be the first of your
friends to like this.
Egypt's
Mursi has put Hamas's Mashaal on an equal footing with heads of state, thus
granting legitimacy not only to the Hamas leader but to its entire movement.
Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, has also been officially invited to the
Presidential Palace in Cairo.
Hamas has good reason to be extremely happy
with the "Arab Spring" that has been sweeping the Arab world for
nearly two years: thanks to the "Arab Spring," Hamas leader Khaled
Mashaal has, for the first time ever, entered the Presidential Palace in Cairo.
Until recently, Mashaal and other Hamas leaders
were considered personae non gratae [unwelcome people] in both Jordan
and Egypt.
Mashaal was ousted from Syria earlier this year
because he refused to support Bashar Assad in his confrontation with the opposition,
which is mostly dominated by Islamists. But Mashaal knows that it is only a
matter of time before the "Arab Spring" sees Islamists take control
over Syria, enabling him to become a welcome guest in the presidential palace
in Damascus.
Last week, however, Mashaal was invited to a
meeting with newly elected Muslim Brotherhood candidate Mohamed Mursi in the
Palace of Ittihadiyah in the Egyptian capital.
Mashaal was the first Hamas representative ever
to enter the palace. Prior to the downfall of Hosni Mubarak's regime, Mashaal
and other Hamas leaders could only dream of the day when they would be received
by an Egyptian president in his palace.
But the "Arab Spring," which had been
hijacked by Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist groups in Tunisia and Egypt,
has so far proven to be a blessing for Hamas, an offshoot of the Muslim
Brotherhood, and now seeking to reap the fruits of the rise of Islamists to
power in the Arab world.
Mashaal was invited to the Al-Ittihadiyah
Palace one day after his rival, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas,
met with the new Egyptian president.
By meeting separately with Mashaal and Abbas,
Mursi has created the impression that the Palestinians have two legitimate
leaders. Even more, Mursi has put Mashaal on an equal footing with heads of
state, thus granting legitimacy not only to the Hamas leader, but to his entire
movement.
Also last week, the new Egyptian president
surprised many Palestinians when he personally phoned a top Hamas official who
had just been released from Israeli prison to offer his greetings.
Even the Hamas official, Abdel Aziz Dweik,
expressed surprise at the phone call from the president of the largest Arab
country.
According to Hamas sources, Mursi is also
expected to meet soon with Hamas Prime Minister, Ismail Haniyeh, who has also
been officially invited to the presidential palace in Cairo.
In a move that is expected to further embolden
Hamas and tighten its grip on the Gaza Strip, Mursi is said to have promised
the Islamist movement to ease travel restrictions imposed on residents of the
Gaza Strip
Another Arab leader who seems to be aware of
the growing power of the Islamists in the Arab world is Jordan's King Abdullah.
Jordan's Muslim Brotherhood organization has
already created enough trouble for the monarch. Exploiting demands for reform
and democracy inspired by the "Arab Spring," some Muslim Brotherhood
leaders and members are now working to undermine King Abdullah with the
ultimate goal of turning the kingdom into an Islamist emirate.
The king is so worried that he recently invited
Khaled Mashaal to his palace in Amman and asked him to use his good offices
with Muslim Brotherhood to calm things down. King Abdullah is particularly
concerned about calls by Muslim Brotherhood and other opposition groups to
boycott parliamentary elections later this year.
The fact that the Jordanian king has to seek
Hamas's help in restraining Muslim Brotherhood is a sign of the Islamist
movement's increased influence in wake of the "Arab Spring."
While the "Arab Spring" has
strengthened Hamas, it has at the same time dealt a severe blow to less radical
Palestinians such as Mahmoud Abbas and Salam Fayyad.
Unless Abbas and Fayyad become members of
Muslim Brotherhood or Hamas, the heroes of "Arab Spring" will continue
to look at them as traitors and puppets in the hands of Israel and the US. The
rising power of Hamas makes any talk about a peace process sound like a joke.
Where
is the Evidence?
Be the first of your
friends to like this.
What proof
is there that the accession to power of the peaceful faction of the Muslim
Brotherhood will not be followed by a takeover by the by the non-peaceful
faction, which will refuse to step down, as Hamas has done in Gaza, on the
pretext that only they are qualified to apply God's law?
There are two distinct factions within the
Muslim Brotherhood: one which believes that a peaceful accession to state power
is possible, and another that power can only be seized by force of arms.
The history of the Muslim Brotherhood is well
documented by the eminent Egyptian historian, Abdul Rahman el-Rafi'i, who
distinguishes between two factions within its membership structure. One, which
included its founder, Hassan el-Banna himself, believed that the Society's
ultimate aim of attaining political power could be achieved by peaceful means
-- by winning over the majority of the people to its rallying call. This faction
can only be regarded as a legitimate component of the mosaic of Egyptian
political life. Even those who oppose the vision and ideology of the Muslim
Brothers have no right to consider members who aspire to power through
persuasion as anything other than legitimate players in the democratic game.
The same does not apply, however, to the other
faction within the Muslim Brotherhood, led by Sayed Qutb which, according to
el-Rafi'i, considered that working to attain power by mobilizing public opinion
through elections would take too long, and that the use of force was the only
viable option. The proponents of this school of thought are not politicians
but, in the words of el Rafi'i, "terrorists."
As al-Rafi'i wrote in his book, In the
Aftermath of the Egyptian Revolution of 1919 , under the heading "A
Paroxysm of Bloodshed and Terrorism": "Contributing to the dramatic
rise in the murder and crime rate was the adoption by terrorist elements in the
society of the Moslem Brothers of militant violent political action as a means
of overthrowing the political order. There is no doubt that the aim of these
elements was the seizure of power by the Society. It is equally clear from the
statements made by Hassan el-Banna, the Supreme Guide of the Society of the
Moslem Brothers, that he believed he would one day reach power."
To be fair to el-Banna, however, here are words
by the same author: "It appears from the statements he made that he wanted
to overthrow the regime … not through bloodshed and terrorism but by winning
over the majority of the Egyptian people. But the terrorists among his
followers disdained the constitutional route to power, opting for the more
direct route of murder and terror. Hence the campaigns launched at one time by some
Moslem Brothers against constitutional systems."
Among the Brothers who sought to reach power in
Egypt not through elections – as el-Banna advocated – but through the use of
force were those who murdered Egyptian prime minister Mahmoud Fahmy el-Noqrashy
(1948), judge Ahmed el-Khazindar (1948) and General Selim Zaky (1948); fired
shots at Gamal Abdel Nasser in Alexandria's Mansheya Square (1954), killed
Minister of Waqf Dr. el-Dahaby (1977), assassinated President Anwar Sadat
(1981), killed Egyptian intellectual Farag Foda (1992) and attempted to kill
Egyptian Nobel laureate Naguib Mahfouz (1993). These murderers belonged,
obviously, to the faction within the Society of Muslim Brothers whose members
disagreed with el-Banna's preference for a "peaceful" accession to
power through winning over the hearts and minds of the Egyptian people; and who
believed, rather, that power would only be attained by force of arms.
Since the Brothers' assassination of Prime
Minister el-Nuqrashi in 1948 until their failed assassination attempt against
Egypt's president in Addis Ababa in 1995, there is no evidence that the first
faction which subscribes to el-Banna's doctrine of accession to power by
non-violent means has become the only faction within the Society. Some might argue
that this view confuses the Muslim Brothers with other movements, such as the
Jama'at Islamiya, Jihad or the Jama'at Takfireya. But, as is known to all other
students of political Islam in Egypt, the "kitchen" of the Muslim
Brothers is the source of all other trends of political Islam.
Their literature (whether peaceful, like the
works of el-Banna, or militant like those of Sayed Qutb) are the reference
works for all the Egyptian trends of political Islam – indeed, for all trends
of political Islam in the world.
Take, for example, the literature of the
Wahhabi ideology, which is simplistic and shallow -- its driving force the
momentum of petrodollars. It does not rise to the level of the literature of
such masters as Hassan el-Banna or Sayed Qutb, a far deeper thinker than the
man who inspired him, Abul'Ala el-Mawdoody.
Although all the illegal measures taken by the
Egyptian authorities against the Muslim Brothers from 1948 up to the present
day are truly deplorable, at the same time, what proof do we have that the
faction of Hassan el-Banna, who advocated accession to power by peaceful means,
is today the only faction within the Society of the Muslim Brothers?
And what proof is there that the faction which
opted for forceful reform, through the use of violence and bloodshed, has
disappeared?
Or, for that matter, what proof is there that
the accession to power of the peaceful faction of the Muslim Brotherhood will
not be followed by a takeover by the non-peaceful faction, which will refuse to
step down, as Hamas has done in Gaza, on the pretext that only they are
qualified to apply God's law?
Mr.
Blowback Rising
by Pepe Escobar • Jul 24, 2012 at 7:45 am
Be the first of your
friends to like this.
Typhoon Vicente
struck Hong Kong big time on Monday night. I decided to heed the Bat-signal.
When I came out of the multiplex all windy, rainy hell was breaking loose.
Deserted streets. No taxis. So I walked back home, soaking wet, musing on The
Dark Knight Rises. Fascinating how the plot may be read as a
criminalization of Occupy Wall Street – reduced to a bunch of weaponized
anarchists. Fascinating how a nuclear bomb explodes outside Manhattan and
there's no radiation.
Most of all I was intrigued by Bane – the
Hannibal Lecter cum Darth Vader bad guy. He was designed as a cartoonish
personification of ultimate evil – complete with unintelligible dialogue
delivered under a mask/voice box/painkiller set up. He may have been the only
living creature who escaped a pit from hell – like a Poe nightmare set in the
desert. Later in life he becomes the ultimate populist terrorist.
And then the typhoon enlightened me. He's not
just Bane; he's Blowback. The pit where he escaped from is set in what could be
the outskirts of an Iraqi or Syrian village in the hinterland. He runs his own
militia. He's in bed with bankers. His allure is so powerful that he attracts
PhD copycats such as the Colorado Batman shooter. And he inflicts a terrible
ordeal on New York – sorry, Gotham – worse than 9/11.
There is a Bane, or a wealth of Banes, lurking
over there, around that line in the sand that divided the Middle East almost a
century ago between two colonial powers. Once again, in Syria, "we"
are in bed with Salafi-jihadists. Yet in pure Jim Morrison style in L.A.Woman,
we should be singing Mr. Blowback riiisin'…
As Hong Kong survived Typhoon Vicente with
barely a scratch, I sat down, deep into the night, and wrote
this story.
No comments:
Post a Comment