 |
|||||
|
Join
Daniel Pipes in Cyprus in October 2013. For more information, click here.
|
|||||
|
Please take a moment to visit
and log in at the subscriber
area, and submit your city & country location. We will use this
information in future to invite you to any events that we organize in your
area.
Dear Reader:
The Middle East Forum
sponsored a conference in New York City on Mar. 7 organized by Steven J.
Rosen on the topic of "Changing U.S. Policy on UNRWA and the 'Palestine
Refugees'." For coverage of the event, see:
For
Palestinian reactions to our initiative, see:
Yours sincerely,
Daniel Pipes
No Disagreement
between Hamas and Fatah
  Be the first of your friends to like this.
MA: Yes, we have. Moreover, that's something we have agreed on. A number of Hamas members support this stance. That's what we agreed on during our meeting in Cairo, and several months ago at the summit of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation we reaffirmed that the Palestinian people have the right to non-violent resistance. We are going back to the negotiating process. There is no disagreement on this between us and Hamas leaders, though some keep saying that they don't consider a peaceful solution the only option and don't rule out military struggle. But all this talk stopped at the Cairo meeting, which was sponsored by the US and Egypt. Now this is Hamas's official stance. Pay no attention to the odd Hamas members that say different. … RT: The EU is said to be considering a move to take Hamas off the list of terrorist organizations. Do you think that this may be an attempt to legitimize the Hamas-led government? MA: I don't think so. After the recent developments, the chances are quite high that the Hamas government may be recognized as legitimate. If Hamas is committed to the ceasefire and if it openly pledges to stick to the peaceful popular resistance, I don't see much difference between their policy and ours. In this case, there is no need to label them as a terrorist organization. RT: But you didn't target Israel with rockets…. MA: Neither we nor Hamas did. Not any longer. After the Second Intifada, we decided to give up on armed resistance. And let me be totally frank with you: we don't want to launch any armed resistance whatsoever. Hamas has said the same. Yes, there were clashes in the past, but they have stopped – and I'm grateful to Allah for that. Of course, in each of the three bolded statements, Abbas stressed that Hamas has adopted Fatah's non-violent approach, and not the reverse. But for anyone with eyes to see, this is clearly false. Even the interviewer points out that Hamas keeps attacking Israel with rockets, a fact that Abbas baldly denies. I understand the real message here to be not that Hamas has joined Fatah on the path of deciding "to give up on armed resistance" but quite the reverse; that both of them are playing the game of pretending to end violence, which Abbas has no more abandoned than Hamas has. (March 15, 2013)
Related
Topics: Arab-Israel
conflict & diplomacy, Palestinians This
text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral
whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date,
place of publication, and original URL.
|
|||||
|
To subscribe to this list, go to http://www.danielpipes.org/list_subscribe.php
Sign up for related (but non-duplicating)
e-mail services:
Middle East Forum (articles and event reports) Campus Watch (articles, blog posts) Islamist Watch (articles, blog posts) Legal Project (articles, blog posts) at http://www.danielpipes.org/list_subscribe.php |
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment